Examining social media adoption and change to the stakeholder communication paradigm in not-for-profit sport organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jas.v3i2.6492Keywords:
social media, organizational change, national sport organizationsAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine social media adoption within not-for-profit sport organizations to illuminate the impetus for change, the type of change undertaken, and change resistance. Using a contextualist approach depicting the external and internal forces as well as the change process, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten Canadian national sport organizations (NSO) representing varying degrees of social media presence. The findings suggest that, although social media is espoused as a radical, transformational vehicle, NSOs have only made incremental adjustments to their stakeholder communication and have situated social media within their extant organizational condition due to capacity constraints and resistance from staff and reticent stakeholders. Adopting social media in light of limited organizational capacity thus diminishes the utility of the communications tool. Theoretical and practical implications include how to improve social media-related capacity and the importance of continuing the social media and sport domain’s organizational theory agenda.References
Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2004a). Strategic change and the role of interests, power, and organizational capacity. Journal of Sport Management, 18, 158-198.
Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2004b). The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 15-39. doi: 10.2307/20159558
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293-315. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500303
Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 152-170. doi: 10.2307/257024
Burgelman, R. A. (1991). Intraorganizaitonal ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2, 239-262. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.3.239
Burgers, C. (2016). Conceptualizing change in communication through metaphor. Journal of Communication, 66, 250-265. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12211
Caza, A. (2000). Context receptivity: Innovation in an amateur sport organization. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 227-242.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
Cunningham, G. B. (2002). Removing the blinders: Toward an integrative model of organizational change in sport and physical activity. Quest, 54, 276-291. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2002.104917779
Dawson, P. (2003). Reshaping change: A processual perspective. London, England: Routledge.
Eagleman, A. N. (2013). Acceptance, motivations, and usage of social media as a marketing communications tool amongst employees of sport national governing bodies. Sport Management Review, 16, 488-497. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2013.03.004
Filo, K., Lock, D., & Karg, A. (2015). Sport and social media research: A review. Sport Management Review, 18, 166-181. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2014.11.001
Girginov, V., & Sandanski, I. (2008). Understanding the changing nature of sports organisations in transforming societies. Sport Management Review, 11, 21-50. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(08)70102-5
Girginov, V., Taks, M., Boucher, B., Martyn, S., Holman, M., & Dixon, J. (2009). Canadian national sport organizations’ use of the web for relationship marketing in promoting sport participation. International Journal of Sport Communication, 2, 164-184.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022-1054.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164.
Hill, L., & Kikulis, L. M. (1999). Contemplating restricting: A case study of strategic decision making in interuniversity athletic conferences. Journal of Sport Management, 13, 18-44.
Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7-41. doi: 10.2307/256350
Jaffe, D., Scott, C., & Tobe, G. (1994). Rekindling commitment: How to revitalize yourself, your work, and your organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kikulis, L. M. (2000). Continuity and change in governance and decision making in national sport organizations: Institutional explanations. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 293-320.
Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (1995a). Sector-specific patterns of organizational design change. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 67-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00646.x
Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (1995b). Toward an understanding of the role of agency and choice in the changing structure of Canada’s national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 135-152.
Kikulis, L. M., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (1995c). Does decision making make a difference? Patterns of change within Canadian national sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 273-299.
Kimberly, J. R. (1980). The life cycle analogy and the study of organizations: Introduction. In J. R. Kimberly, & R. H. Miles (Eds.), The organizational life cycle (pp. 1-14). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Legg, J., Snelgrove, R., & Wood, L. (2016). Modifying tradition: Examining organizational change in youth sport. Journal of Sport Management, 30, 369-381. doi: 10.1123/jsm.2015-0075
Miller, D., Greenwood, R., & Hinings, B. (1997). Creative chaos versus munificent momentum: The schism between normative and academic views of organizational change. Journal of Management, 6, 71-78. doi: 10.1177/105649269761014
Misener, K., & Doherty, A. (2009). A case study of organizational capacity in nonprofit community sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 457-482.
Naraine, M. L., & Parent, M. M. (2016). “Birds of the same feather:” An institutional approach to Canadian national sport organizations’ social media usage. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9, 140-162. doi: 10.1123/IJSC.2016-0010
O’Brien, D., & Slack, T. (2004). The emergence of a professional logic in English Rugby Union: The role of isomorphic and diffusion processes. Journal of Sport Management, 18, 13-39.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 649-668. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00467.x
Pettigrew, A.M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 697-713. doi: 10.2307/3069411
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Shimizu, K., & Hitt, M. A. (2005). What constrains or facilitates divestitures of formerly acquired firms? The effects of organizational inertia. Journal of Management ,31, 50-72. doi: 10.1177/0149206304271381
Skinner, J., Stewart, B., & Edwards, E. (1999). Amateurism to professionalism: Modelling organisational change in sporting organisations. Sport Management Review, 2, 173-192. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(99)70095-1
Skirstad, B. (2009). Gender policy and organizational change: A contextual approach. Sport Management Review, 12, 202-216. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2009.03.003
Suddaby, R., & Foster, W. M. (2016). History and organizational change. Journal of Management (advance online publication). doi: 10.1177/0149206316675031
Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (1992). Understanding change in national sport organizations: An integration of theoretical perspectives. Journal of Sport Management, 6, 114-132.
Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Stronach, M., & Adair, D. (2009). ‘Brave new world’ or ‘sticky wicket’? Women, management and organizational power in Cricket Australia. Sport in Society, 12, 910-932. doi: 10.1080/17430430903053174
Thibault, L., & Babiak, K. (2005). Organisational changes in Canada’s sport system: Toward an athlete-centred approach. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5, 105-132. doi: 10.1080/16184740500188623
Thompson, A. J., Martin, A. J., Gee, S., & Eagleman, A. N. (2014). Examining the development of a social media strategy for a national sport organization: A case study of Tennis New Zealand. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 6, 42-63.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 8-30. doi: 10.2307/41165852
Waters, R. D., Burke, K. A., Jackson, Z. H., & Buning, J. D. (2011). Using stewardship to cultivate fandom online: Comparing how National Football League teams use their web sites and Facebook to engage their fans. International Journal of Sport Communication, 4, 163-177.
Wells, K. J. (2016). Work-family initiatives from an organizational change lens. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 215-228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Welty Peachey, J., & Bruening, J. (2011). An examination of environmental factors driving change and stakeholder responses in a Football Championships Subdivision athletic department. Sport Management Review, 14, 202-219. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2010.03.002
Williams, J., & Chinn, S. J. (2010). Meeting relationship-marketing goals through social media: A conceptual model for sport marketers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 422-437.
Yi, S., Knudsen, T., & Becker, M. C. (2016). Inertia in routines: A hidden source of organizational variation. Organization Science, 27, 782-800. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2016.1059
Ybema, S., Thomas, R., & Hardy, C. (2016). Organizational change and resistance: An identity perspective. In D. Courpasson, & S. Vallas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of resistance (pp. 386-404). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Zakus, D. H., & Skinner, J. (2008). Modelling organizational change in the International Olympic Committee. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8, 421-442. doi: 10.1080/16184740802461660
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) License
1. License. You retain the copyright for your work. You here by grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, sublicensable license to:
• Reproduce, distribute and display the edited manuscript in the Journal of Amateur Sport (and other publications prepared by us or on our behalf) in any media now or hereafter known (including without limitation electronic publications such as the Internet, Google Scholar, and social media)
We do not restrict your distribution or use of the manuscript following publication in the Journal of Amateur Sport (in fact, we encourage it!). However, we have the right to publish the manuscript first on the journal website. Thus, the foregoing licenses are exclusive to us prior to our publication of the manuscript. You confirm that you have disclosed to us all previous or pending public disseminations of the manuscript, including without limitation any publications or acceptances by other journals or disseminations via websites or conference proceedings.
2. Other Confirmations. You confirm that you are the manuscripts sole author(s); you have the right to convey the foregoing licenses; the manuscript does not infringe any third party copyright, publicity/privacy right or other proprietary right; and the manuscript is not defamatory or otherwise unlawful. You shall defend and indemnify us against all claims based on any alleged breach of your confirmations in this contract.
Compensation: You will receive one (1) free copy (PDF) of the article published online in the Journal of Amateur Sport. You will receive no royalty or other monetary return from the Journal of Amateur Sport for use of the article. You do, however, have our extreme gratitude!
3. Entire Contract. This contract is the sole and exclusive agreement between the parties regarding the manuscript and supersedes all prior conversations and understandings regarding its subject matter. This contract may be modified or supplemented only by a mutually signed writing.
