Homework Policy and Student Choice: Findings from a Montessori Charter School
AbstractThe use of homework has been a controversial topic in education for many years: what types of homework to give, how much, and how often. In previous years, Ocean Montessori School (a pseudonym), the site of this study, offered homework like that of traditional public schools, such as worksheets and rote skill practice. Feeling conflicted about the misalignment between traditional homework and Montessori practices, the school administration changed the homework policy for the 2016–2017 academic year. The new policy encouraged students to choose what they wanted to do each night for homework. This study examines the views and practices of the teachers, students, and parents involved in the new homework policy. Data were collected from parent surveys, teacher focus groups, student interviews, observations, and student work samples. The findings indicate that, although students enjoyed the proposed homework change, it lacked sufficient structure for parents, and students needed support from teachers and parents to engage in meaningful homework tasks.
American Montessori Society. (2016). Introduction to Montessori Method. Retrieved from http://amshq.org/Montessori-Education/Introduction-to-Montessori
Ansari, A., & Winsler, A. (2014). Montessori public school pre-K programs and the school readiness of low-income black and Latino children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 1066–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036799
Association Montessori Internationale / USA. (n.d.) Montessori classrooms. Retrieved from http://amiusa.org/montessori-classrooms/
Bagby, J., & Sulak, T. (2014). Connecting homework effectiveness with Montessori practice. Montessori Life, 26(4), 44–46.
Bhatia, P., Davis, A., & Shamas-Brandt, E. (2015). Educational gymnastics: The effectiveness of Montessori practical life activities in developing fine motor skills in kindergartners. Early Education and Development, 26, 594–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.995454
Blicha, A., & Belfiore, P. J. (2013). The effects of automated prompting and self-monitoring on homework completion for a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(3), 33–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n3p51
Loveless, T. (2014). The 2014 Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning? (Brown Center on Education Policy, Vol. 3, No. 3). Retrieved from the Brookings Institute website: https://www.brookings.edu/research/2014-brown-center-report-on-american-education-how-well-are-american-students-learning/
Carver-Akers, K. (2013). Building intercultural competency in the language immersion Montessori classroom. Learning Languages, 18(2), 38–43. Retrieved from ERIC website:
Cooper, H. (2001). Homework for all: In moderation. Educational Leadership, 58(7), 34–38.
Cooper, H. (2006). The battle over homework: Common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 70–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.199
Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
Danner, N., & Fowler, S. (2015). Montessori and non-Montessori early childhood teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and access. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 28–41.
DeNisco, A. (2013, March). Homework or not? That is the (research) question. District Administration. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com/article/homework-or-not-research-question
Debs, M., & Brown, K. E. (2017). Students of color and public Montessori schools: A review of the literature. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(1), 1–15.
Donne, V., & Briley, M. L. (2015). Multimedia storybooks: Supporting vocabulary for students who are deaf/hard-of-hearing. International Journal of Special Education, 30(2), 94–106. Retrieved from ERIC website: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1094815.pdf
Dorer, M. (2007). The first Montessori century: Where do we go from here? [Letter from the editor]. Montessori Life, 19(1), 6–7. Retrieved from American Montessori Society website: http://amshq.org/Publications-and-Research/Montessori-Life/~/media/5B3433C12B5B490D8288007C6190543E.ashx
Galloway, M., Conner, J., & Pope, D. (2013). Nonacademic effects of homework in privileged, high-performing high schools. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 490–510.
Gecer A., & Dag, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Theory and Practice, 12(1), 438–442.
Gonida, E. N., & Cortina, K. S. (2014). Parental involvement in homework: Relations with parent and student achievement-related motivational beliefs and achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 376–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12039
Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Students’ perceptions and emotions towards learning in a flipped general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9630-8
Lillard, A. S. (2013). Playful learning and Montessori education. American Journal of Play, 5, 157–186. Retrieved from http://www.journalofplay.org/sites/www.journalofplay.org/files/pdf-articles/5-2-article-play-learning-and-montessori-education_0.pdf
Lillard, A. S. (2016). Montessori: The science behind the genius (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lillard, A. S., & Heise, M. J. (2016). An intervention study: Removing supplemented materials from Montessori classrooms associated with better child outcomes. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(1), 16–26.
Little, C. W., Hart, S. A., & Schatschneider, C. (2016). Examining associations among ADHD, homework behavior, and reading comprehension: A twin study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 410–423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219414555715
Maltese, A. V., Tai, R. H., & Fan, X. (2012). When is homework worth the time? Evaluating the association between homework and achievement in high school science and math. High School Journal, 96(1), 52–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2012.0015
Mautone, J. A., Marshall, S. A., & Costigan, T. E. (2012). Multidimensional assessment of homework: An analysis of students with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorder, 16, 600–609.
MetLife. (2007). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: The homework experience. Retrieved from https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/contributions/foundation/american-teacher/metlife-survey-american-teacher-2007-homework-experience.pdf
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Montessori Foundation. (2017). Is Montessori opposed to homework? Retrieved from
Ndebele, M. (2015). Socio-economic factors affecting parents’ involvement in homework: Practices and perceptions from eight Johannesburg public primary schools. Perspectives in Education, 33(3), 72–91.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
Noel, A., Stark, P., and Redford, J. (2016). Parent and family involvement in education, from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2012 (NCES 2013-028.REV2), National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics website:
Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9135-5
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896–915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019545
Pate, R. R., O’Neill, J. R., & Byun, W., McIver, K. L., Dowda, M., & Brown, W. H. (2014). Physical activity in preschool children: Comparison between Montessori and traditional preschools. Journal of School Health, 84, 716–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josh.12207
Peng, H.-H., & Md-Yunus, S. (2014). Do children in Montessori schools perform better in the achievement test? A Taiwanese perspective. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46, 299–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13158-014-0108-7
Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 194–218.
Schmidt, S. M., & Ralph, D. L. (2016). Flipped classroom: A twist on teaching. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/cier.v9i1.9544
Scott, C. M. (2017). Un-“chartered” waters: Balancing Montessori curriculum and accountability measures in a charter school. Journal of School Choice: International Research and Reform, 11, 168–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2016.1251280
Silinskas, G., Kiuru, N., & Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2015). The developmental dynamics of children’s academic performance and mothers’ homework-related affect and practices. Developmental Psychology, 51, 419–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038908
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. (Original work published 1980)
Steiner, M. (2016). Freeing up teachers to learn: A case study of teacher autonomy as a tool for reducing educational inequalities in a Montessori school. FORUM: For Promoting 3-19 Comprehensive Education, 58, 421–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.15730/forum.2016.58.3.421
Tobin, T., Boulmier, P., & Zhu, W., Hancock, P., & Muennig, P. (2015). Improving outcomes for refugee children: A case study on the impact of Montessori education along the Thai-Burma border. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 14(3), 138–149. Available from http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/IEJ/index
Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 26–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1084
Vatterot, C. (2010). Five hallmarks of good homework. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 10–15. Retrieved from ASCD website: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-
Wharton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_2
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H., eds. (2014). Educational psychology: A century of contributions. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2017 Catherine M Scott
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK