Beliefs about Autonomy Support and Control in the Classroom
An Examination of Montessori and Traditional U.S. Public School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v10i2.20260Keywords:
Montessori teachers, self-determination theory, autonomy support, controlling teaching, traditional teachersAbstract
Montessori education is characterized by autonomous learning, whereas traditional education is often depicted by high structure and fewer choice opportunities. This study examined differences in beliefs of Montessori and traditional teachers in regard to effectiveness, normality, and ease of autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching, as well as differences in motivating styles. We analyzed the U.S. subset from an international study examining self-described motivation styles and beliefs. Our secondary analysis revealed both groups felt autonomy-supportive teaching was easy and effective, and that they found controlling teaching also to be easy, but ineffective. Montessori teachers were more likely to believe autonomy-supportive teaching was normal, whereas traditional teachers believed controlling teaching was more normal. Both groups described their teaching style as autonomy-supportive, but traditional teachers more often rated controlling scenarios as similar to their own practices. These differences, supported by large effect sizes, demonstrate more potential for controlling behavior in traditional classrooms and suggest the possibility of a cultural difference between Montessori and traditional teachers.
References
American Montessori Society. (2022, n.d.). What is Montessori education? https://amshq.org/About-Montessori/What-Is-Montessori
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.84.3.261
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(11), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125
Basargekar, A., & Lillard, A. S. (2023). Motivation and self-determination in Montessori education. In A. K. Murray, E. Tebano Ahlquist, M. K. McKenna, & M. Debs (Eds.), The Bloomsbury handbook of Montessori education (pp. 261–270). Bloomsbury.
Basten, M., Meyer‐Ahrens, I., Fries, S., & Wilde, M. (2014). The effects of autonomy‐supportive vs. controlling guidance on learners’ motivational and cognitive achievement in a structured field trip. Science Education, 98(6), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21125
Beatty, B. (2011). The dilemma of scripted instruction: Comparing teacher autonomy, fidelity and resistance in the Froebelian kindergarten, Montessori, direct instruction, and success for all. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300305
Byun, W., Blair, S. N., & Pate, R. R. (2013). Objectively measured sedentary behavior in preschool children: Comparison between Montessori and traditional preschools. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-2
Casquejo Johnston, L. M. (2016). Examining a Montessori adolescent program through a self-determination theory lens: A study of the lived experiences of adolescents. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v2i1.4994
Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004
Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H. R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0231
Christensen, O. (2019). Montessori identity in dialogue: A selected review of literature on teacher identity. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i2.8183
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Cossentino, J. (2005). Ritualizing expertise: A non-Montessorian view of the Montessori method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1086/426838
Cossentino, J. (2009). Culture, craft, & coherence: The unexpected vitality of Montessori teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109344593
Danner, N., & Fowler, S. (2015). Montessori and non-Montessori early childhood teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and access. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4944
Deci, E. L., Spiegel, N. H., Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Kauffman, M. (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: Behavior of controlling teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(6), 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.852
Dhiksha, J., & Suresh, A. (2016). Self-esteem and academic anxiety of high school students with Montessori and traditional method of education. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 7(5), 543–545.
Fisher, D. (2009). The use of instructional time in the typical high school classroom. The Educational Forum, 73(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720902739650
Flynn, T. M. (1991). Development of social, personal and cognitive skills of preschool children in Montessori and traditional preschool programs. Early Child Development and Care, 72(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443910720111
Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
Hein, V., Koka, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2015). Relationships between perceived teachers’ controlling behaviour, psychological need thwarting, anger and bullying behaviour in high-school students. Journal of Adolescence, 42, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.04.003
Herzog, M. H., Francis, G., & Clarke, A. (2019). Understanding statistics and experimental design: How to not lie with statistics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03499-3
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Katz, I., & Shahar, B. H. (2015). What makes a motivating teacher? Teachers’ motivation and beliefs as predictors of their autonomy-supportive style. School Psychology International, 36(6), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315609969
Krugerud, T. (2015). Benefits of choice in a Montessori classroom on student behavior and focus. [Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin–River Falls]. Minds@UW. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/74967
Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893–1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362
Lillard, A. S. (2019). Shunned and admired: Montessori, self-determination, and a case for radical school reform. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 939–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-3
Lopata, C., Wallace, N. V., & Finn, K. V. (2005). Comparison of academic achievement between Montessori and traditional education programs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540509594546
Mallett, J. D., & Schroeder, J. L. (2015). Academic achievement outcomes: A comparison of Montessori and non-Montessori public elementary school students. Journal of Elementary Education, 25(1), 39–53. https://www.public-montessori.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Mallett-Schroeder-2015-Comparison-of-Montessori-and-non-Montessori-public-elementary-school-students.pdf
Manner, J. C. (2007). Montessori vs. traditional education in the public sector: Seeking appropriate comparisons of academic achievement (EJ1099115). ERIC; Forum on Public Policy Online, 2007(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099115
Nguyen, H. (2018). Teacher preparation programs in the United States. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(3), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2018.146.6
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2007). Opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. Science, 315(5820), 1795–1796. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139719
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). The social context of middle school: Teachers, friends, and activities in Montessori and traditional school environments. The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/496907
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In W. Liu, J. Wang, & R. Ryan, (Eds.), Building autonomous learners (pp. 129–152).Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-0_7
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:moem.0000032312.95499.6f
Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., Kaplan, H., Moss, J. D., Olaussen, B. S., & Wang, C. K. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self–determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Moss, J. D., & Smuda, A. (2022, April 21–26). Reach and relationship: A review of the joint literature of Montessori and self-determination theory. Paper presentation at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. San Diego, California, United States.
Soenens, B., Park, S. Y., Vansteenkiste, M., & Mouratidis, A. (2012). Perceived parental psychological control and adolescent depressive experiences: A cross-cultural study with Belgian and South-Korean adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.05.001
Wells, K. B. (2014). Autonomy-supporting teaching practices in public Montessori schools (Publication No. 1571891) [Master’s thesis, Saint Mary’s College of Education]. Saint Mary’s College of California ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jennifer Moss, Theodore Wheeler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
