College Athletics Spending: Principals and Agents v. Arms Race
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jas.v2i1.5673Abstract
It is widely held that collegiate athletic directors are trapped in an expenditure arms race. But the arms race explanation completely omits the actual consideration of the university budgeting process. In its place, the arms race logic imposes strained assumptions about the cooperative setting and the naïveté of university administrators, along with a curious distinction of one type of revenue to reach its conclusions. And the interpretation of the data on spending and benefits from college sports has not been done particularly well in the past. This paper presents an alternative principal-agent explanation that is based on the observed actual financial (budget) relationship between university administrators and their athletic department and consistent with the entirety of the aggregate-level data on college athletics finance. Empirically discerning between the two models is crucial since each generates decidedly different policy implications.
References
Abrams, P.A. 1986. “Adaptive Responses of Predator to Prey and Prey to Predators: The Failure of the Arms Race Analogy.” Evolution 40, 1229-1247.
Arce, D.G., and Sandler, M.T. 2005. “The Dilemma of the Prisoners’ Dilemmas.” Kyklos 58, 3-24.
Brewer, R.M., McEvoy, C.D., and Pops, N. 2014. “Predicting Intrinsic Value of NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball Coaching Salaries.” Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics 8, 74-91.
Cooper, J.N., Cavil, J.K., and Cheeks, G. 2014. “The State of Intercollegiate Athletics at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HCBUs): Past, Present, & Persistence.” Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics 7, 307-332.
Cross, M. 2015. Ultimate Sports Insider. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.ultimatesportsinsider.com
Dixit, A. 2006. “Thomas Schelling’s Contributions to Game Theory.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108, 213-229.
Drake Group. 2015. “Position Statement: Student Fee and Institutional Subsidy Allocations to Fund Intercollegiate Athletics.” March 2. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at https://drakegroupblog.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/position-statement-student-fees-final-3-2-15.pdf
Edwards, H. 1984. "The Collegiate Athletic Arms Race: Origins and Implications of the 'Rule 48' Controversy." Journal of Sport and Social Issues 8, 4-22.
ESPN.com News Services. 2009a. “Too Costly, Football Done at Northeastern.” November 30. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://sports.espn.go.com/boston/ncf/news/story?id=4681701
ESPN.com News Services. 2009b. “Hofstra Drops Football after 69 Seasons.” December 3. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4709412
Fort, R. 2010. “An Economic Look at the Sustainability of FBS Athletic Departments.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 3, 3-21.
Fort, R., and Winfree, J. 2013. 15 Sports Myths and Why They’re Wrong. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Frank, R.H. 2004. “Challenging the Myth: A Review of the Links among College Athletic Success, Student Quality, and Donations.” Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. May. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.knightcommission.org/images/pdfs/kcia_frank_report_2004.pdf
Fulks, D.L. 2015. Revenues & Expenses 2004-08 NCAA Division I Intercollegiate Athletic Programs Report. September. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Fuoco, M.A. 2010. “Colleges Questioning Steep Price of Winning in Sports.” Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09347/1020599-449.stm
Goff, B. 2004. “Effects of University Athletics on the University: A Review and Extension of Empirical Assessment.” In J. Fizel and R. Fort (eds.) Economics of College Sports. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 65-86.
G. Gurey. 2014. “President’s Message.” The Drake Group, Inc. September 29, 2015 at http://thedrakegroup.org/presidents-message
Hoffer, A., Humphreys, B.R., Lacombe, D.J., and Ruseski, J. 2015. “Trends in NCAA Athletics Spending: Arms Race or Rising Tide?” Journal of Sports Economics 16, 576-596.
Hoffer, A., and Pincin, J.A. 2016. “The Effects of Revenue Changes on NCAA Athletic Departments’ Expenditures.” Journal of Sport & Social Issues 40, 82-102.
Huml, M.R., Hancock, M.G., and Bergman, M.J. 2014. “Additional Support or Extravagant Cost? Student-Athletes’ Perceptions on Athletic Academic Centers.” Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics 7, 410-430.
Humphreys, B.R. 2006. “The Relationship between Big-Time College Football and State Appropriations to Higher Education.” International Journal of Sport Finance 1, 151-161.
Humphreys, B.R., and Mondello, M. 2007. “Intercollegiate Athletic Success and Donations at NCAA Division I Institutions.” Journal of Sport Management 21, 265-280.
Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. 2001. “A Call to Action: Reconnecting College Sports and Higher Education.” June. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.knightcommission.org/images/pdfs/2001_knight_report.pdf
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. 2004. “New Study Debunks Link Among Winning College Athletic Programs and Increases in Donations and Quality of Applicants.” September 7. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.knightcommission.org/resources/press-room/790-september-7-2004-new-study-debunks-link-among-winning-college-athletic-programs-and-increases-in-donations-and-quality-of-applicants
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. 2009. “Quantitative and Qualitative Research with Football Bowl Subdivision University Presidents on the Costs and Financing of Intercollegiate Athletics: Report of Findings and Implications.” October. Last viewed on line, September 29, 2015 at http://www.knightcommissionmedia.org/images/President_Survey_FINAL.pdf
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. 2010a. “College Sports 101: A Primer on Money, Athletics, and Higher Education in the 21st Century.” Chapter 2: Expenses. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.knightcommission.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=366&Itemid=86
Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. 2010b. “College Sports 101: A Primer on Money, Athletics, and Higher Education in the 21st Century.” Chapter 9: Conclusion. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.knightcommission.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=374&Itemid=94
Lanter, J.R., and Hawkins, B.J. 2013. “The Economic Model of Intercollegiate Athletics and Its Effects on the College Athlete Educational Experience.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 6, 86-95.
Niskanen, W.A., Jr. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Aldine Atherton.
Orszag, J.M., and Orszag, P.R. 2005a. “The Physical Capital Stock Used in Collegiate Athletics.” April. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/physical_capital_stock_used_in_collegiate_athletics.pdf
Orszag, J.M., and Orszag, P.R. 2005b. “The Empirical Effects of Collegiate Athletics: An Update.” April. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/empirical_effects_of_collegiate_athletics_update.pdf
Ross, S.A. 1973. “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem. American Economic Review 62, 134-139.
Sagas, M., and Wigley, B.J. 2014. “Gray Area Ethical Leadership in the NCAA: The Ethics of Doing the Wrong Things Right.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 7, 40-57.
Sanderson, J., Hardin, R., and Pate, J. 2014. “Embracing the Culture of Winning in Big-Time College Football: Exploring How and Reinforce Coaching Power.” Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics 7, 114-131.
Shubik, M. 1971. “The Dollar Auction Game: A Paradox in Noncooperative Behavior and Escalation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 15, 109–111.
Smith,D.R. 2008. “Big-Time College Basketball and the Advertising Effect: Does Success Really Matter?” Journal of Sports Economics 9, 387-406.
Sparvero, E.S., and Warner, S. 2013. “The Price of Winning and the Impact on the NCAA Community.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 6, 120-142.
Stafford, L. 2010. “College Sports ‘Arms Race’ Not Sustainable, Say University Presidents.” Atlanta Journal Constitution. Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.ajc.com/sports/college-sports-arms-race-273700.html
Staurowsky, E.J., Murray, K., Puzio, M., and Quagliariello, J. 2013. “Revisiting James Madison University: A Case Analysis of Program Restructuring Following So Called ‘Title IX’ Cuts.” Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 6, 96-119.
Tsitsos, W., and Nixon, H.L. 2012. The Star Wars Arms Race in College Athletics: Coaches’ Pay and Athletic Program Status. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 36, 68-88.
Tucker, I.B. 2004. “A Reexamination of the Effect of Big-Time Football and Basketball Success on Graduation Rates and Alumni Giving Rates.” Economics of Education Review 23, 665-661.
Tucker, I.B. 2005. “Big-Time Pigskin Success.” Journal of Sports Economics 6, 222-229.
Tucker, I.B., and Amato, L.T. 2006. “A Reinvestigation of the Relationship Between Big-Time Basketball Success and Average SAT Scores.” Journal of Sports Economics 7, 428-440.
Weight, E., Navarro, K., Huffman, and Smith-Ryan, A. 2014. “Quantifying the Psychological Benefits of Intercollegiate Athletics Participation.” Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics 7, 390-409.
Weight, E.A., Weight, M.A., and Schneider, R.G. 2013. “Confronting the Arms Race: Conference Commissioner Perspectives on Spending within Intercollegiate Athletics.” International Journal of Sport Management 14, 441-461.
Weingast, B.R. 1984. “The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal Agent Perspective (with Applications to the SEC).” Public Choice 44, 147-191.
Weingast, B.R., and Moran, M.J. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy 91, 765-800.
Women’s Sports Foundation. 2008. “Dropping Men's Sports - The Division I Football/Basketball Arms Race is The Culprit in the Cutting of Men's Olympic Sports: The Foundation Position.” Last viewed on line September 29, 2015 at http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/home/advocate/title-ix-and-issues/title-ix-positions/football_basketball_arms_race
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) License
1. License. You retain the copyright for your work. You here by grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, sublicensable license to:
• Reproduce, distribute and display the edited manuscript in the Journal of Amateur Sport (and other publications prepared by us or on our behalf) in any media now or hereafter known (including without limitation electronic publications such as the Internet, Google Scholar, and social media)
We do not restrict your distribution or use of the manuscript following publication in the Journal of Amateur Sport (in fact, we encourage it!). However, we have the right to publish the manuscript first on the journal website. Thus, the foregoing licenses are exclusive to us prior to our publication of the manuscript. You confirm that you have disclosed to us all previous or pending public disseminations of the manuscript, including without limitation any publications or acceptances by other journals or disseminations via websites or conference proceedings.
2. Other Confirmations. You confirm that you are the manuscripts sole author(s); you have the right to convey the foregoing licenses; the manuscript does not infringe any third party copyright, publicity/privacy right or other proprietary right; and the manuscript is not defamatory or otherwise unlawful. You shall defend and indemnify us against all claims based on any alleged breach of your confirmations in this contract.
Compensation: You will receive one (1) free copy (PDF) of the article published online in the Journal of Amateur Sport. You will receive no royalty or other monetary return from the Journal of Amateur Sport for use of the article. You do, however, have our extreme gratitude!
3. Entire Contract. This contract is the sole and exclusive agreement between the parties regarding the manuscript and supersedes all prior conversations and understandings regarding its subject matter. This contract may be modified or supplemented only by a mutually signed writing.
