Geological characterization of the Patterson CO2 storage site from 3-D seismic data

Authors

  • Jenny Meng Kansas Geological Survey
  • Eugene Holubnyak Kansas Geological Survey
  • Franek Hasiuk Kansas Geological Survey
  • Jenn Hollenbach Kansas Geological Survey
  • Dana Wreath Berexco LLC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/mg.v1i.15529

Keywords:

CO2 storage, 3-D seismic interpretation, Patterson Site, Mississippian incised valley

Abstract

Approximately 26 square miles of new 3-D seismic data were acquired in July 2019 over the Patterson Site (Kearny County, Kansas) to assess its potential for carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. Seismic interpretation revealed that the Patterson Site contains multiple structural closures that lie on uplifted fault blocks, bounded by two reverse faults that strike nearly perpendicular to each other. These faults offset Precambrian through Pennsylvanian sections, including several primary reservoir and seal intervals. Fault displacements are maximum at the Precambrian basement and decrease upward. Data indicated a range of structural and combination traps exists at the Patterson Site in the Cambrian-Ordovician Arbuckle through Mississippian Osagian reservoirs. The three-way closures along the NW–SE fault have structural relief of ~130 ft (40 m), and the four-way closures contain relief of ~60 ft (18 m). Erosional surfaces and multiple basement fractures also are observed on the top of the Precambrian. A Mississippian-aged incised valley system also was observed at the Patterson Site. The incised valleys formed during the Meramecian-Chesteran Stages with an incised depth up to 250 ft (76 m). The motion of the reverse faults likely captured existing meandering and linear channels, causing the current deeply incised morphology. The incised valleys observed at Patterson are similar in age, structural style, shape, incision depth, and seismic attribute properties to incised valleys observed by other workers at Pleasant Prairie South, Eubank, and Shuck oil fields (southwest Kansas). Further research should focus on estimating reactivation tendency and sealing characteristics of the reverse faults to evaluate the seal integrity of the saline reservoirs. This will reduce uncertainty concerning the risk of CO2 migration during injection and storage. Further reservoir description, modeling, and simulation are also underway to characterize the storage potential at the Patterson Site.

References

Allmendinger, R. W., Cardozo, N. C., and Fisher, D., 2013, Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors & Tensors: Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, 289 p.

Byrnes, A., Willhite, G. P., Green, D., Pancake, R., Tsau, J. S., Watney, W. L., Doveton, J., Guy, W., Reynolds, R., Murfin, D., Daniels, J., Martin, R., Flanders, W., Vander Griend, D., Mork, E., and Cantrell, P., 2010, Field demonstration of carbon dioxide miscible flooding in the Lansing-Kansas City Formation, Central Kansas: Final Report, Award Number DE-AC26-00BC15124. http://www.kgs.ku.edu/CO2/Reports/Final_Report_March2010.pdf

Dubois, M. K., Williams, E. T., Youle, J. C., and Hedke, D. E., 2015, Potential for CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery in four southwest Kansas oil fields, an extended abstract; in Modeling CO2 sequestration in saline aquifer and depleted oil reservoir to evaluate regional CO2 sequestration potential of Ozark Plateau aquifer system, south-central Kansas, W. L. Watney, J. Rush, and J. Raney, eds.: final report, award number DE-FE0002056, p. IV1–IV19. doi:10.2172/1262248

Gupta, M., Spikes, K., and Hardage, B., 2017, Characterization of naturally fractured Arbuckle Group in the Wellington Field, Kansas, using S-wave amplitude variation with offset: Interpretation, v. 5, no. 1, p. T49–T63.

Hawkes, C. D., Bachu, S., Haug, K., and Thompson, A. W., 2005, Analysis of in-situ stress regime in the Alberta Basin, Canada, for performance assessment of CO2 geological sequestration sites: Proceedings Fourth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, p. 2–5.

Holubnyak, Y., Dubois, M., Bidgoli, T., Wreath, D., Watney, L., Stover, S., Newell, D., Fazelalavi, F., Hollenbach, A., Jennings, J., Steincamp, C., Schremmer, J., Jordan, B., Crabtree, B., Christensen, J., McFarlane, D., Doveton, J., Krishnamurthy, K., Byron, M., and Watts, K., 2018, Integrated CCS for Kansas (ICKan) Final Technical Report. doi:10.2172/1491482

Holubnyak, Y., Dubois, M., and Hollenbach, J., 2020, Selecting CO2 sinks CCUS deployment in South Mid-West Kansas; in Gas Injection into Geological Formations and Related Topics, Y. Wu, J. J. Carroll, M. Hao, and W. Zhu, eds.: Beverly, Massachusetts, Scrivener Publishing, p. 161–183.

Holubnyak, Y., Dubois, M., Hollenbach, J., and Hasiuk, F., 2019, Challenges and opportunities for commercial-scale carbon capture and storage in Kansas: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, p. 1–10.

Holubnyak, Y., Watney, W., Birdie, T., Rush, J., and Fazelalavi, M., 2016, Reservoir modeling of CO2 injection in Arbuckle saline aquifer at Wellington Field, Sumner County, Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2016-29, 150 p.

Holubnyak, Y., Watney, L., Hollenbach, J., Birdie, T., Fazelalavi, M., Bidgoli, T., Schwab, D., Nolte, A., Tsoflias, G., Victorine, J., Graham, B., Doveton, J., Bruns, J., Blazer, B., and Wreath, D., 2017, Small scale field test demonstrating CO2 sequestration in Arbuckle saline aquifer and by CO2-EOR at Wellington Field, Sumner County, Kansas: final report, award number DE-FE00006821. https://www.netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/2018-02/DE-FE00006821-Final-reportV6.pdf

KGS (Kansas Geological Survey), 2001, Background: The Hugoton Project: an industry-university-government study of the oil & gas resources of southwest Kansas. http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Hugoton/background.html

KGS (Kansas Geological Survey), 2007, Hugoton Asset Management Project (HAMP): Hugoton Geomodel Final Report: Kansas Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2007-6. http://www.kgs.ku.edu//PRS/publication/2007/OFR07_06/index.html

Merriam, D. F., 1963, The geologic history of Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 162, 317 p.

Metz, B., Davidson, O., and De Coninck, H., eds., 2005, Carbon dioxide capture and storage: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change: New York, Cambridge University Press, 442 p.

Miller, R. D., Raef, A. E., Byrnes, A. P., Lambrecht, J. L., and Harrison, W. E., 2004, 4-D high-resolution seismic reflection monitoring of miscible CO2 injected into a carbonate reservoir in the Hall-Gurney Field, Russell County, Kansas [Exp. Abs.]: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 2,259–2,262.

Newell, K. D., Watney, W. L., Cheng, W. L., and Brownrigg, R. L., 1989, Stratigraphic and spatial distribution of oil and gas production in Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Subsurface Geology Series 9, 86 p.

Ohl, D., and Raef, A., 2014, Rock formation characterization for carbon dioxide geosequestration: 3D seismic amplitude and coherency anomalies, and seismic petrophysical facies classification, Wellington and Anson-Bates Fields, Kansas, USA: Journal of Applied Geophysics, v. 103, p. 221–231.

Rader, K., 1987, Petrographic and subsurface analysis of Pennsylvanian Morrow sandstones of southwestem Kansas: M.S. thesis, University of Colorado, 106 p.

Raef, A. E., Miller, R. D., Byrnes, A. P., and Harrison, W. E., 2005, Rock physics and seismic modeling guided application of 4D-seismic attributes to monitoring enhanced oil recovery CO2-flood in a thin carbonate reservoir, Hall Gurney Field, Kansas, U.S.A. [Abs.]: Annual conference of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, June 19–22, 2005, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Raef, A. E., Miller, R. D., Franseen, E. K., Byrnes, A. P., Watney, W. L., and Harrison, W. E., 2005, 4D seismic to image a thin carbonate reservoir during a miscible CO2 flood: Hall-Gurney field, Kansas, USA: The Leading Edge, v. 24, no. 5, p. 521–526.

Schlumberger, 2015, Recommended seismic volume attributes: Schlumberger product sheet poster. https://www.software.slb.com/products/petrel/petrel-geophysics/multitrace-attribute

Schwab, D. R., Bidgoli, T. S., and Taylor, M. H., 2017, Characterizing the potential for injection-induced fault reactivation through subsurface structural mapping and stress field analysis, Wellington Field, Sumner County, Kansas: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, v. 122, p. 10,132–10,154. doi:10.1002/2017JB014071

Sullivan, M., Rodosta, T., Mahajan, K., and Damiani, D., 2019, An overview of the Department of Energy’s CarbonSAFE Initiative: Moving CCUS toward commercialization: AIChE Journal, e16855.

Watney, W. L., Rush, J., and Raney, J., 2016, Modeling CO2 sequestration in saline aquifer and depleted oil reservoir to evaluate regional CO2 sequestration potential of Ozark Plateau aquifer system, south-central Kansas, final report, Award Number: DE-FE0002056. doi:10.2172/1262248

Yielding, G., Freeman, B., and Needham, T., 1997, Quantitative fault seal prediction: AAPG Bulletin, v. 81, p. 897–91.

Youle, J. C., 1991, Sequence stratigraphy of the lower Middle Pennsylvanian in the eastern Hugoton Embayment of southwestern Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Open-File Report 91-52, p. 142–172. http://www.kgs.ku.edu/PRS/publication/1991/OFR91_52/Youle/

Downloads

Published

2020-11-24

How to Cite

Meng, J., Holubnyak, E., Hasiuk, F., Hollenbach, J., & Wreath, D. (2020). Geological characterization of the Patterson CO2 storage site from 3-D seismic data. Midcontinent Geoscience, 1, 52-90. https://doi.org/10.17161/mg.v1i.15529