Ecology in Europe: Is there an ‘empty’ niche for the new journal among competitors, predators and parasites?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/eje-2015-0001Keywords:
Life Sciences > Human Biology, Life Sciences > Plant Science, Life Sciences > Zoology, Life Sciences > EcologyAbstract
References
Aarssen, L. W., Tregenza, T., Budden, A. E., Lortie, C. J., Koricheva, J., & Leimu, R. (2008) Bang for your buck: rejection rates and impact factors in ecological journals. The Open Ecology Journal, 1, 14-19. Beall, J. (2012) Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489, 179.
Google Scholar
Bohannon, J. (2013) Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60-65.
Google Scholar
Broad, W.J. (1981) The publishing game: getting more for less. Science, 211(4487), 1137-1139.
Google Scholar
Fox M. & Hanlon S.M. (2015) Barriers to Open Access uptake for researchers in Africa. Online Information Review, 39, 698-716. doi: 10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0147.
Google Scholar
Grossman, G.D. (2014) Improving the reviewing process in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 37(1), 101-105.
Google Scholar
Hochberg, M.E. (2000) Youth and the tragedy of the reviewer commons. Ideas in ecology and evolution, 3, 8-10.
Google Scholar
Kangas, A. & Hujala T. (2015) Challenges in publishing: producing, assuring and communicating quality. Silva Fennica, 49, 1304.
Google Scholar
Morelli, F. & Tryjanowski, P. (2015) No species is an island: testing the effects of biotic interactions on models of avian niche occupation. Ecology and evolution, 5, 759-768.
Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. & Kitching, R. L. (1988) Food web patterns: trivial flaws or the basis of an active research program? Ecology, 69, 1669- 1672.
Google Scholar
Nwagwu, W.E. (2013) “Open access initiatives in Africa – structure, incentives and disincentives”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.024.
Google Scholar
Sagarin, R. & Pauchard, A. (2009) Observational approaches in ecology open new ground in a changing world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 379-386.
Google Scholar
Statzner, B. & Resh, V. H. (2010) Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences. Freshwater Biology, 55, 2639-2653.
Google Scholar
United Nations (1966) “International covenant on civil and political rights: article 19”. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/en/ professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Google Scholar
Villard, M. & Nudds T.D. (2008) Establishing a new scientific journal: trials and tribulations. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 3(2), 7.
Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Bohannon, J. (2013) Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60-65.
Google Scholar
Broad, W.J. (1981) The publishing game: getting more for less. Science, 211(4487), 1137-1139.
Google Scholar
Fox M. & Hanlon S.M. (2015) Barriers to Open Access uptake for researchers in Africa. Online Information Review, 39, 698-716. doi: 10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0147.
Google Scholar
Grossman, G.D. (2014) Improving the reviewing process in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 37(1), 101-105.
Google Scholar
Hochberg, M.E. (2000) Youth and the tragedy of the reviewer commons. Ideas in ecology and evolution, 3, 8-10.
Google Scholar
Kangas, A. & Hujala T. (2015) Challenges in publishing: producing, assuring and communicating quality. Silva Fennica, 49, 1304.
Google Scholar
Morelli, F. & Tryjanowski, P. (2015) No species is an island: testing the effects of biotic interactions on models of avian niche occupation. Ecology and evolution, 5, 759-768.
Google Scholar
Pimm, S. L. & Kitching, R. L. (1988) Food web patterns: trivial flaws or the basis of an active research program? Ecology, 69, 1669- 1672.
Google Scholar
Nwagwu, W.E. (2013) “Open access initiatives in Africa – structure, incentives and disincentives”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.024.
Google Scholar
Sagarin, R. & Pauchard, A. (2009) Observational approaches in ecology open new ground in a changing world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 379-386.
Google Scholar
Statzner, B. & Resh, V. H. (2010) Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences. Freshwater Biology, 55, 2639-2653.
Google Scholar
United Nations (1966) “International covenant on civil and political rights: article 19”. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/en/ professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Google Scholar
Villard, M. & Nudds T.D. (2008) Establishing a new scientific journal: trials and tribulations. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 3(2), 7.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
2015-06-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Piotr Tryjanowski, Martin Hromada, Federico Morelli, Emma Nelson, Pavol Prokop, Luis Reino, Lajos Rozsa, Reuven Yosef

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright in their articles.
Articles in the European Journal of Ecology published 2020 and after are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Articles in the European Journal of Ecology published 2015-2019 are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 license.
How to Cite
Tryjanowski, P., Hromada, M., Morelli, F., Nelson, E., Prokop, P., Reino, L., Rozsa, L., & Yosef, R. (2015). Ecology in Europe: Is there an ‘empty’ niche for the new journal among competitors, predators and parasites?. European Journal of Ecology, 1(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1515/eje-2015-0001