Heat Flow in the Cretaceous of Northwestern Kansas and Implications for Regional Hydrology

Authors

  • Andrea Forster GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg
  • Daniel F. Merriam Kansas Geological Survey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/cres.v0i240.11787

Abstract

Temperature logs are interpreted to investigate the thermal structure of the units overlying the Kansas portion of the Cretaceous Dakota aquifer. The aim of this study is to determine if additional heat input by fluids exists and thus clarify whether the overall conductive heat flow from the basement through the sequence might be overprinted by heat advection. Although interval thermal gradients are determined for different lithologic (stratigraphic) units, the shale thermal gradients are preferred for heat-flow estimation. Shale thermal conductivity as measured in Mesozoic shales in Nebraska and South Dakota is extrapolated to the area because of the similar lithology. A few thermal-conductivity values are determined in sandstone samples of the Dakota Formation and also used in heat-flow estimation. In general, the noncalcareous, marine Cretaceous shales (Pierre, Carlile, Graneros, and Kiowa) show different thermal gradients. Gradients in the Pierre (average value 58.5°C/km) and Carlile (55.5°C/km) are slightly higher than the average gradient in the Graneros Shale (45.1°C/km) and Kiowa Formation (46.5°C/km). The higher thermal gradients are limited to the extreme northwestern corner of the study area where the Pierre and Carlile are present. The heat-flow density of 69-74 mW/m2 observed there is slightly higher than the average of 60 mW/m2 typical for central and eastern Kansas. The higher heat flow observed is in the range of data reported and mapped for northeastern Colorado and the Nebraska Panhandle on the western flank of the Chadron Arch, an area with geothermal overprint by warm fluids. Regional differences in heat flow in western Kansas seemingly are caused by the different composition, porosity, and permeability of the aquifer and the nearness to recharge areas.

References

Belitz, K., and Bredehoeft, J. D., 1988, Hydrodynamics of Denver Basin—Explanation of subnormal fluid pressures: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin 72, no. 11, p. 1,334–1,359.

Birch, F., 1947, Crustal structure and surface-heat flow near the Colorado Front Range: American Geophysical Union Transactions, v. 28, no. 5, p. 792–797.

Blackwell, D. D., and Steele, J. L., 1988, Thermal conductivity of sedimentary rock—Measurement and significance; in, Thermal History of Sedimentary Basins—Methods and Case Histories, N. D. Naeser and T. H. McCulloh, eds.: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p. 13–36.

______, 1989, Heat flow and geothermal potential of Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 226, p. 267–291.

______, 1992, Geothermal map of North America: Geological Society of America, map, scale 1:5,000,000.

Blackwell, D. D., Steele, J. L., and Steeples, D. W., 1981, Heatflow determinations in Kansas and their implications for midcontinent heat flow (abstract): EOS, v. 62, no. 17 p. 392.

Förster, A., Schrötter, J., Merriam, D. F., and Blackwell, D. D., 1996, Application of optical-fibre temperature logging, an example in a sedimentary environment: Geophysics (in press).

Gosnold, W. D., Jr., 1990, Heat flow in the Great Plains of the United States: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 95, no. 1, p. 353–374.

Gosnold, W. D., Jr., and Eversoll, D. A., 1981, Usefulness of heat flow data in regional assessment of low-temperature geothermal resources with special reference to Nebraska: Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, v. 5, p. 79–82.

______, 1982, Geothermal resources of Nebraska: National Geophysical and Solar-Terrestrial Data Center (Boulder, Colorado), map, scale 1:500,000.

Gosnold, W. D., Jr., and Fischer, D. W., 1986, Heat flow studies in sedimentary basins; in, Thermal Modeling in Sedimentary Basins, J. Burrus, ed.: Paris, Editions Technip, p. 199–217.

Gosnold, W. D., Jr., Becker, D. J., and Eversoll, D. A., 1981, New heat flow data from Nebraska (abstract): EOS, v. 62, no. 45, p. 1,054.

Helgesen, J. O., Leonard, R. B., and Wolf, R. J., 1984, Regional study of the Dakota aquifer (Darton’s Dakota revisited); in Geohydrology of the Dakota aquifer, D.G. Jorgensen, ed.: National Water Well Association (Worthington, Ohio), p. 69–73.

Hurtig, E., Großwig, S., Jobmann, M., Kühn, K., and Marschall, P., 1994, Fibre optic temperature measurements in boreholes—Application for fluid logging: Geothermics, v. 23, no.

, p. 355–364.

Jorgensen, D. G., Helgesen, J. O., and Imes, J. L., 1993, Regional aquifers in Kansas, Nebraska and part of Arkansas, Colorado, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming—Geohydrologic framework: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1414-B, 72 p.

Macfarlane, P. A., 1995, The effect of river valleys and the Upper Cretaceous aquitard on regional flow in the Dakota aquifer in the central Great Plains of Kansas and southeastern Colorado: Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 238, p. 11–30.

Macfarlane, P. A., Whittemore, D. O., Chu, T. Butler, J. J., Jr., Wade, A., Coleman, J., Doveton, J. H., Mitchell, J., and Kay, S., 1992, The Dakota Aquifer Program—Annual report, FY91: Kansas Geological Survey, Open-file Report 92-1, 93 p.

McGovern, H. E., and Wolf, R. J., 1993, Geohydrology systems in Kansas—Geohydrology of the Great Plains aquifer system: U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Investigations, Atlas HA- 722-G, 2 sheets.

Merriam, D. F., 1957, Subsurface correlation and stratigraphic relation of rocks of Mesozoic age in Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Oil and Gas Investigations, v. 14, 25 p.

______, 1958, Structure of the central part of the Great Plains: Kansas Geological Society 22nd Field Conference Guidebook, p. 89–99.

______, 1963, The geologic history of Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 162, 317 p.

Moore, R. C., Frye, J. C., Jewett, J. M., Lee, Wallace, and O’Connor, H. G., 1952, Graphic column of Kansas rocks: Kansas Geological Survey, chart, 1 sheet.

Pruit, J. D., 1978, Statistical and geological evaluation of oil and gas production from the J sandstone, Denver Basin, Colorado, Nebraska and Wyoming; in, Energy resources of the Denver Basin, J. D. Pruit, and P. E. Coffin, eds.: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, 1978 Symposium (Denver, Colorado), p. 9–24.

Sass, J. H., and Galanis, S. P., Jr., 1983, Temperatures, thermal conductivity, and heat flow from a well in Pierre Shale near Hayes, South Dakota: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-file Report 83-25, 10 p.

Sass, J. H., Lachenbruch, A. H., and Munroe, R. S., 1971, Thermal conductivity of rocks from measurements on fragments and its application to heat-flow determinations: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 76, no. 14, p. 3,391– 3,401.

Stavnes, S. A., 1982, A preliminary study of the temperature distribution in Kansas and its relationship to the geology: M.S. thesis, University of Kansas, 311 p.

Steeples, D. W., and Stavnes, S. A., 1982, Assessment of the geothermal resources of Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Open-file Report 82-22, 565 p.

Tourtelot, H. E., 1962, Preliminary investigation of the geologic setting and chemical composition of the Pierre Shale, Great Plains region: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 390, 74 p.

Whittemore, D. O., Macfarlane, P. A., Doveton, J. H., Butler, J.

J., Jr., Chu, T., Bassler, R., Smith, M., Mitchell, J., and Wade, A., 1993, The Dakota aquifer program—Annual report, FY92: Kansas Geological Survey, Open-file Report 93-1, 170 p.

Zeller, D. E., ed, 1968, The stratigraphic succession in Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 189, 81 p.

Downloads

Published

1997-01-31