Montessori Identity in Dialogue
A Selected Review of Literature on Teacher Identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i2.8183Keywords:
teacher identity, Montessori, antibias/antiracist teaching, dialogic identityAbstract
Montessori teacher education includes an intensive and ongoing teacher transformation. This experience aids in the development of a clearly defined teacher identity. Research on teacher identity broadly has shown that while such an identity can offer guidance and support, it can also limit teachers and prevent them from exploring other strategies that may support them and, in turn, their students (e.g., Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009; Britzman, 2003; Sumsion, 2002). This effect is problematic when teachers face moments of uncertainty and dilemmas in their teaching practice. As Montessori classrooms become increasingly diverse, teachers may need to adopt identities that are not explicitly defined in Montessori teacher transformation. This review of literature examines components of a Montessori teacher identity and, broadly, the effects of teacher identity as well as elements of antibias and antiracist teacher-identity development that includes inner reflection and an activist approach to teaching.
References
Akkerman, S., & Meijer, P. (2011). A dialogic approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 308–319. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Anzaldúa, G. (2008). Borderlands, la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books. (Original work published 1987)
Ausdale, D., & Feagin, J. (2002). The first R: How children learn race and racism. Boston, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Barker, C. (2012). Cultural studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Barnes, E. (2015). Social identities and transformative experience. Res Philosophica, 92(2), 171–187. doi:10.11612/resphil.2015.92.2.3
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. doi:10.1080/03057640902902252
Branch, J. (2017). Uncovering meaning in Montessori teachers’ lived experiences of cosmic education as a tool for social justice (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/70/
Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Brown, K., & Steele, A. (2015). Racial discipline disproportionality in Montessori and traditional public schools: a comparative study using the relative rate index. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4941
Cardelle-Elawar, M., & Lizzarraga, M. (2010). Looking at teacher identity through self-regulation. Psicothema, 22(2), 293–298. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/PDF/3729.pdf
Chang-Kredl, S., & Kingsley, S. (2014). Identity expectations in early childhood teacher education. Pre-service teachers’ memories of prior experiences and reasons for entry into the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.05.005
Christensen, O. (2016). Proving Montessori: Identity and dilemmas in a Montessori teacher’s lived experience. Journal of Montessori Research, 2(2), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v2i2.5067
Christensen, O. (2019, Fall). Running in circles: Dilemmas, uncertainty, and the freedom to cope. Montessori Life, 30(4), 29–35.
Cuban, L. (1992). Managing dilemmas with building professional communities. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X021001004
Derman-Sparks, L. (2008). Why an anti-bias curriculum? In A. Pelo, (Ed), Rethinking early childhood education (pp. 7–12). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
Derman-Sparks, L., & Edwards, J. (2010). Anti-bias education for young children and ourselves. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Derman-Sparks, L., & Ramsey, P. (2006). What if all the kids are white? Anti-bias multicultural education with young children and families. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fecho, B., Graham, P., & Hudson-Ross, S. (2005). Appreciating the wobble: Teacher research, professional development, and figured worlds. English Education, 37(3), 174–199. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40173190
Flores, M., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
Friesen, M. D., & Besley, S. C. (2013). Teacher identity development in the first year of teacher education: A developmental and social psychological perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 23–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.005
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
Geijsel, F., & Meijers, F. (2005). Identity learning: The core process of educational change. Educational Studies, 31(4), 419–430. doi:10.1080/03055690500237488
Gilliam, W., Maupin, A., Reyes, C., Accavitti, M., & Schic, F. (2016). Do early educators’ implicit bias regarding sex and race relate to behavior expectations and recommendations of preschool expulsions and suspension? A research study brief. Yale University Child Study Center. Retrieved from https://medicine.yale.edu/childstudy/zigler/publications/Preschool%20Implicit%20Bias%20Policy%20Brief_final_9_26_276766_5379_v1.pdf
Goldstein, T. (2001). “I’m not white”: Anti-racist teacher education for white early childhood educators. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2001.2.1.6
Green, E. (2015). Building a better teacher. New York, NY: Norton.
