Students of Color and Public Montessori Schools: A Review of the Literature
Keywords:minority, students of color, Montessori, urban education, school choice
Students of color comprise a majority in public Montessori school enrollments around the United States, and practitioners are often asked for evidence of the Montessori Method’s benefits for these students. This article examines the relevant literature related to the experiences of students of color in public Montessori schools. Research finds Montessori education offers both opportunities and limitations for students of color in attending diverse schools, developing executive functions, achieving academically, accessing early childhood education and culturally responsive education, minimizing racially disproportionate discipline, and limiting overidentification for special education. Public Montessori education’s efficacy with students of color may be limited by several factors: the lack of diversity of the teaching staff and culturally responsive teacher education, schools that struggle to maintain racially diverse enrollments, and the challenge of communicating Montessori’s benefits to families with alternative views of education. The review concludes with directions for future research.
Alston, L. (2008). Why we teach: Learning, laughter, love, and the power to transform lives. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Ansari, A., & Winsler, A. (2014). Montessori public school pre-K programs and the school readiness of low-income Black and Latino children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 1066–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036799
Anyon, J. (2014). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Au, W. (2009). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ayer, D. (2016a, May 16). Native Montessori project revived. Montessori Public. Retrieved from http://www.montessoripublic.org/2016/05/native-montessori-project
Ayer, D. (2016b, October 12). Public, private, or something in between? A new model for Montessori schools. Montessori Public. Retrieved from http://www.montessoripublic.org/2016/10/3414/
Banks, K., & Maixner, R. A. (2016). Social justice education in an urban charter Montessori school. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v2i2.5066
Benson, J., & Borman, G. (2010). Family, neighborhood, and school settings across seasons: When do socioeconomic context and racial composition matter for the reading achievement growth of young children? Teachers College Record,112, 1338–1390.
Berends, M., & Penaloza, R. V. (2010). Increasing racial isolation and test score gaps in mathematics: A 30-year perspective. Teachers College Record, 112, 978–1007.
Bowie, L. (2016, February 22). City school board to decide if charter should welcome students who live nearby. Baltimore Sun. Retrieved from http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-montessori-vote-20160222-story.html
Braddock, J. H., II, & Gonzalez, A. D. C. (2010). Social isolation and social cohesion: The effects of K-12 neighborhood and school segregation on intergroup orientations. Teachers College Record, 112, 1631–1653.
Brown, K. (2016a, April). Racial diversity in Montessori charter schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association [AERA], Washington, DC. Available from AERA: http://www.aera.net/Publications/Online-Paper-Repository/AERA-Online-Paper-Repository/Owner/952029
Brown, K. (2016b, March). Reading and math achievement for third grade African American students in public Montessori schools. Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Montessori Society [AMS], Chicago, IL. Available from AMS:
Brown, K. E., & Steele, A. S. (2015). Racial discipline disproportionality in Montessori and traditional public schools: A comparative study using the relative rate index. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4941
Carter, S. C. (2000). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high-performing, high-poverty schools. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
Connor, D. J., & Ferri, B. A. (2007). The conflict within: Resistance to inclusion and other paradoxes in special education. Disability & Society, 22(1), 63–77. doi:10.1080/09687590601056717
Cossentino, J. (2010). Following all the children: Early intervention and Montessori. Montessori Life, 22(4), 38–45.
Danner, N. (2015). Early childhood inclusion in a public Montessori school: Access, participation, and supports (Doctoral dissertation). Available from AMS: https://amshq.org/Publications-and-Research/Research-Library/Dissertations-and-Theses
Danner, N., & Fowler, S. (2015). Montessori and non-Montessori early childhood teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and access. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4944
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
DC Montessori Residency. (n.d.). Surround: 15 job-embedded modules packaged into three courses. Retrieved from https://www.dc-montessori-residency.org/ - surround
Debs, M. (2016a, April). Minority parents, Montessori schools: Perceiving cultural fit in theme-based public schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC. Available from AERA: http://www.aera.net/Publications/Online-Paper-Repository/AERA-Online-Paper- Repository/Owner/961581
Debs, M. (2016b). Racial and economic diversity in U.S. public Montessori schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v2i2.5848
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4–12 years old. Science, 333, 959–964.
Dohrmann, K. R., Nishida, T. K., Gartner, A., Lipsky, D. K., & Grimm, K. J. (2007). High school outcomes for students in a public Montessori program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 205–217. doi:10.1080/02568540709594622
Duax, T. (1989). Preliminary report on the educational effectiveness of a Montessori school in the public sector. The NAMTA Journal, 14(2), 55–62.
East Dallas Community Schools. (2010). Summer newsletter 2010 [Newsletter]. Retrieved from the National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector:
EGUSD staff wants diversity in local charter schools. (2016, March 8). Elk Grove Citizen. Retrieved from http://www.egcitizen.com/articles/2016/03/08/news/doc56df70b6df8db588124584.txt
Ervin, B., Wash, P. D., & Mecca, M. E. (2010). A 3-year study of self-regulation in Montessori and non-Montessori classrooms. Montessori Life, 22(2), 22–31.
Fabel, L. (2016, October 16). How a Montessori movement is reinventing public schools. One Day Magazine. Retrieved from Teach for America:
Fort Peck combines language immersion with Montessori methods. (1998). Tribal College Journal, 9(4), 15.
Furman University, Riley Institute. (2015). South Carolina public Montessori study: Montessori student demographics. Retrieved from
García, S. B., & Ortiz, A. A. (2006). Preventing disproportionate representation: Culturally and linguistically responsive prereferral interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 64–68.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gershenson, S., Holt, S. B., & Papageorge, N. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student-teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.03.002
Golann, J. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88, 103–119. doi:10.1177/0038040714567866
Goldsmith, P. R. (2010). Learning apart, living apart: How the racial and ethnic segregation of schools and colleges perpetuates residential segregation. Teachers College Record, 112, 1602–1630.
Goodman, J. F. (2013). Charter management organizations and the regulated environment: Is it worth the price? Educational Researcher, 42, 89–96. doi:10.3102/0013189X12470856
Green, T. D. (2005). Promising prevention and early intervention strategies to reduce overrepresentation of African American students in special education. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 33–41.
Hall, H. R. (2006). Mentoring young men of color: Meeting the needs of African American and Latino students. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Hall, H. R., & Murray, A. K. (2011). Intersections between Montessori practices and culturally-based curriculum for African-American students [White paper]. Retrieved from AMS:
Head Start turns 50. (2015, September 28). The Durango Herald. Retrieved from
Heckman, J. J. (2012). Invest in early childhood development: Reduce deficits, strengthen the economy. Retrieved from The Heckman Equation: http://heckmanequation.org/content/resource/invest-early-childhood-development-reduce-deficits-strengthen-economy
Hixon, S. (2002). Blending Head Start and Montessori: The best of both worlds. Montessori Life, 14(4), 37–38.
Irvine, J. J. (1991). Black students and school failure: Policies, practices, and prescriptions. New York, NY: Praeger.
Johnson, J. K. (2005, March 9). Preschool utilizes cultural relevancy. Indian Country News. Retrieved from http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2005/03/09/preschool-utilizes-cultural-relevancy-94582
Johnston, L. J. (2016, October 12). Education self-determination superstars: Cochiti Pueblo takes on language-learning. Indian Country Media Network. Retrieved from
Kunjufu, J. (2005). Keeping Black boys out of special education. Chicago, IL: African American Images.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2013). Lack of achievement or loss of opportunity? In P. L. Carter & K. G. Weiner (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 11–23). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F., IV (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47–68.
Lewis, A. E. (2001). There is no “race” in the schoolyard: Color-blind ideology in an (almost) all-white school. American Education Research Journal, 38, 781–811.
Lewis, C. W., Chambers, T. V., & Butler, B. R. (2012). Urban education in the 21st century: An overview of selected issues that impact African American student outcomes. In J. L. Moore III & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), African American students in urban schools: Critical issues and solutions for achievement (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lillard, A. S. (2012). Preschool children’s development in classic Montessori, supplemented Montessori, and conventional programs. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 379–401.
Lillard, A. S. (2013). Playful learning and Montessori education. American Journal of Play, 5, 157–186.
Lillard, A. S., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1–34. doi:10.1037/a0029321
Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313, 1893–1894. doi:10.1126/science.1132362
Lopata, C., Wallace, N. V., & Finn, K. V. (2005). Comparison of academic achievement between Montessori and traditional education programs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20, 5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02568540509594546
Makris, M., & Brown, E. (in press). A different type of charter school: In prestige charters, a rise in cachet equals a decline in access. Journal of Education Policy.
Mallett, J. D. (2014). Longitudinal academic achievement outcomes: Modeling the growth trajectories of Montessori elementary public school students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from UMI. (2620830)
Mallett, J. D., & Schroeder, J. L. (2015). Academic achievement outcomes: A comparison of Montessori and non-Montessori public elementary school students. Journal of Elementary Education, 25(1), 39–53. Available from the University of the Punjab: http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/JEE/PDF-Files/3_v25_no1_15.pdf
McCord, S. (2012, September 19). Santa Cruz City Schools takes public Montessori plan off the table. Santa Cruz Sentinel. Retrieved from
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J. … Zayas, V. (2011). “Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq081
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938. doi:10.1126/science.2658056
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1476399
Montessori Accreditation Council for Teacher Education. (2016). Guide to accreditation: April 2016 revision. Retrieved from http://www.macte.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/2016-MACTE-Guide-to-Accreditation.pdf
Montessori, M. (1976). Education for human development: Understanding Montessori. New York, NY: Schocken.
Moody, M. J., & Riga, G. (2011). Montessori: Education for life. In L. Howell, C. W. Lewis, & N. Carter (Eds.), Yes we can! Improving urban schools through innovative education reform (pp. 127–143). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Murray, A., & Peyton, V. (2008). Public Montessori schools: A delicate balance. Montessori Life, 20(4), 26–30.
National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2014). Growth of public Montessori in the United States: 1975-2014 Retrieved from http://www.public-montessori.org/white-papers/growth-of-public-montessori-in-the-united-states-1975-2014/
National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2016a). NCMPS rubric of essential elements of Montessori practice in the public sector. Retrieved from http://www.public-montessori.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/NCMPS-Essential-Elements-4.0.pdf
National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2016b). 2016 Teach Montessori current trainee survey: Summary report. Washington, DC: Author.
Newton, X. A. (2010). End-of-high-school mathematics attainment: How did students get there? Teachers College Record, 112, 1064–1095.
Noguera, P. A. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory Into Practice, 42, 341–350. Retrieved from
Nyland, L. (2015). Amendment to the new student assignment plan regarding Leschi Elementary blended model for the 2015–16 school year. School Board Briefing/Proposed Action Report. Seattle, WA: Seattle Public Schools.
Orfield, G., Kucsera, J., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2012). E Pluribus… separation: Deepening double segregation for more students. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. Retrieved from https://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus...separation-deepening-double-segregation-for-more-students
Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 85–100.
Paris, D., & Winn, M. T. (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Pollock, M. (2008). Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in school. New York, NY: The New Press.
Prothero, A. (2016, March 8). In charters, using weighted lotteries for diversity hits barriers. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/03/09/in-charters-using-weighted-lotteries-for-diversity.html
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). The social context of middle school: Teachers, friends, and activities in Montessori and traditional school environments. The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 59–79. doi:10.1086/496907
Roberts, J. C., & Fleming, D. J. (2016, January). Mapping the landscape of public Montessori in South Carolina. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Rodriguez, L., Irby, B. J., Brown, G., Lara-Alecio, R., & Galloway, M. M. (2005). An analysis of second grade reading achievement related to pre-kindergarten Montessori and transitional bilingual education. National Association of Bilingual Education. In V. Gonza?lez & J. Tinajero (Eds.), NABE Review of Research and Practice (Vol. 3, pp. 45–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schonleber, N. (2011). Hawaiian culture-based education and the Montessori approach: Overlapping teaching practices, values, and worldview. Journal of American Indian Education, 50(3), 5–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43608610
Shedd, C. (2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317–342. doi:10.1023/A:1021320817372
Stansbury, J. (2012). Dealing with diversity: Administrator, teacher and parent perceptions of the responsiveness of Montessori schools to racial and ethnic diversity (Unpublished master’s thesis). DePaul University, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from AMS https://amshq.org/Publications-and-Research/Research-Library/~/media/9E1F8E5CC6E2496E8FE8E183D3BE98BE.ashx
Stevenson, B. (2016, March 12). American injustice: Mercy, humanity, and making a difference. Dr. Nancy McCormick Rambusch Lecture at the annual meeting of the American Montessori Society, Chicago, IL.
Swedien, J. (2013, June 4). Montessori charter school supporters fight back. Leader-Telegram. Retrieved from http://www.leadertelegram.com/News/Front-Page/2013/06/04/Montessori-Charter-School-supporters-fight-back.html
Teach Montessori. (2017). Teach Montessori. Retrieved from http://www.teach-montessori.org/
Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (2004). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Thompson, N. L., Franz, D. P., & Miller, N. C. (2009). Looping: Research summary. Retrieved from https://www.amle.org/BrowsebyTopic/WhatsNew/WNDet/TabId/270/ArtMID/888/ArticleID/311/Looping.aspx
Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Trondson, E. (2016). Montessori education and social justice: Overlap, potential and areas for growth (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Wisconsin, Madison. Retrieved from
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2013). Table 209.10. Number and percentage distribution of teachers in public and private elementary and secondary schools, by selected teacher characteristics: Selected years, 1987–88 through 2011–12 [Table]. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_209.10.asp
U.S. Department of Education (2015). A matter of equity: Preschool in America. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/documents/early-learning/matter-equity-preschool-america.pdf
Van Acker, T. (2013). From boutique to big box: A case study concerning teacher change transitioning to a public Montessori school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3609604)
Wells, A. S., Holme, J. J., Revilla, A. T., & Atanda, A. K. (2009). Both sides now: The story of school desegregation’s graduates. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whitescarver, K., & Cossentino, J. (2008). Montessori and the mainstream: A century of reform on the margins. Teachers College Record, 110, 2571–2600.
Wohlstetter, P. (2016, April). Intentionally diverse charters: Inside schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Wong, Q. (2014, June 19). State approval of Montessori school in Salem stalls. Statesman Journal. Retrieved from http://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/education/2014/06/19/state-approval-montessori-school-salem-stalls/11004775/
Yezbick, M. (2007). How Montessori educators in the U.S. address culturally responsive teaching (Unpublished master’s thesis). San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA. Available from AMS: https://amshq.org/Publications-and-Research/Research-Library/Dissertations-and-Theses
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK