Assessment of user needs of primary biodiversity data: Analysis, concerns, and challenges

Authors

  • Arturo H. Ariño University of Navarra
  • Vishwas Chavan Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat
  • Daniel P. Faith Australian Museum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v8i2.4094

Keywords:

Content Needs Assessment, primary biodiversity data, statistics, survey

Abstract

A Content Needs Assessment (CNA) survey has been conducted in order to determine what GBIF-mediated data users may be using, what they would be using if available, and what they need in terms of primary biodiversity data records. The survey was launched in 2009 in six languages, and collected more than 700 individual responses. Analysis of the responses showed some lack of awareness about the availability of accessible primary data, and pointed out some types of data in high demand for linking to distribution and taxonomical data now derived from the GBIF cache. A notable example was linkages to molecular data. Also, the CNA survey uncovered some biases in the design of user needs surveys, by showing demographic and linguistic effects that may have influenced the distribution of responses received in analogous surveys conducted at the global scale.

Metrics

File downloads
5,101
Jul 2013Jan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202698
|

Downloads

Author Biographies

  • Arturo H. Ariño, University of Navarra
    Professor of Ecology Department of Zoology and Ecology
  • Vishwas Chavan, Global Biodiversity Information Facility Secretariat
    Senior Program Officer for Digitization
  • Daniel P. Faith, Australian Museum
    Principal Research Scientist

Downloads

Published

2013-07-09

Issue

Section

Articles (peer-reviewed)

How to Cite

Ariño, Arturo H., Vishwas Chavan, and Daniel P. Faith. 2013. “Assessment of User Needs of Primary Biodiversity Data: Analysis, Concerns, and Challenges”. Biodiversity Informatics 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v8i2.4094.