Children with Disabilities Attending Montessori Programs in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v8i2.18639Keywords:
disabilities, Montessori programs, young childrenAbstract
Early childhood education plays a critical role in establishing positive social-emotional behaviors and promoting the development of skills needed to succeed in elementary school. Although inclusion of children with disabilities (CWD) in early childhood classrooms is increasing throughout the world, numerous social, logistical, and political factors continue to present challenges to full inclusion. The Montessori educational approach, established at the beginning of the 20th century and now applied widely throughout Europe and the United States, may present a highly suitable learning context for CWD, particularly given its historical basis in efforts to meet the needs of underprivileged and cognitively delayed children. On a theoretical level, the inclusion of CWD should be an accepted practice for Montessori programs yet reports of the number and characteristics of CWD attending Montessori programs are scarce. This paper reports upon the findings of a survey of U.S. Montessori early childhood programs’ current enrollment of CWD. The survey indicated that CWD represent 3.75% of the infant and toddler (0–3 years) population and 8.49% of the preschool/early childhood (3–6 years) population at responding institutions. Additionally, although school directors indicate that their teachers generally feel confident and competent including CWD in their classrooms, they expressed a need for ongoing professional development and additional support from special education experts to further empower the inclusion of CWD in all aspects of Montessori education.
References
Akkerman, A. (2014). Benefits of movement in a Montessori classroom on children’s behavior and focus [Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin‐River Falls]. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/69424/AbbyAkkerman.pdf
Alenizi, M. A. (2019). Effectiveness of a program based on a multi-sensory strategy in developing visual Perception of primary school learners with learning disabilities: A contextual study of Arabic learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 72–104. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346
American Montessori Society. (n.d.). 5 core components of Montessori education. American Montessori Society. https://amshq.org/About-Montessori/What-Is-Montessori/Core-Components-of-Montessori
AuCoin, D., & Berger, B. (2021). An expansion of practice: Special education and Montessori public school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1931717
Bertollo, J. R., & Yerys, B. E. (2019). More than IQ: Executive function explains adaptive behavior above and beyond nonverbal IQ in youth with autism and lower IQ. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.3.191
Brown, D. M., Ross, T., Leo, J., Buliung, R. N., Shirazipour, C. H., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P. (2021). A scoping review of evidence-informed recommendations for designing inclusive playgrounds. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 2, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.664595
Carter, E. W., Gustafson, J. R., Sreckovic, M. A., Dykstra Steinbrenner, J. R., Pierce, N. P., Bord, A., Stabel, A., Rogers, S., Czerw, A., & Mullins, T. (2017). Efficacy of peer support interventions in general education classrooms for high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 38(4), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516672067
Chaffin, M. E. (2019, October 30). What about students with special needs? The Montessori Post. https://www.montessoripost.com/2019/10/30/what-about-students-with-special-needs/
Chang, Y.-C., & Locke, J. (2016). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 1–10. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.03.010
Culclasure, B., Fleming, D. J., Riga, G., & Sprogis, A. (2018). An evaluation of Montessori education in South Carolina’s public schools. The Riley Institute at Furman University. https://www.furman.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/195/rileypdfFiles/MontessoriOverallResultsFINAL.pdf
Danner, N., & Fowler, S. (2015). Montessori and non-Montessori early childhood teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and access. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4944
Denervaud, S., Knebel, J.-F., Hagmann, P., & Gentaz, E. (2019). Beyond executive functions, creativity skills benefit academic outcomes: Insights from Montessori education. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0225319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225319
Di Lieto, M. C., Castro, E., Pecini, C., Inguaggiato, E., Cecchi, F., Dario, P., Cioni, G., & Sgandurra, G. (2020). Improving executive functions at school in children with special needs by educational robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02813
Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices. Council for Exceptional Children, Division for Early Childhood. https://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
Dogru, S. S. Y. (2015). Efficacy of Montessori education in attention gathering skill of children. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(6), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2080
Epstein, A. (1997). How teachers accommodate for young children with special needs. Montessori Life, 9(3), 32–34.
Epstein, A. (1998). “The behavior part is the hardest”: Montessori teachers and young children with challenging behaviors. Montessori Life, 10(4), 24–25.
García-Carrión, R., Molina Roldán, S., & Roca Campos, E. (2018). Interactive learning environments for the educational improvement of students with disabilities in special schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01744
Gauvreau, A. N., Lohmann, M. J., & Hovey, K. A. (2021). Circle is for everyone: Using UDL to promote inclusion during circle times. Young Exceptional Children, 0(0) https://doi.org/10.1177/10962506211028576
Giangreco, M. F. (2021). Maslow’s hammer: Teacher assistant research and inclusive practices at a crossroads. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2021.1901377
Gkeka, E. G., Gougoudi, Α., Mertsioti, L., & Drigas, A. S. (2018). Intervention for ADHD child using the Montessori method and ICTs. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (IJES), 6(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i2.8729
Güldenpfennig, F., Fikar, P., & Ganhör, R. (2018). Interactive and open-ended sensory toys: Designing with therapists and children for tangible and visual interaction. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173247
Gunning, C., Breathnach, Ó., Holloway, J., McTiernan, A., & Malone, B. (2019). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive settings. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0153-5
Gupta, S. S., & Henninger, W. R., IV. (2014). How do children benefit from inclusion? In M. E. Vinh (Ed.), First steps to preschool inclusion: How to jumpstart your program-wide plan (pp. 33–57). Paul H. Brookes Publishing. http://archive.brookespublishing.com/documents/gupta-how-children-benefit-from-inclusion.pdf
Hiles, E. (2018). Parents’ reasons for sending their child to Montessori schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v4i1.6714
Hughes, C., & Agran, M. (1993). Teaching persons with severe disabilities to use self-instruction in community settings: An analysis of applications. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18(4), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699301800409
Ibrahim, I. R. A. (2018). Effectiveness of self-instruction strategy in improving word recognition skills for students with learning disabilities. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 8(2 Ver. II), 62–67. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-8%20Issue-2/Version-2/H0802026267.pdf
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004)
Jadan-Guerrero, J., Jaen, J., Carpio, M. A., & Guerrero, L. A. (2015). Kiteracy: A kit of tangible objects to strengthen literacy skills in children with Down syndrome. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771905
Jamieson, N. Y. (2005). The contribution of the Montessori approach to multisensory approaches to early learning disabilities [Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa]. https://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10539/1468/N%20Y%20Jamieson%209805090W.%20MEd%20Dissertation.pdf
Jones, B. A., & Peterson-Ahmad, M. B. (2017). Preparing new special education teachers to facilitate collaboration in the individualized education program process through mini conferencing (EJ1184062). ERIC. International Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 697–707. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184062.pdf.
Kayılı, G. (2018). The effect of Montessori method on cognitive tempo of Kindergarten children. Early Child Development and Care, 188, 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1217849
Kirk, H. E., Gray, K., Riby, D. M., & Cornish, K. M. (2015). Cognitive training as a resolution for early executive function difficulties in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.026
Kolbe, T. (2019). Funding special education: Charting a path that confronts complexity and crafts coherence. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/special-ed.
Kosiewicz, M. M., Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J., & Graves, A. W. (1982). Effects of self-instruction and self-correction procedures on handwriting performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510619
Law, J., Dennis, J. A., & Charlton, J. J. (2017). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and/or language disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012490
Leigh-Doyle, P., Maughan, J., & Joyce, M. (2008). Whole-school approaches to Montessori special education. North American Montessori Teachers Association Journal, 33(2), 147.
Lillard, A. S. (2012). Preschool children’s development in classic Montessori, supplemented Montessori, and conventional programs. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.001
Lillard, A. S., Heise, M. J., Richey, E. M., Tong, X., Hart, A., & Bray, P. M. (2017). Montessori preschool elevates and equalizes child outcomes: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01783
Long, T. M. (2019). Moving beyond inclusion to participation: Essential elements. Education Sciences & Society – Open Access, 10(1). https://journals.francoangeli.it/index.php/ess/article/view/7604
Marshall, C. (2017). Montessori education: A review of the evidence base. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7
McKenzie, G. K., & Zascavage, V. S. (2012). Montessori instruction: A model for inclusion in early childhood classrooms and beyond. Montessori Life, 24(1), 32–38.
McKenzie, G. K., Zascavage, V. S., & Murray, A. K. (2011). How Montessori methods in mathematics education meet the needs of students with learning challenges [White paper]. American Montessori Society. https://amshq.org/-/media/Files/AMSHQ/Research/Position-Papers/How-Montessori-Methods-in-Mathematics-Education-Meet-the-Needs-of-Students-with-Learning-Challenges.ashx
McLeskey, J., Barringer, M.-D., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., Jackson, D., Kennedy, M., Lewis, T., Maheady, L., Rodriguez, J., Scheeler, M. C., Winn, J., & Ziegler, D. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center. https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CEC-HLP-Web.pdf
McWilliam, R. (2016). Birth to three: Early intervention. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education (1st ed., pp. 75–88). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28492-7_5
Montessori Institute of San Diego. (n.d.). Inclusive education. Montessori Institute of San Diego. https://misdami.org/montessori-teacher-training-california/ami-montessori-courses/montessori-teacher-training-inclusive-education-certification-program/
Murawski, W. W., & Scott, K. L. (2019). What really works with universal design for learning. SAGE Publications.
Nehring, C. (2014). Implementing inclusion theory into practice (EJ1183199). NAMTA Journal, 39(3), 39–63. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183199.pdf
O’Connor, E. A., Yasik, A. E., & Horner, S. L. (2016). Teachers’ knowledge of special education laws: What do they know? (EJ1103671). ERIC. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 7–18. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103671.pdf
Phillips-Silver, J., & Daza, M. T. (2018). Cognitive control at age 3: Evaluating executive functions in an equitable Montessori preschool. Frontiers in Education, 3, 106. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00106
Pickering, J. S. (2008). Montessorians helping children who learn differently. NAMTA Journal, 33(2), 76–99.
Purpura, G., Cioni, G., & Tinelli, F. (2017). Multisensory-based rehabilitation approach: Translational insights from animal models to early intervention. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00430
Sigafoos, J., Arthur-Kelly, M., & Butterfield, N. (2006). Enhancing everyday communication for children with disabilities. Paul H. Brookes.
Spittle, A. J., & Morgan, C. (2018). Early intervention for children with cerebral palsy. In C. P. Panteliadis (Ed.), Cerebral palsy: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 193–200). Springer International Publishing.
Springle, A. P. (2020). Comparison of motor-enhanced and visual-enhanced interventions for grammar in young children with developmental language disorder (Publication No. 2422063754) [Doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, Ş., & Savage, M. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team. https://ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/sites/ncaep.fpg.unc.edu/files/imce/documents/EBP%20Report%202020.pdf
Strogilos, V. (2018). The value of differentiated instruction in the inclusion of students with special needs/disabilities in mainstream schools. SHS Web of Conferences, 42(00003). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200003
U.S. Department of Education. (2022). 43rd annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2021. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/43rd-arc-for-idea.pdf
Watkins, L., O’Reilly, M., Kuhn, M., Gevarter, C., Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., & Lang, R. (2015). A review of peer-mediated social interaction interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2264-x
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2000). Promoting the acquisition and development of self-determination in young children with disabilities. Early Education and Development, 11(4), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1104_6
Will, E., Fidler, D. J., Daunhauer, L., & Gerlach-McDonald, B. (2016). Executive function and academic achievement in primary-grade students with Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 61(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12313
Yu, S., & Park, H. (2020). Early childhood preservice teachers’ attitude development toward the inclusion of children with disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(4), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01017-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Toby Long, Clare Westerman, Nadia Ferrante
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
Author Agreement
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK
