Using the Cosmic Curriculum of Dr. Montessori Toward the Development of a Place-Based Indigenous Science Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v7i2.15763Keywords:
Montessori, Cosmic Curriculum, Hawaiian Language Immersion, Indigenous epistemology, culture-based science curricula, Anschauung educatorsAbstract
Indigenous educators desire to use culturally restorative and decolonized pedagogies reflective of their own cultural values and beliefs in their science programs but have lacked models for how to start. They also often lack confidence in their ability to teach the sciences. This three-year qualitative case study used grounded theory methodology to discover (a) how Hawaiian language immersion (HLC) K–6 educators used Maria Montessori’s Cosmic Curriculum for the creation of a science program based on Hawaiian epistemology and cultural values and (b) why the Cosmic Curriculum appealed to the HLC educators. Five key themes emerged: (a) the notion of creation as interconnected and relational, (b) an epistemological similarity regarding how people learn, (c) using timelines as organizing cognitive structures, (d) a focus on the natural sciences, and (e) the use of storytelling and key lessons to engage students. Participants stated that they felt successful in creating science curriculum and teaching the sciences as they adapted the above aspects of Dr. Montessori’s Cosmic Curriculum. Future research should be conducted to discover if her Cosmic Curriculum can be adapted for use in other types of non-Montessori program and whether this kind of science program could encourage students to choose the sciences as a career choice.
References
Aikenhead, G. (2001, September). Integrating Western and Aboriginal science: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013151709605
Aslan, D., Tąs, I., & Oğul, I. G. (2016). Pre- and in-service preschool teachers’ science teaching efficacy beliefs. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(14). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1108207.pdf
Baker, I. (2011). The long black strip: A lesson in humility. Montessori Services. https://www.montessoriservi-ces.com/ideas-insights/the-long-black-strip
Bang, M., Marin, A., & Medin, D. (2018, Spring). If indigenous peoples stand with the sciences, will scientists stand with us? Daedalus, 147(2), 148–159. http://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00498
Beckwith, M. W. (1951). The Kumulipo: A Hawaiian creation chant. http://www.sacred-texts.com/pac/ku/
Bernard, R. E., & Cooperdock, E. H. G. (2018, April 30). No progress on diversity in 40 years. Nature Geoscience, 11, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6
Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97(6), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21078
Boris, V. (2017, December 20). What makes storytelling so effective for learning? Harvard Business Publishing. https://www.harvardbusiness.org/what-makes-storytelling-so-effective-for-learning/
Cajete, G. A. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clearlight Publishers.
Cartier, K. M. S. (2019, December). Keeping Indigenous science knowledge out of a colonial mold. Eos, 100. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EO137505.
Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2019). Montessori schools around the world. https://www.public-montessori.org/montessori/
Chattin-McNichols, J. (1991). The Montessori controversy. Delmar.
Chun, M. N. (2006). A`o: Educational traditions. University of Hawai`i Curriculum Research & Development Group.
Cossentino, J. (2005, February). Ritualizing experience: A non-Montessorian view of the Montessori Method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211–244. http://doi.org/10.1086/426838
Datta, R. (2017). Traditional storytelling: An effective Indigenous research methodology and its implications for environmental research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 14(1), 35–44. http://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117741351
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
Downs, R. B. (1975). Heinrich Pestalozzi, father of modern pedagogy. Twayne Publishers.
Duffy, M., & Duffy, D. (2002). Children of the universe: Cosmic education in the Montessori elementary class-room. Parent Child Press.
Elers, S. (2016, June). Refuting Denzin’s claims: grounded theory and indigenous research. Grounded Theory Review, 2(16). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2016/12/19/refuting-denzins-claims-grounded-theory-and-indigenous-research/
Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. C. (2014). Funds of identity: A new concept based on the Funds of Knowledge approach. Culture and Psychology, 20(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515934
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Routledge.
Frierson, P. R. (2014). Maria Montessori’s epistemology. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22(4), 767–791. http://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2014.960794
Green, V. (2021). How to include Indigenous researchers and their knowledge. Nature, 589, 315–317. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00022-1
Greenburg, A. (2020, September 11). An indigenous bioethicist on CRISPR and decolonizing DNA. PBS Online. NOVA Newsletter. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/bioethics-crispr-indigenous-genome/
Gulino, P., & Shears, C. (2018). The science of screenwriting: The neuroscience behind storytelling strategies. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hawai`i State Department of Education. (2021). Hawaiian language immersion program. https://www.hawaiipublicschools.org/TeachingAndLearning/StudentLearning/HawaiianEducation/Pages/trans-lation.aspx
Holmes, C. C. (2018). Introduction of Montessori education to a remote Indigenous early childhood program: A study of the ways in which Aboriginal students respond. Journal of Montessori Research, 4(2), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v4i2.6715
James, K. (2001). Fires need fuel: Merging science education with American Indian needs. In K. James (Ed.), Science and Native American communities: Legacies of pain, visions of promise (pp. 1–8). University of Nebraska Press.
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266
Kahn, B., Robbins, C., & Okrent, A. (2020). Science and engineering indicators 2020: The state of U.S. science and engineering (NSB-2020-1). National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/
Kahn, D. (1998). The Kodaikanal experience: Kahn– Montessori interview. The NAMTA Journal, 23(2), 34–42.
Kelling, I. K., & Schonleber, N. S. (2011). He `ike pāpālua o ke ao me ka pō: Teaching science in a Hawaiian cultural context. Hūlili: Multidisciplinary Research on Hawaiian Well-Being, 7, 223–258.
Kramer, R. (1988). Maria Montessori: A biography. Perseus Books.
Lee, S. F. (2020). Maria Montessori: A complex and multifaceted historiographical subject. American Psycho-logical Association, 20(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000150
Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2004). Constant comparison. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vols. 1-0). Sage.
Lipka, J., & Ilutsik, E. (1995). Negotiated change: Yup’ik perspectives on indigenous schooling. The Bilingual Research Journal, 19(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1995.10668600
Meyer, M. A. (2001). Our own liberation: Reflections on Hawaiian epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific, 13(1), 124–148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23718511
Meyer, M. A. (2003). Ho`oulu: Our time of beginning. `Ai Pōhaku Press.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352.
Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori Method. Schocken Books. (Original work published 1912)
Montessori, M. (1965). Dr. Montessori’s own handbook: A short guide to her ideas and materials. Schocken Books. (Original work published 1914)
Montessori, M. (1967). The discovery of the child. Clio Press. (Original work published 1948)
Montessori, M. (1991). To educate the human potential. Kalakshetra Press. (Original work published 1948)
Montessori, M. (1994). From childhood to adolescence. Clio Press. (Original work published 1948)
Montessori, M. (1992). Peace and education. Clio Press. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (1994). The absorbent mind. Henry Holt and Company. (Original work published 1949)
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16633182
Morris, A. (2020, November 24). “Lifting up native science.” Northwestern University McCormick School of Engineering. Engineering News. https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/news/articles/2020/11/lifting-up-native-science-josiah-hester.html
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
National Research Council. (2014). Furthering America’s research enterprise. The National Academies Press.
Nelson, D. J., & Madesen, L. D. (2018). Diversity in materials science and engineering: Representation of Native Americans in US science and engineering. MRS Bulletin, 43(5), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2018.108
Osorio, J. K. (2002). Dismembering Lāhui: A history of the Hawaiian nation to 1887. University of Hawai`i Press.
Pukui, M. K., & Elbert, S. H. (1986). Hawaiian dictionary: Hawaiian-English, English-Hawaiian, revised and enlarged edition. University of Hawai`i Press.
Reyhner, J. (2017). Affirming identity: The role of language and culture in American Indian education. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1340081
Rice, M. (2020). Honoring indigenous children’s ways of knowing. In J. Reyhner, J. Martin, L. Lockard, & W. S. Gilbert. (Eds.). Honoring our students (pp. 1–23). Northern Arizona University.
Romero-Little, M. E. (2010). How should young Indigenous children be prepared for learning? A vision of early childhood education for Indigenous children. Journal of American Indian Education, 49(1/2), 7–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43608587
Rosenthal, G. (2003). The healing effects of storytelling: On the conditions of curative storytelling in the context of research and counseling. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(6), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403254888
Schonleber, N. S. (2011). Hawaiian culture-based education and the Montessori approach: Overlapping teaching practices, values, and worldview. Journal of American Indian Education, 50(3), 5–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43608610
Schonleber, N. S., & Kelling, I. K. (2018). Creating a culturally responsive K-3 science curriculum: Teachers as cultural brokers. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 24(1), 67–92. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART002368412
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–18). Sage.Takaya, K. (2003). The method of Anschauung: From Johann H. Pestalozzi to Herbert Spencer. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/ Revue De La Pensée Éducative, 37(1), 77–99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23767177
Trudeau, C. M. (1984). Montessori’s years in India. Hawai`i Printing.
Varghese, J., & Crawford, S. S. (2021). A cultural framework for Indigenous, local, and science knowledge systems in ecology and natural resource management. Ecological Monographs, 91(1). Article e01431. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1431
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weaver, M. C. (Ed.). (1994). Tales as tools: The power of story in the classroom. The National Storytelling Press.
Wilson, D., & Baker, M. (2012). Bridging two worlds: Maori mental health nursing. Qualitative Health Research, 22(8), 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312450213
Wilson, W. H., & Kamanā, K. (2001). Mai Loko Mai O Ka`I`ini: Proceeding from a dream: The `Aha Pūnana Leo connection in Hawaiian language revitalization. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 147–176). Academic Press.
Wilson, W. H., & Kamanā, K. (2006). “For the interest of the Hawaiians themselves”: Reclaiming the benefits of Hawaiian-medium education. Hūlili: Multidisciplinary Research on Hawaiian Well-Being, 3(1), 153–181. http://www.ulukau.org/elib/collect/hulili06/index/assoc/D0.dir/doc152.pdf
Yamauchi, L. A. (2003). Making school relevant for at-risk students: The Wai`anae High School Hawaiian Studies Program. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 8(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327671ESPR0804_1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nanette Schonleber
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
Author Agreement
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK
