The Modernization of Policy-Making Processes in National Sport Organizations: A Case Study of Athletics Canada
Keywords:amateur sport, track and field athletics, national sport organizations
This article explores the consequences of modernization on the policy-making processes of a singular National Sport Organization: Athletics Canada. In drawing upon the works of Green and Houlihan (2005) as a baseline comparison we examine how the organizations’ policy-making processes have changed over a 10-year period (2002-2012). Specifically, our analysis focuses on the nature and extent of these intra-organizational policy-related changes and how they have influenced the organizations’ decision-making capabilities. The descriptive analysis is informed by empirical data collected from eight in-depth semi-structured interviews with senior Athletics Canada personnel and concentrates on three inter-related themes (i) the development and prioritization of OTP-funded policies and programs; and (ii) the development and prioritization of evidence-based policies and programs, which, in turn, has resulted in (iii) increased inter-organizational relationship strain between Athletics Canada and its key delivery partners. More broadly, our investigation contributes to recent amateur sport scholarship that has sought to better understand how these broader socio-political shifts have influenced the specific decision-making processes of sport organizations.
Adams, A. (2011). Between modernization and mutual aid: the changing perceptions of voluntary sports clubs in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3, 23-43. doi:10/1080/19406940.2010.54463
Athletics Canada (n.d.a). Athlete Assistance Program (carding). Retrieved January 14, 2013, from http://www.athletics.ca/page.asp?id=155
Athletics Canada (n.d.b). History. Retrieved November 9, 2012, from http://www.athletics.ca/page.asp?id=44
Athletics Canada (n.d.c). Who we are. Retrieved November 9, 2012, from http://www.athletics.ca/page.asp?id=9
Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. (2nd Edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
De Bosscher, V., De Knop, P., Van Bottenburg, M., & Shibli, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for analysing sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6, 185-215. doi:10.1080/16184740600955087
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32. doi:D10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
Finlayson, A. (2003).The meaning of modernization. Soundings, 23, 62-83.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
Goodwin, M., & Grix, J. (2011). Bringing structures back in: the ‘governance narrative’, the ‘decentred approach’ and ‘asymmetrical network governance’ in the education and sport policy communities. Public Administration, 89(2), 537-556.
Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2010). Research methods for sport studies (2nd Edn.). London: Routledge.
Green, M. (2004). Changing policy priorities for sport in England: the emergence of elite sport development as a key policy concern. Leisure Studies, 23(4), 365-385.
Green, M. (2007). Policy transfer, lesson drawing and perspective on elite sport development systems. International Journal of Sport Marketing and Management, 2(4), 426-441. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2007.013715
Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2005). Elite sport development: Policy learning and political priorities. London: Routledge.
Grix, J. (2010). The ‘governance debate’ and the study of sport policy. International Journal of Sport Policy, 2(2), 159-171.
Grix, J., & Carmichael, F. (2012). Why do governments invest in elite sport? A polemic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4, 73-90.
Grix, J., & Parker, A. (2011). Towards an explanation for the decline of athletics in the UK: A case study of male distance running. Sport in Society, 14(5), 612-628.
Grix, J., & Phillpots, L. (2011). Revisiting the ‘Governance Narrative’ ‘Asymmetrical Network Governance’ and the Deviant Case of the Sports Policy Sector. Public policy and administration, 26(1), 3-19.
Houlihan, B., & Green, M (Eds) (2008). Comparative elite sport development: systems, structures and public policy. Oxford: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2009). Modernization and sport: The reform of Sport England and UK Sport. Public Administration, 87, 678-698. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01733.x
Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2007). Sport governance. (Eds.). Oxford: Elsevier
Kikulis, L. M. (2000). Continuity and change in governance and decision making in national sport organizations: Institutional explanations. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 293-320.
Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1992). Institutionally specific design archetypes: A framework for understanding change in national sport organizations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 27, 343-368. doi:10.1177/101269029202700405
Macintosh, D., Bedecki, T., & Franks, C. E. S. (1987). Sport and politics in Canada: Federal government involvement since 1961. Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Macintosh, D., & Whitson, D. (1990). The game planners: Transforming Canada's sport system. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
O'Brien, D., & Slack, T. (2003). An analysis of change in an organizational field: The professionalization of English rugby union. Journal of Sport Management, 17, 417-448.
O'Brien, D., & Slack, T. (2004). The emergence of a professional logic in English rugby union: The role of isomorphic and diffusion processes. Journal of Sport Management, 18, 13-39.
Own the Podium. (n.d.a). About OTP. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from http://ownthepodium.org/About/
Own the Podium. (n.d.b). Summer Historical Comparison. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from http://ownthepodium.org/Funding/Summer-Historical-Comparison.aspx
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Phillpots, L., Grix, J., & Quarmby, T. (2011). Centralized grassroots sport policy and ‘new governance’: A case study of County Sports Partnerships in the UK–unpacking the paradox. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 265-281.
Priestner Allinger, C., & Allinger, T. (2004). Own the Podium: 2010 final report. Retrieved from: http://www.sportmatters.ca/files/Groups/SMG%20Resources/Sport%20and%20PA
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sam, M. P. (2009). The Public Management of Sport. Public Management Review, 11(4), 499-514.
Sam, M. P. (2011). Building legitimacy at Sport Canada: pitfalls of public value creation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 757-778.
Shilbury, D., & Ferkins, L. (2011). Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing Leisure, 16(2), 108-127.
Skinner, J., Stewart, B., & Edwards, A. (1999). Amateurism to professionalism: Modelling organisational change in sporting organisations. Sport Management Review, 2, 173-192. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(99)70095-1
Slack, T. (Ed) (2004). The commercialisation of sport. London: Routledge.
Slack, T., Berrett, T., & Mistry, K. (1994). Rational planning systems as a source of organizational conflict. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 29, 317-328. doi:10.1177/101269029402900306
Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization Studies, 15, 803-827. doi:10.1177/017084069401500602
Thibault, L., & Harvey, J. (Eds.). (2013). Sport policy in Canada. Ottawa: Ottawa University Press.
Thibault, L., Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1991). Professionalism, structures and systems: The impact of professional staff on voluntary sport organizations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 26, 83-98. doi:10.1177/101269029102600202
Truyens, J., De Bosscher, V., & Heyndels, B., & Westerbeek, H. (2014). A resource-based perspective on countries’ competitive advantage in elite athletics, 6(3), 459-489. doi: 10.1080/19406940.2013.839954
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Washington, M., & Patterson, K. (2011). Hostile takeover or joint venture? Connections between institutional theory and sport management research, 14, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2010.06.003
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) License
1. License. You retain the copyright for your work. You here by grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, sublicensable license to:
• Reproduce, distribute and display the edited manuscript in the Journal of Amateur Sport (and other publications prepared by us or on our behalf) in any media now or hereafter known (including without limitation electronic publications such as the Internet, Google Scholar, and social media)
We do not restrict your distribution or use of the manuscript following publication in the Journal of Amateur Sport (in fact, we encourage it!). However, we have the right to publish the manuscript first on the journal website. Thus, the foregoing licenses are exclusive to us prior to our publication of the manuscript. You confirm that you have disclosed to us all previous or pending public disseminations of the manuscript, including without limitation any publications or acceptances by other journals or disseminations via websites or conference proceedings.
2. Other Confirmations. You confirm that you are the manuscripts sole author(s); you have the right to convey the foregoing licenses; the manuscript does not infringe any third party copyright, publicity/privacy right or other proprietary right; and the manuscript is not defamatory or otherwise unlawful. You shall defend and indemnify us against all claims based on any alleged breach of your confirmations in this contract.
Compensation: You will receive one (1) free copy (PDF) of the article published online in the Journal of Amateur Sport. You will receive no royalty or other monetary return from the Journal of Amateur Sport for use of the article. You do, however, have our extreme gratitude!
3. Entire Contract. This contract is the sole and exclusive agreement between the parties regarding the manuscript and supersedes all prior conversations and understandings regarding its subject matter. This contract may be modified or supplemented only by a mutually signed writing.