Technology in the Montessori Classroom: Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Use

Sara Jolly Jones

Abstract


As technology becomes ubiquitous in society, there is increasing momentum to incorporate it into education. Montessori education is not immune to this push for technology integration. This qualitative study investigates four Upper Elementary Montessori teachers’ attitudes toward technology and technology integration in a public school setting. Interviews and observations were used to understand the teachers’ thoughts and actions regarding technology in the classroom. Both the school context and teacher background played important roles in teachers’ beliefs and actions. Teachers in this study expressed positive views of technology in general, exhibiting high technology efficacy and valuing the development of technology skills in their students. However, all four teachers struggled to include instructional technology in ways that are consistent with a Montessori paradigm. Although individual student use of adaptive tutoring software was the most common use of technology, the teachers varied greatly in both the amount of student time spent on computers and the roles that technology played in their classrooms.


Keywords


Montessori; technology; TPACK; Qualitative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/examining-tpack-among-k-12-online-distance-educators-in-the-united-states/

Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon report: 2015 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizon-report-k12-EN.pdf

Elkind, D. (2003). Montessori and constructivism. Montessori Life, 15(1), 26–29.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The ?nal frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. doi:10.1007/BF02504683

Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers in Education Journal, 51, 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.004

Faryardi, Q. (2007). The Montessori paradigm of learning: So what? Available from

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496081

Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00559.x

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for undertaking technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953–1960.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010

Gray, L., Thomas, N., Lewis, L., & Tice, P. (2009). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U. S. public schools: 2009 first look. (NCES 2010-040). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Educational Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf

Harris, J. B., Hofer, M. J., Schmidt, D. A., Blanchard, M. R., Young, C. Y., Grandgenett, N. F., & van Olphen, M. (2010). “Grounded” technology integration: Instructional planning using curriculum-based activity type taxonomies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18, 573–605. Available from http://www.editlib.org/p/30418

Hervey, L. G. (2011). Between the notion and the act: Veteran teachers’ TPACK and practice in 1:1 settings [Doctoral dissertation]. Available from ProQuest. (UMI No. 3463705).

Hubbell, E. R. (2006). Authenticity and technology in Montessori education. Montessori Life, 18(2), 16–20. Available from EBSCO Host http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/20982979/authenticity-technology-montessori-education

Hughes, J. E., Guion, J. M., Bruce, K. A., Horton, L. R., & Prescott, A. (2011). A framework for action: Intervening to increase adoption of transformative web 2.0 learning resources. Educational Technology, 51(2), 53–61.

ISTE. (2016). National educational technology standards for students (NETS-S). Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students-2016#startstandards

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6

Lillard, A. (2008). How important are the Montessori materials? Montessori Life, 20(4), 20–25.

Love, A. & Sikorski, P. (2000). Integrating technology in a Montessori classroom. Report No. ED441600. Retrieved from ERIC http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED441600.pdf

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Montessori, M. (1989). To educate the human potential. Oxford, England: Clio Press.

Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori Method. New York, NY: Frederick Stokes Co.

Monson, M. (2006). Reconstructing Montessori: On being an authentic Montessori school. Montessori Life, 18(2), 36–43.

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf

Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J, & Wong, Y. T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U.S. teachers. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 National Survey (Report #4). Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota. Retrieved from ERIC http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED445657.pdf

Read, M. F., Jones, S. J., Hughes, J. E., & Gonzales-Dholakia, G. (2011, April). An ecological case study of two middle schools’ technology integration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Shulman, S. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004

Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844

Ültanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5, 195–212. Retrieved from ERIC http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533786.pdf

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v3i1.6458

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Sara Jolly Jones

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This electronic publication is supported by the

University of Kansas Libraries.


ISSN:  2378-3923