Montessori’s Perspective on Citizenship Education
A View From the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v9i2.19418Keywords:
Montessori, citizenship education, peace education, moral development, sense of responsibilityAbstract
The purpose of this study is to synthesize Montessori’s writings on citizenship education to support the implementation of a Montessorian view. This synthesis demonstrates that Montessori was of the explicit conviction that a better world can be achieved through citizenship education, as it strives for a peaceful and harmonious society. We approach this topic through the Dutch context. Although schools in the Netherlands are required by law to promote active citizenship and social cohesion, this law does not stipulate which of the many different views on citizenship education schools must adhere to. Schools have the liberty to devise their own citizenship curricula if they can substantiate their views and choices. For Montessori schools, this requires insight into Montessori’s view on citizenship education. Although Montessori’s views are still largely appropriate in our time, an ongoing dialogue about citizenship education is required, as Montessori lived and worked in a specific geopolitical context. Based on our analysis, we have identified seven themes that characterize Montessori’s view on citizenship education: one common citizenship goal; preparation for independent thinking and action; image of the future citizen; adapted and critical citizens; humanity for harmony; knowledge as prerequisite, personality development as goal; and an ever-expanding worldview. The results of this study provide valuable insights for designing and teaching citizenship education through a Montessorian lens.
References
Biesta, G. (2021). Burgerschapsvorming: Pedagogische en levensbeschouwelijke eigenheid op het democratisch speelveld [Citizenship education: Educational and philosophical uniqueness on the democratic playing field]. Verus, vereniging voor katholiek en christelijk onderwijs. https://www.verus.nl/aanbod/produc-ten/whitepaper-gert-biesta-pedagogische-en-levens-beschouwelijke-eigenheid-op-het
Biesta, G., Lawy, R., & Kelly, N. (2009). Understanding young people’s citizenship learning in everyday life: The role of contexts, relationships and dispositions. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 4(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197908099374
Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
De Brouwer, J., Klaver, L., & van der Zee, S. (2022). Montessori en burgerschapsonderwijs: Balanceren tussen toerusten en ruimte geven [Montessori and citizenship education: Balancing between equipping and providing freedom]. Saxion Hogeschool. https://doi.org/10.14261/Montessori-en-burgerschap-de-brouwer-klaver-van-der-zee-2022.pdf
De Brouwer, J., Leenders, H. H. M., & Sins, P. H. M. (2023). Montessori in the Netherlands. In A. Murray, E.-M.T. Ahlquist, M. McKenna, & M. Debs (Eds.), Handbook of Montessori education. Bloomsbury Publications.
De Groot, I., Daas, R., & Nieuwelink, H. (2022). Education for democratic citizenship in Dutch schools: A bumpy road. Journal of Social Science Education, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-5381
De Groot, I., & Veugelers, W. (2015). Why we need to question the democratic engagement of adolescents in Europe. Journal of Social Science Education, 14(4), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v14-i4-1426
De Jong, W. (2021). Sociologen in zakformaat? Burgerschapsvorming en het schoolvak maatschappijleer in Nederland (1945-2020) [Pocket-sized sociologists? Citizenship education and the subject social studies in the Netherlands]. Pedagogische Studiën, 98, 204–220.
De Stefano, C. (2020). Maria Montessori: Het kind is de meester [The child is the teacher]. Xander Uitgevers B.V.
Dijkstra, A. B., Dam, G., & Munniksma, A. (2021). Inequality in citizenship competences: Citizenship education and policy in the Netherlands. In B. Malak-Minkiewicz & J. Torney-Purta (Eds.), Influences of the IEA Civic and Citizenship Education Studies: Practice, policy and research across countries and regions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3030-71102-3
Doppen, F. H. (2010). Citizenship education and the Dutch national identity debate. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 5(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197910370723
Eidhof, B. B. F. (2018). Influencing youth citizenship [Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam]. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=371e3f5e-0870-4cf6ac3e-677d8ae39a9d
Eidhof, B. B. F. (2020). Handboek burgerschapsonderwijs: Voor het voortgezet onderwijs [Handbook of citizenship education: For secondary education]. ProDemos. https://www.bureaucommonground.nl/s/Eidhof-2019-Handboek-Burgerschapsonderwijs.pdf
Eidhof, B. B. F., Ten Dam, G. T. M., Dijkstra, A. B., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2016). Consensus and contested citizenship education goals in Western Europe. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 11(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197915626084
Geboers, E., Geijsel, F., Admiraal, W., & Ten Dam, G. (2015). Citizenship orientations and knowledge in primary and secondary education. Social Psychology of Education, 18(4), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9265-7
Guérin, L. J. F. (2018). Group problem solving as citizenship education: Mainstream idea of participation revisited [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. Saxion Progressive Education University Press. https://www.academia.edu/36759967/
Guérin, L. J. F., Van der Ploeg, P. A., & Sins, P. H. M. (2013). Citizenship education: The feasibility of a participative approach. Educational Research, 55(4), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013 .844945
Gynther, P., & Ahlquist, E.-M. T. (2022). Education for sustainability and global citizenship for 6-12-yearolds in Montessori education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 16(1–2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/09734082221118336
Hacker, B. L. (2015). Promoting world citizenship: A crucial area of study. NAMTA Journal, 40(2), 139–148
Han, B. C. (2022). De palliatieve samenleving. [The palliative society]. Ten Have.
Heater, D. (2002). The history of citizenship education: A comparative outline. Parliamentary Affairs, 55(3), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/parlij/55.3.457
Hodson, D. (2020). Going beyond STS education: Building a curriculum for sociopolitical activism. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 592–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00114-6
Inspectorate of Education. (2022). Onderzoekskader 2021 voor het toezicht op de voorschoolse educatie en het primair onderwijs [Research framework 2021 for supervision of pre-school and primary education]. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/onderwerpen/onderzoekskaders/documenten/publicaties/2021/07/01/onderzoekskader-2021-primair-onderwijs
Jeliazkova, M. I. (2015). Citizenship education: Social science teachers’ views in three European countries [Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente]. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036540056
Joris, M. (2022). Citizenship: A matter of schooling? An educational inquiry into the normativity of citizenship education [Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368918253_Citizenship_a_matter_of_schooling_An_educational_inquiry_into_the_normativity_of_citizenship_education
Kramer, R. (1976). Maria Montessori, a biography. G. P. Putnam and Sons. Leenders, H., & Veugelers, W. (2009). Different perspectives on values and citizenship education. In Global Values Education (pp. 21–34). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2510-4_2
Leenders, H. H. M. (1999). Montessori en fascistisch Italië: Een receptiegeschiedenis. [Montessori and fascist Italy: A reception history]. Intro.
Leonard, G. (2015). The Montessori classroom: A foundation for global citizenship. NAMTA Journal, 40(2), 91–110. Montessori, M. (1946). Education for a new world. Kalaakshetra.
Montessori, M. (1952). Door het kind naar een nieuwe wereld [Through the child into a new world]. Kinheim-uitgeverij. (Original work published in 1941)
Montessori, M. (1954). Het onbegrepen kind [The formation of man]. Van Holkema & Warendorf N.V. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (1973). From childhood to adolescence. Schocken Books.
Montessori, M. (1992). Education and peace. Clio-Press. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (1998). Onderwijs en het menselijk potentieel [To educate the human potential]. Projectgroep Montessori APS. (Original work published 1947)
Montessori. M. (2016). The child, society and the world. Montessori-Pierson Publishing Company. (Original work published 1979)
Montessori, M. (2019a). Citizen of the world. Montessori-Pierson Publishing Company.
Montessori, M. (2019b). Het brein van het jonge kind [The absorbent mind]. Montessori-Pierson Publishing Company. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (2022). Zelfopvoeding [deel 1] [The advanced Montessori method]. Montessori-Pierson Publishing Company. (Original work published 1917)
Moretti, E. (2021). The best weapon for peace: Maria Montessori, education, and children’s rights. University of Wisconsin Press.
Parra, S. L., Bakker, C., & Van Liere, L. (2021). Practicing democracy in the playground: Turning political conflict into educational friction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/002 20272.2020.1838615
Quarfood, C. (2023). Maria Montessori: Life and historical context. In A. Murray, E.-M. T Ahlquist, M. McKenna, & M. Debs (Eds.), Handbook of Montessori education. Bloomsbury Publications.
Raimondo, R. (2023). Cosmic Education: The Vital Center of the Montessori Perspective. In A. Murray, 41Montessori and Citizenship Education E.-M. T. Ahlquist, M. McKenna, & M. Debs (Eds.), Handbook of Montessori education. Bloomsbury Publications.
Ramirez, F. O., & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education, 60(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112615
Rietveld-van Wingerden, M., Sturm, J. C., & Miedema, S. (2003). Vrijheid van onderwijs en sociale cohesie in historisch perspectief [Freedom of education and social cohesion in historical perspective]. Pedagogiek, 23(2), 97–108. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/187625
Sant, E. (2019). Democratic education: A theoretical review (2006–2017). Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 655–696. https://doi. org/10.3102/0034654319862493 Van der Ploeg, P. (2020). Burgerschapsvorming in tijden van communitair neoliberalisme [Citizenship education in times of communal neoliberalism]. NRO-werkplaats Democratisering van Kritisch Denken. https://werkplaatsburgerschap.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/BV-beleidsanalyse-2020.pdf
Van der Ploeg, P., & Guérin, L. (2016). Questioning participation and solidarity as goals of citizenship education. Critical Review, 28(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1191191
Van der Ploeg, P. A. (2019). Dewey and citizenship education: Schooling as democratic practice. In A. Peterson, G. Stahl, & H. Soong (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of citizenship and education (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-67905-1_20-1
Van Waveren, J. (2020). Burgerschapsonderwijs en de leerkracht binnen het speelveld van pedagogiek en politiek [Citizenship education and the teacher in the playing field of education and politics, Doctoral dissertation, University of Humanistic Studies].
Veugelers, W. (2011). The moral and the political in global citizenship: Appreciating differences in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011 .605329
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jaap de Brouwer, Lida Klaver , Symen van der Zee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
Author Agreement
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK
