Midcontinent Geoscience https://journals.ku.edu/mg <p><em>Midcontinent Geoscience</em>&nbsp;is an open-access, peer-reviewed publication of the Kansas Geological Survey, a research and service division of the University of Kansas. The journal publishes a broad array of original research covering all branches of geology with an emphasis on the midcontinent region of the United States, including the Great Plains and Central Lowland provinces.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> Kansas Geological Survey en-US Midcontinent Geoscience 2689-906X <p>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License</a>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.</p> <p><strong>Midcontinent Geoscience</strong><br> <strong>Author Agreement</strong><br> <br> The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and Midcontinent Geoscience (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration. &nbsp;<br> <br> Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.&nbsp;<br> <br> A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS<br> After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:&nbsp;<br> 1.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.<br> 2.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of the Work, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.<br> 3.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit, and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)<br> 4.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.<br> <br> B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES<br> 1.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.<br> 2.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.<br> <br> C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY<br> The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.&nbsp;<br> <br> D.&nbsp; JOURNAL’S DUTIES&nbsp;<br> In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.&nbsp;<br> <br> E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT&nbsp;<br> This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.&nbsp;<br> ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK</p> Diagenesis of Hunton Group Carbonates (Silurian) West Carney Field, Logan and Lincoln Counties, Oklahoma, U.S.A. https://journals.ku.edu/mg/article/view/13583 <p class="p1">The West Carney Hunton Field (WCHF) is an important oil field in central Oklahoma. Deposited during a series of sea-level rises and falls on a shallow shelf, the Cochrane and Clarita Formations (Hunton Group) have undergone a complex series of diagenetic events. The Hunton section of the WCHF comprises dolomitized crinoidal packstones, brachiopod “reefs” and grainstones, thin intervals of fine-grained crinoidal wackestones, and infrequent mudstones that were diagenetically affected by repeated sea-level change. Widespread karst is evidenced by multiple generations of solution-enlarged fractures, vugs, and breccias, which extend through the entire thickness of the Hunton. Karst development likely occurred during sea-level lowstands. Partial to complete dolomitization of Hunton limestones is interpreted to have occurred as a result of convective circulation of normal seawater during sea-level highstands. Open-space-filling calcite cements postdate dolomitization and predate deposition of the overlying siliciclastic section, which comprises the Misener Sandstone and Woodford Shale. Petrographic evaluation and carbon and oxygen isotope values of the calcite cements suggest precipitation by Silurian seawater and mixed seawater and meteoric water. Carbon and oxygen isotopic signatures of dolomite may have been partially reset by dedolomitization that was concurrent with calcite cementation. Fluid inclusions in late diagenetic celestite crystals observed in the Clarita Formation indicate that the WCHF was invaded by saline basinal fluids and petroleum after burial, during later stages of diagenesis. The timing of late diagenetic fluid flow and petroleum generation likely was during the Ouachita orogeny, which was occurring to the south. There is no evidence that late diagenetic fluids significantly altered the dolomite reservoir that formed earlier. The WCHF provides an ancient example of early diagenetic dolomitization by seawater that remains relatively unaltered by later diagenetic events.</p> Cesar Silva Brian J. Smith Jordan T. Ray James R. Derby Jay M Gregg Copyright (c) 2020 Cesar Silva, Brian J. Smith, Jordan T. Ray, James R. Derby, Jay M Gregg 2020-09-28 2020-09-28 1 30 51 Geological characterization of the Patterson CO2 storage site from 3-D seismic data https://journals.ku.edu/mg/article/view/13795 <p class="p1">Approximately 26 square miles of new 3-D seismic data were acquired in July 2019 over the Patterson Site (Kearny County, Kansas) to assess its potential for carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) storage. Seismic interpretation revealed that the Patterson Site contains multiple structural closures that lie on uplifted fault blocks, bounded by two reverse faults that strike nearly perpendicular to each other. These faults offset Precambrian through Pennsylvanian sections, including several primary reservoir and seal intervals. Fault displacements are maximum at the Precambrian basement and decrease upward. Data indicated a range of structural and combination traps exists at the Patterson Site in the Cambrian-Ordovician Arbuckle through Mississippian Osagian reservoirs. The three-way closures along the NW–SE fault have structural relief of ~130 ft (40 m), and the four-way closures contain relief of ~60 ft (18 m). Erosional surfaces and multiple basement fractures also are observed on the top of the Precambrian. A Mississippian-aged incised valley system also was observed at the Patterson Site. The incised valleys formed during the Meramecian-Chesteran Stages with an incised depth up to 250 ft (76 m). The motion of the reverse faults likely captured existing meandering and linear channels, causing the current deeply incised morphology. The incised valleys observed at Patterson are similar in age, structural style, shape, incision depth, and seismic attribute properties to incised valleys observed by other workers at Pleasant Prairie South, Eubank, and Shuck oil fields (southwest Kansas). Further research should focus on estimating reactivation tendency and sealing characteristics of the reverse faults to evaluate the seal integrity of the saline reservoirs. This will reduce uncertainty concerning the risk of CO<sub>2</sub> migration during injection and storage. Further reservoir description, modeling, and simulation are also underway to characterize the storage potential at the Patterson Site.</p> Jingyao Meng Yevhen Holubnyak Franciszek Hasiuk Jennifer Hollenbach Dana Wreath Copyright (c) 2020 Jenny Meng, Eugene Holubnyak, Franek Hasiuk, Jenn Hollenbach, Dana Wreath 2020-11-24 2020-11-24 1 52 90 Diminishing Depth to Water in Cambrian-Ordovician Arbuckle Group Disposal Wells in Kansas https://journals.ku.edu/mg/article/view/13276 <p class="p1">Industrial and municipal wastewater and oilfield brines have been disposed of into the Cambrian-Ordovician Arbuckle Group for decades in Kansas and nearby states in the midcontinent United States. The industrial and municipal wastewater disposal wells (designated Class I disposal wells) are regulated by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. The oilfield brines are disposed of in Class II disposal wells, which are regulated by the Kansas Corporation Commission. Annual testing of formation pressure and static fluid levels in Class I wells compose a body of data that is useful in monitoring movement of water and fill-up of Arbuckle disposal zones. In western Kansas, the depth to water in wells penetrating the Arbuckle can be several hundred to more than a thousand feet (305 m) below ground surface, but in parts of southern and southeastern Kansas, the depth to water locally can be less than 100 ft (31 m). Furthermore, most Class I wells indicate Arbuckle fluid levels in central and south-central Kansas are rising ~10 ft (~3 m) annually, suggesting that at current disposal rates, the Arbuckle may lose its capacity to accept wastewater under gravity flow in parts of the state in the next few decades, principally south-central and southeastern Kansas along the Oklahoma state line. At present in parts of six Kansas counties along the Oklahoma state line, low-density (~1.0 g/cc or slightly greater density) wastewater in a wellbore does not have a sufficient hydrostatic head by gravity alone to force its way into the more dense resident Arbuckle formation water.</p> <p class="p1">In general, Arbuckle formation water flows west to east in Kansas. Arbuckle disposal wells in Kansas collectively dispose of ~800,000,000 barrels (~127,000,000 m<sup>3</sup>) of wastewater per year, although some of this is recycled from Arbuckle oil production. Declines in oil price since mid-2014 have resulted in less oilfield disposal in the Arbuckle since 2015. The number of Class I wells recording annual fluid rises have also declined since 2015, as has the median of their annual change in static fluid level, but overall, more Class I wells are still recording fluid rises. There is a poor correlation between changes in fluid levels in Class I wells and the volume of fluid disposed in them annually, thereby indicating that more regional characteristics may control water movement in the Arbuckle. More monitoring wells are needed to better understand the movement of water in the deep subsurface and to anticipate any potential problems that may occur with reduced disposal capacity and possible migration of fluids through unplugged or improperly plugged older wells.</p> K. David Newell Shelby Peterie Michael Killion Brandy DeArmond Carrie Ridley Rolfe Mandel Rex Buchanan Copyright (c) 2020 K. David Newell, Shelby Peterie, Michael Killion, Brandy DeArmond, Carrie Ridley, Rolfe Mandel, Rex Buchanan 2020-06-30 2020-06-30 1 1 29