Teaching in the Montessori Classroom
Investigating Variation Theory and Embodiment as a Foundation of Teachers’ Development
Keywords:Montessori, embodiment, geometry material, mathematics, teachers' development, variation theory
The theory of Montessori education has been interpreted by some researchers to be vaguely formulated. However, as shown in previous research, Maria Montessori’s didactic approach to teaching and learning mathematics is fully consistent with variation theory and the theory of embodiment. Dr. Montessori used the theoretical concept of isolation of quality, which means that the learning objects have to be kept identical except for one variable, which has to differ to be perceptible. This concept is in alignment with variation theory, which emphasizes variation as a necessary condition for learners to discern aspects of an object of learning. The other theory applied in this article is the theory of embodiment: important cognitive functions are fundamentally grounded in action that is concordant with Dr. Montessori’s view that mind and movement are parts of the same entity.
This article reports on a qualitative single-case study with a formative intention in which we investigated the significance of being acquainted with variation theory and the theory of embodiment when working with Montessori material. The study analyzes a teacher’s mathematics presentations with the Montessori material and the children’s work with this material, using Epistemological Move Analysis, which focuses on how the teacher directs children’s learning. The analysis was shared with the teacher to support her awareness of the ways teaching can be developed from a variation and embodiment theoretical perspective. Results show that the teacher’s awareness of why a specific learning object be treated in accordance with variation theory and embodiment seems to promote a more constructive and effective way to direct children’s learning.
Ahlquist, E.-M. T., & Gynther, P. (2019). Variation theory and Montessori education. Journal of Montessori Research & Education, 2(1), 13–23. http://doi.org/10.16993/jmre.12
Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Information Age.
Blatchford, P. (2003). A systematic observational study of teachers’ and pupils’ behavior in large and small classes. Learning and Instruction, 13(6), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00043-9
Cossentino, J. (2009). Culture, craft, & coherence: The unexpected vitality of Montessori teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109344593
Feez, S. (2007). Montessori’s mediation of meaning: A social semiotic perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney]. Sydney Digital Theses (Open Access). http://hdl.handle.net/2123/1859
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20092
Littler, G., & Jirotková, D. (2004). Learning about solids. In B. Clarke & National Center for Mathematics Education (Eds.), International perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 51–66). Göteborg University, National Center for Mathematics Education.
Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. Oxford University Press.
Lithner, J. (2015). Learning mathematics by imitative or creative reasoning. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 487–506). Springer International Publishing.
Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2012). Institutional traditions in teachers’ manners of teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9375-x
Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 501–539. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3
Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. Routledge.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marton, F., & Signert, K. (2008). Sinnenas skolning—variation och invarians i Maria Montessoris pedagogik [Educating the senses—variation and invariance in Maria Montessori’s pedagogy]. In H. Rystedt & R. Säljö (Eds.), Kunskap och människans redskap: Teknik och lärande [Knowledge and human tools: Technology and learning] (pp. 179–194). Studentlitteratur AB.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori Method. Schocken. (Original work published 1912)
Montessori, M. (1965). Dr. Montessori’s own handbook. Schocken. (Original work published 1914)
Montessori, M. (1972). The discovery of the child. Ballantine. (Original work published 1948)
Montessori, M. (1982). The absorbent mind. Kalakshetra. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (1996). From childhood to adolescence. Montessori-Pierson. (Original work published 1948)
Montessori, M. (2011). Psychogeometry. Montessori-Pierson.
Montessori, M. M., Jr. (1992). Education for human development: Understanding Montessori (ED136940). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED136940.pdf
Mwingirwa, M. I., Marguerite, M. K., & Khatete, D. (2015). Teachers’ perspectives towards use of technology, the case of GeoGebra in teaching mathematics in Kenya. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), III, (IX), 19–24.
Signert, K. (2012). Variation och invarians i Maria Montessoris sinnestränande materiel. [Variation and invariance in Maria Montessori’s sensory training materials] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Sweden]. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/30158/2/gupea_2077_30158_2.pdf
Wiliam, D. (2019). Att följa lärande: Formativ bedömning i praktiken [Embedded formative assessment] (2nd ed.). Studentlitteratur AB.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.) SAGE Publications.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK