The Effects of Choice on Reading Engagement and Comprehension for Second- and Third-Grade Students: An Action Research Report


  • Julie Fraumeni-Mcbride Chapman university



literacy, literacy acquisition, reading, reading comprehension, choice, silent reading, aloud reading, Montessori


Poor literacy rates contribute to low school performance for children across America. In particular, low-income schools continue to struggle with declining literacy rates. Issues with literacy are often attributed to lack of reading comprehension. This study tested the effects of choice on reading comprehension in second- and third-grade students at a high-income school and a low-income school. Students were observed while reading silently and aloud to see if either method affected reading comprehension. Data were collected from 32 students before, during, and after reading to determine whether students’ comprehension levels were higher when given opportunities to choose their own books or when they read assigned books. Trials were performed while students read silently and then aloud. Results indicated that students had higher comprehension levels both when they could choose their own books and when they read silently.

Author Biography

Julie Fraumeni-Mcbride, Chapman university

Current doctoral student at Chapman university in education and disability studies. Holds AMS early childhood cdryifixatr, a bachelor's in human development and masters in education.


Barnett, W. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 5(3), 25–50.

Burns, S. M., Griffin, P., & Snow, C. E. (Eds.). (1999). Starting out right: A guide to promoting children’s reading success. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Campbell, J. R., & Donahue, P. L. (1997). Students selecting stories: The effects of choice in reading assessment. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 97-491. Retrieved from

Chow, P.-H., & Chou, C.-T. (2000). Evaluating sustained silent reading in reading classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). Retrieved from

Dearing, E., Kreider, H., Simpkins, S., & Weiss, H. B. (2006). Family involvement in school and low-income children’s literacy: Longitudinal associations between and within families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 653–654.

Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642–650.

Entwisle, D. R., & Alexander, K. L. (1998). Facilitating the transition to first grade: The nature of transition and research on factors affecting it. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 351–364.

Epstein, A. S. (2007). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Gardiner, S. (2005). Building student literacy through sustained silent reading. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Hasbrouck, J. (2006). For students who are not yet fluent, silent reading is not the best use of classroom time. American Educator, 30(2). Retrieved from

Hawkins, R. O., Hale, A., Sheeley, W., & Ling, S. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary-previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high-school readers. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 59–77.

Hohmann, M. (2005). Growing Readers early literacy curriculum: Teacher guide. Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Educational Research Foundation Press.

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

Lewis, M., Alessandri, S. M., & Sullivan, M. W. (1990). Violation of expectancy, loss of control, and anger expressions in young infants. Developmental Psychology, 26, 745–751.

Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

McCallum, R. S., Sharp, S., Bell, S. M., & George, T. (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 241–246.

Murnane, R., Sawhill, I., & Snow, C. (2012). Literacy challenges for the twenty-first century: Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 22(2), 3–15.

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved from

NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428–442.

Olofsson, A., & Niedersøe, J. (1999). Early language development and kindergarten phonological awareness as predictors of reading problems: From 3 to 11 years of age. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(5), 464–472.

Pressley, M., Mohan, L., Raphael, L. M., & Fingeret, L. (2007). How does Bennett Woods Elementary School produce such high reading and writing achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 221–240. Retrieved from

Reibstein, D. J., Youngblood, S. A., & Fromkin, H. L. (1975). Number of choices and perceived decision freedom as a determinant of satisfaction and consumer behavior. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 434–437.

Sanden, S. (2014). Out of the shadows of SSR: Real teachers’ classroom independent reading practices. Language Arts, 91, 161–175.

Sénéchal, M., & Young, L. (2008). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 78, 880–907.

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences in individual differences in the

acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.

Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.

Strickland, D. S., & Riley-Ayers, S. (2006). Early literacy: Policy and practice in the preschool years. National Institute for Early Education Research, Policy Brief. Retrieved from

Takeuchi, O., Ikeda, M., & Mizumoto, A. (2012). Reading aloud activity in L2 and cerebral activation. RELC Journal: A Journal Of. Language Teaching Research, 43, 151–167.

Vitto, J. (2003). Relationship-driven classroom management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.

Wiesendanger, K. D., & Birlem, E. D. (1984). The effectiveness of SSR: An overview of the research. Reading Horizons, 24(3). Retrieved from




How to Cite

Fraumeni-Mcbride, J. (2017). The Effects of Choice on Reading Engagement and Comprehension for Second- and Third-Grade Students: An Action Research Report. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(2), 19–38.