Leading Reflective Practices in Montessori Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v7i1.14832Keywords:
instructional supervision, Montessori leadership, educational leadership, school administrationAbstract
In this paper, we report the results of a qualitative study examining the development of leadership competencies as Montessori school leaders gain experience using a coaching protocol with their teachers. Extending previous work, the emphasis is on the school leaders’ specific roles as instructional supervisors leading reflective practices. National standards, both traditional and Montessori, are a foundation to investigate a group of Montessori school leaders’ development in reference to articulated competencies, specifically for the school leader to tend to their own learning and effectiveness through reflection, study, and improvement, and to empower teachers to the highest levels of professional practice and to continuous learning and improvement. After the use of a prescribed coaching protocol, 12 Montessori school leaders from 6 schools across the United States were interviewed using a set of semistructured questions. The study results support that reflective practices lead to both improvement of practice with this group of Montessori school leaders and their respective teachers. We conclude that self-reflection is critical to a Montessori leader’s success, empowering them to model and influence reflective practices, with direct impacts on teacher reflection and school improvement. This conclusion becomes relevant as we observe our Montessori school leaders assuming numerous and complicated administrative roles, from management and teacher evaluation to instructional supervision, mentoring, and coaching teachers.
References
Aguilar, E. (2013). The art of coaching. Jossey-Bass.
American Montessori Society. (2018). American Montessori Society school accreditation standards and criteria. https://amshq.org/Educators/Montessori-Schools/AMS-Accreditation/Accreditation-Standards
American Montessori Society. (2019). American Montessori Society. https://amshq.org/About-Montessori/History-of-Montessori/Who-Was-Maria-Montessori/Maria-Montessori-Quotes
American Montessori Society. (2021). Pathway of continuous school improvement: An invitation for member schools to engage with Montessori quality. https://amshq.org/Educators/Montessori-Schools/Pathway-of-Continuous-School-Improvement
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
Bagby, J., & Sulak, T. (2013). Connecting leadership development to Montessori practice. Montessori Life, 25(1), 6–7.
Bennetts, K., & Bone, J. (2020). Montessori literature through the lens of leadership. Journal of Montessori Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v6i2.13537
Bhata, P. (2019). The Montessori differences: Understanding its essential elements. Tomorrow’s Child. 12–14.
Bogdan, R., & Biklin, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to the theories and models (5th ed.). Pearson.
Bouchamma, Y., & Basque, M. (2012). Supervision practices of school principals: Reflection in action (ED535512). ERIC. US–China Education Review B, 7, 627–637. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535512.pdf
Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2012). Facilitating reflective learning, coaching and supervision (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.
Caffarella, R. S., & Daffron, S. R. (2013). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide. Jossey- Bass.
Clark, R. W. (1999). Effective professional development schools. Agenda for Education in Democracy Series. Volume 3. Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Damore, S., & Rieckhoff, B. (2019). School leader perceptions: Coaching tool and process. Journal of Research in Leadership Education, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119868258
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D. C. Heath.
Drago-Severson, E., Blum-DeStefano, J., & Asghar, A. (2013). Learning for leadership: Development strategies for building capacity for schools. Corwin Press.
Elliot, V., & Shiff, S. (2001). A look within: Staff development using structure, inquiry, and reflection to examine feelings about equity. Journal of Staff Development, 22(2), 39–42.
Epstein, P. (2011). An observer’s notebook - learning from children with observation C.O.R.E. (2nd ed.). The Montessori Foundation Press.
Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (4th ed.). Pearson.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2006). Composing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002
Houchens, G. W., & Keedy, J. (2009). Theories of practice: Understanding the practice of leadership. TopSCHOLAR: The Research & Creative Activity Database of Western Kentucky University. Journal of Thought, 44, 49–66. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ed_leader_fac_pubs/3/
Houchens, G. W., Stewart, T. A., & Jennings, S. (2017). Enhancing instructional leadership through collaborative coaching: A multi-case study. International Journal of Mentoring & Coaching in Education, 6(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2016-0057
Kapustka, K., & Damore, S. (2012, April 13–17). “How did your students learn? How do you know?” Helping student teachers articulate student learning [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Knight, J. (2019). Why teacher autonomy is central to coaching success. Educational Leadership, 77(3), 14– 20. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov19/vol77/num03/Why-Teacher-Autonomy-Is-Central-to-Coaching-Success.aspx
Lillard, A. S. (2017). Montessori: The science behind the genius (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Meier, D. R., & Henderson, B. (2007). Learning from young children in the classroom: The art and science of teacher research. Teachers College Press.
Montessori, M. (1970). How it all happened: Summary of a talk to her students on January 6, 1942, describing first the Casa dei Bambini. Communications: Journal of the Association Montessori Internationale, 2/3, 2–7. https://m.montessoriteacherscollective.com/montessori-lectures/
Montessori, M. (1984). The absorbent mind. (C.A. Claremont, Trans.). Dell Publishing. (Original work published 1949)
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders. Author.
Nolan, J., Jr., & Hoover, L. A. (2008). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice. John Wiley and Sons.
Rieckhoff, B., & Damore, S. (2017). Beyond Charlotte: Reflection for continuous improvement. Journal of Practitioner Research, 2(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.5038/2379-9951.2.1.1044
Saylor, L., McKenzie, G., & Cebulski-Sacco, C. (2018). Teacher-centered mentorship as meaningful professional Montessori development. Journal of Montessori Research, 4(2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v4i2.6923
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Berrett-Koehler.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N. H., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline field book for educators, parents, and ev¬eryone who cares about education (2nd ed.). Currency.
Steiner, M. (2016). Freeing up teachers to learn: A case study of teacher autonomy as a tool for reducing in¬equalities in a Montessori school. Forum, 58(3), 421– 427. https://doi.org/10.15730/forum.2016.58.3.421
Teitel, L. (2003). The professional development schools handbook: Starting, sustaining, and assessing partner¬ships that improve student learning. Corwin Press.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gaereis, C. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Ad¬ministration, 53(1), 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024
Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Dana, N. (2007). The reflective educator’s guide to mentoring: Strengthening practice through knowledge, story and metaphor. Corwin Press.
York-Barr, J., Sommers, W., Ghere, G., & Montie, J. (2016). Reflective practice for renewing schools: An action guide for educators. Corwin Press.
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 5(1), 1–6. https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/download/165/158
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dr. Sharon Damore, Dr. Barbara Rieckhoff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
Author Agreement
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK
