Teacher and Student Perceptions of Competency Based Education: A Mixed Methods Exploration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/cberj.v2.23969Keywords:
competency based education, competency based learning, student perecptions, teacher perceptions, grading transitionsAbstract
This study sought to uncover the perceptions of elementary teachers, and students about competency-based education (CBE) in a district transitioning from traditional practices. The purpose was to investigate how CBE is perceived from varying perspectives and identify areas working well and needing improvement during the transition. Utilizing a mixed-methods design, data was collected via qualitative surveys and interviews with teachers, administrators, and students from two suburban elementary schools. Findings indicate teachers generally viewed CBE positively, highlighting benefits such as improved tracking of student mastery, positive classroom climates, and better differentiation. They perceived increased student agency and understanding of learning objectives. Challenges included inconsistencies in assessment and grading, confusion among families and upper elementary teachers regarding the mastery-based system, and insufficient resources. Supportive staff and collaborative environments aided teachers. Students reported mostly positive or neutral perceptions but expressed a desire for greater control and interest incorporation in their learning. Findings suggest a need to enhance student agency through personalized learning, improve family communication about the new grading system, and provide more resources and clearer guidelines for effective CBE implementation, particularly for upper grades. This research offers valuable insight into elementary CBE transitions despite sample size limitations.
Downloads
References
Bergmann, J. (2023). The Mastery Learning Handbook: A Competency-Based Approach to Student Achievement. ASCD.
Bingham, A. J., Adams, M., & Stewart, R. L. (2021). Competency-Based education: Examining educators’ experiences. The Qualitative Report, 26(3), 674-695. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4383
Broderson, M., & Randel, B. (2017). Measuring student progress and teachers’ assessment of student knowledge in a competency-based education system. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572995.pdf
Chen, W. (2023). Gifted education teachers’ concerns about competency-based instruction. Gifted Education International, 39(3), 443-458. 10.1177/02614294221141990
de Prada, M. D. & Gonzáles, J. (2014). Competence-based multiple learning paths: On the road of implementation. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 2(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-2(1)-2014pp107-128
DeVivo, K. (2021, June 9). Roundtable highlights ties between project-based learning and competency-based education, explores new research. Aurora Institute. https://aurora-institute.org/cw_post/roundtable-highlights-ties-between-project-based-learning-and-competency-based-education-explores-new-research/
Evans, C. M., Landl, E., & Thompson, J. (2020). Making sense of k-12 competency-based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Competency-Based Education, 5(4), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1228
Fink, A. (2017). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (6th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Gagnon, L. (2023). Mastery, not time: A look at competency-based education in practice. Childhood Education, 99(5), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2023.2255095
Hamilton, L., Elliott, D., Quick, A., Smith S., & Choplin, V. (2023). Exploring the use of ai in qualitative analysis: A comparative study of guaranteed income data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231201504
Hough, L. (2023). The problem with grading. Harvard Ed., (171), 38-47. https://www.gse.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2023-06/hed19-entireissue.pdf
Klein, A. (2024, September 16). Inside one district’s experiment with competency-based education. Education Week, 44(7), 3-7. https://www.edweek.org/technology/inside-one-districts-experiment-with-competency-based-education/2024/09
Lee, D. (2014). How to personalize learning in K-12 schools: Five essential design features. Educational Technology, 54(3), 12-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430266
Lee, D., Huh, Y., Lin, C., Reigeluth, C. M., & Lee, E. (2021). Differences in personalized learning practice and technology use in high- and low-performing learner-centered schools in the United States. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 1221-1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09937-y
Lee, D., Huh, Y., Lin, C., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2022). Personalized learning practice in U.S. learner-centered schools. Contemporary Education Technology, 14(4), 385.
Levine, E. (2019, May 22). District-wide transformation in Harrisburg, South Dakota. Aurora Institute. https://aurora-institute.org/cw_post/district-wide-transformation-in-harrisburg-south-dakota/
Lopez, N. (2017, September 18). Lessons from a vanguard: A look at Metz Elementary. Aurora Institute. https://aurora-institute.org/cw_post/lessons-from-a-vanguard-a-look-at-metz-elementary/
Loveline, Y. (2024). Project-based learning for enhancing competency-based learning for enhancing competency-based education in primary schools in the Buea, South West Region in Cameroon. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 104-116.
Marion, S., Worthen, M., & Evans, C. (2020). How systems of assessments aligned with competency-based education can support equity. Aurora Institute, 1-28.
Marzano, R. J., Norford, J. S., Finn, M., & Finn III, D. (2017). A handbook for personalized competency-based education. Marzano Resources.
Miller, S., Stallings, S., Massey, D., & Metzger, S. M. (2023). A lesson in motion stays in motion: If students lead, will teachers follow? Phi Delta Kappan, 104(4), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221142984
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabsCenter on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE), DeArmond, M., & Mass, T. (2018). Leading personalized learning. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Morgan, D. (2023). Exploring the use of artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis: The case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248
Pakarinen, E., Imai-Matsumura, K., Yada, A., Yada, T., Leppänen, A., & Lerkkanen, M. (2024).
Child-centered and teacher-directed practices in two different countries: A descriptive case study in Finnish and Japanese grade 1 classrooms. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 38(1), 30-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2188059
Patrick, S. (2021). Transforming learning through competency-based education. State Education Standard, 21(2), 23-29. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=eric&AN=EJ1315095&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=039-820
Ritchie, D. & Thorkildsen, R. (1994). Effects of accountability on students’ achievement in mastery learning. Journal of Educational Research, 88(2), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1994.9944822
Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Siler, K. M. & Quick, A. (2018, February 19). Competency-based education and project-based learning in Johnston County Public Schools. RTI International. https://www.rti.org/impact/competency-based-education-and-project-based-learning-johnston-county-public-schools
Sturgis, C. (2016, April 25). Charleston: A conversation with teachers at Goodwin Elementary School. Aurora Institute. https://aurora-institute.org/cw_post/charleston-a-conversation-with-teachers-at-goodwin-elementary-school/
Tabone, W. & de Winter, J. (2023). Using ChatGPT for human-computer interaction research: A primer. Royal Society Open Science, 10(9), 231053. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anne Davis, Amber Howard (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.