An Evidence-Based, Cross-Sector Competency Framework for Chaplaincy: A Model for CBE with Complex Professions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/cberj.v3no2.24374Keywords:
chaplaincy competencies, evidence-based practice, professional standards, Competency-Based Education (CBE), spiritual careAbstract
Professional chaplaincy is a complex, relational field practiced across diverse institutional contexts, and it remains fragmented in its competency standards, hindering coherent educational and certification models. This study develops and validates a unified, cross-sector competency framework grounded in Competency-Based Education (CBE) principles. Employing a multi-phase design research process, the authors synthesized over a dozen frameworks through a “human-in-the-loop” AI-assisted normalization procedure. The result yielded 36 standardized competencies across six domains, each defined by Observable Performance Indicators. A cross-sector survey of 353 chaplains assessed the importance, frequency of use, and educational preparation for each competency, revealing substantial gaps. The resulting framework, the Center for Chaplaincy Studies (CCS) Competencies, provides theological educators and certifying bodies with a replicable, evidence-based tool for curricular alignment and demonstrates how CBE methodologies can be extended to other fragmented, high-complexity professions.
Downloads
References
Batt, A., Williams, B., Rich, J., & Tavares, W. (2021). A Six-Step Model for Developing Competency Frameworks in the Healthcare Professions. Frontiers in Medicine, 8, 789828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.789828
Borich, G. D. (1980). A needs assessment model for conducting follow-up studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 39–42.
Cadge, W., & Rambo, S. (Eds.). (2022). Chaplaincy and spiritual care in the twenty-first century. University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.1558/hscc.26623.
Chiou, J. S., & Spreng, R. A. (1996). The reliability of difference scores: A re-examination. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 9, 158–167.
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., Boudreau, J. D., Snell, L., & Steinert, Y. (2014). Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 89(11), 1446–1451. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427
DeBacker, D., Kingston, N., Mason, J., Parsons, K., Patelis, T., & Specht-Boardman, R. (2024). A research agenda for competency-based education. Competency-Based Education Research Journal, 1(1). https://journals.ku.edu/cberj/
DeShon, R. P. (2010). Clergy effectiveness: National survey results. General Board of Higher Education and Ministry, The United Methodist Church. https://www.gbhem.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/deshon_2010_umc_clergy_effectiness_survey_report.pdf
Fidler, F., & Cumming, G. (2008). The new stats: Attitudes for the 21st century. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 1–11). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627
Fleenor, D. W., Muehlhausen, B. L., Desjardins, C. M., & Fitchett, G. (2025). Essential competencies for healthcare chaplains: insights from hiring managers and implications for chaplaincy education. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 31(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2024.2399464
Gin, D. H. C., Deasy, J. A., & Pena-Camprubí, G. (2025). Reimagining the role of graduate theological education in clergy formation. Christian Higher Education, 24(2), 148–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2025.2462802
Hafferty F. W. (1998). Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 73(4), 403–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199804000-00013
Hicks, C., Hennessy, D., & Barwell, F. (1996). Development of a psychometrically valid training needs analysis instrument for use with primary health care teams. Health Services Management Research, 9(4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/095148489600900406
Iramaneerat, C., Smith, E. V., Jr., & Smith, R. M. (2008). An introduction to Rasch measurement. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 50–67). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d6
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Markaki, A., Malhotra, S., Billings, R. et al. (2021). Training needs assessment: Tool utilization and global impact. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02748-y
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
Martin, J. R. (1976). What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one? Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179759
Mount, G. R., Kahlke, R., Melton, J., & Varpio, L. (2022). A critical review of professional identity formation interventions in medical education. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 97(11S), S96–S106. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004904
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement, and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Osborne, J. W. (2008). Is disattenuation of effects a best practice? In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 239–245). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d20
Peter, J. P., Churchill, G. A., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1086/209329
Roth, W.-M., Mavin, T., & Dekker, S. (2014). The theory-practice gap: Epistemology, identity, and education. Education & Training (London), 56(6), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2012-0117
Sammons, P., Kysel, F., & Mortimore, P. (1983). Educational priority indices: A new perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 27–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1501200
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
Szilagyi, C., Newitt, M., & Nuzum, D. (2024). Chaplain development in Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) in healthcare settings in England: A mixed methods study. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0310085. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310085
Tackett, S., Ng, C. J., Sugarman, J., Gnanamalar, E., Daniel, S., Gopalan, N., Tivyashinee, Kamarulzaman, A., & Ali, J. (2023). A competency framework for health research ethics educational programs: Results from a stakeholder-driven mixed-method process. Ethics & Human Research, 45(3), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500166
Wang, G. E. (2019, October 20). Humans in the loop: The design of interactive AI systems. Stanford University—HAI. https://hai.stanford.edu/blog/humans-loop-design-interactive-ai-systems
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Callid Keefe-Perry, Zachary Moon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