Hamman, D., Gosselin, K., Romano, J., & Bunuan, R. (2010). Using possible-selves theory to understand the identity development of new teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1349–1361. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.005
Han, D. (2018). Speaking in my mother tongue: What it means to be a Montessori teacher of color. Montessori Life, 3(1), 28–33. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a8266baf14aa1dab6c210a6/t/5ab3283970a6ad9909b73486/1521690683449/Speaking+in+My+Mother+Tongue.pdf
Han, D., & Moquino, T. (2018, Spring). Moving beyond peace education to social justice education. AMI/USA Journal, 8–10. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a8266baf14aa1dab6c210a6/t/5b084dfc352f533114091730/1527270909223/Moving+Beyond+Peace+Education+to+Social+Justice+Education.pdf
Hawkins, K. (2014). Teaching for social justice, social responsibility and social inclusion: a respectful pedagogy for twenty-first century early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 22(5), 723–738. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2014.969085
Helsing, D. (2007). Regarding uncertainty in teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1317–1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.007
Hermans, H. (2001). The dialogic self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281. doi:10.1177/1354067X0173001
hooks, b. (2003). Teaching community. New York, NY: Routledge.
Husband, T. (2012). “I don’t see color”: Challenging assumptions about discussing race with young children. Early Childhood Education, 39, 365–371. doi:10.1007/s10643-011-0458-9
Jewell, T. (2018). Anti-bias education for students and educators alike [Webinar]. Available from American Montessori Society website: https://amshq.org/Educators/Professional-Development/Professional-Development-Online/Webinars/All-Webinars/AntiBias-Education-for-Students-and-Educators-Alike
Jones, S., & Vagle, M. D. (2013). Living contradictions and working for change toward a theory of social class sensitive pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 42(3), 129–141. doi:10.3102/0013189X13481381
Kemple, K., Harris, M., & Lee, R. (2015). Becoming color-conscious: Preparation to address young children’s curiosity about race. Discussions on Sensitive Issues, 19, 1–28. doi:10.1108/S0270-402120150000019002
Kissinger, K. (2017). Anti-bias education in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kumashiro, K. (2002). Troubling education. New York, NY: Routledge Farmer.
Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.55.2.56142234616x4352
Loeffler, M. (2000, Winter). The dynamic difference: Montessori’s legacy for the new century. Montessori Life, 12(1), 23–29.
Malm, B. (2004). Constructing professional identities: Montessori teachers’ voices and visions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(4), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383042000245799
McCaffrey, M. (2017). Practicing freedom: Effects of personal anti-racist engagement on a Montessori educator’s experience (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/246/
Miller, J. P. (1994). Contemplative practice in higher education an experiment in teacher development. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34(4), 53–69. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678940344005
Montessori, M. (1967). The absorbent mind. New York, NY: Dell Publishing Co.
Montessori, M. (1972a). Education and peace. Chennai, India: Kalashetra Press.
Montessori, M. (1972b). The discovery of the child. New York, NY: Ballantine Books. (Original work published 1967)
Montessori, M. (1991). Education for a new world. Thiruvanmiyur, India: Kalashetra Press. (Original work published 1946)
Montessori, M. (2005). The secret of childhood. Chennai, India: Orient Longman Private Limited. (Original work published 1936)
Montessori, M. (2016). Lecture 3: Some suggestions and remarks upon observing children. North American Montessori Teachers’ Association Journal, 41(3), 391–397. Retrieved from ERIC database: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1125384.pdf (Original work published in 1921)
Montessori School of Beaverton. (2011). AMI teacher training [Online video]. Available from https://montessori-ami.org/resource-library/videos/ami-teacher-training
Palmer, P. (2007). The courage to teach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1998)
Standing, E. M. (1957). Maria Montessori: Her life and work. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
Sumsion, J. (2002). Becoming, being and unbecoming an early childhood educator: A phenomenological case study of teacher attrition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 869–885. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00048-3
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Teaching Tolerance. (2014). Teaching Tolerance anti-bias framework. Retrieved from http://www.tolerance.org/sites/default/files/general/Anti%20bias%20framework%20pamphlet.pdf
Wafford, M., & Rigaud, V. (2019, March). The role of critical consciousness in Montessori teacher training: Part 1. Workshop presented at the annual Montessori Teacher Educators Day, American Montessori Society, Washington, DC.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
Author Agreement
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK
