Monitoring Changes in Groundwater Resources Due to Increased Surface Water Delivery Efficiencies in the Lower Republican River Basin

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/mg.v4i.20851

Keywords:

Groundwater, Irrigation Canals, Surface Water, Buried Laterals, Water Resources

Abstract

Groundwater and surface water, including such engineered surface water bodies as irrigation canals and drainage ditches, are connected. As such, changes to the management of these surface water bodies will affect interconnected groundwater systems as well. In the Lower Republican River Basin in Kansas, United States, a regional irrigation district has converted several irrigation canals to buried pipe to reduce water lost to evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge, increasing the delivery efficiency of its system. The objective of this work was to investigate the change in local groundwater levels due to this conversion. Seven existing wells in the vicinity of converted or soon-to-be converted irrigation canals were equipped with pressure transducers, and hourly water-level measurements were collected over several years. Average water levels decreased in all wells post-conversion compared to measurements taken between 1970 and 2001. The water levels did not decrease equally, and in several wells, the water-level variance also changed from pre- to post-conversion. It is hypothesized that the observed changes are controlled by many factors, including those related to canal conversion (proximity to the converted canal and time since canal conversion), proximity to other surface water features such as the main stem of the canal and reservoir, and subsurface characteristics that influence the rate of infiltration from precipitation events. This research highlights the interconnectedness of surface and subsurface water resources and how water management decisions need to consider how these interactions may change to support sustainable water use.

References

Arnell, N. W., 1999, Climate change and global water resources: Global Environmental Change, v. 9, p. S31–S49.

Barlow, P. M., and Leake, S. A., 2012, Streamflow depletion by wells — Understanding and managing the effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow: United States Geological Survey Circular no. 1376, 84 p. https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1376/

Conant, B., Robinson, C. E., Hinton, M. J., and Russell, H. A. J., 2019, A framework for conceptualizing groundwater-surface water interactions and identifying potential impacts on water quality, water quantity, and ecosystems: Journal of Hydrology, v. 574, p. 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.050

Cosgrove, W. J., and Loucks, D. P., 2015, Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions: Water Resources Research, v. 51, no. 6, p. 4,823–4,839.

Fleckenstein, J. H., Krause, S., Hannah, D. M., and Boano, F., 2010, Groundwater-surface water interactions: New methods and models to improve understanding of processes and dynamics: Advances in Water Resources, v. 33, no. 11, p. 1,291–1,295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.09.011

Graf, W. L., 1999, Dam nation: A geographic census of American dams and their large-scale hydrologic impacts: Water Resources Research, v. 35, no. 4, p. 1,305–1,311.

Graf, W. L., 2006, Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers: Geomorphology, v. 79, no. 3–4, p. 336–360.

KDA (Kansas Department of Agriculture), 2023, Kansas Bostwick Irrigation District. https://agriculture.ks.gov/divisions-programs/dwr/interstate-rivers-and-compacts/republican-river-compact/kansas-bostwick-irrigation-district

KGS (Kansas Geological Survey), 2023a, Water Information, Management, and Analysis System [data set]: Kansas Geological Survey. https://geohydro.kgs.ku.edu/geohydro/wimas/

KGS (Kansas Geological Survey), 2023b, Water Well Completion Records [data set]: Kansas Geological Survey. https://www.kgs.ku.edu/Magellan/WaterWell/index.html

Lewandowski, J., Meinikmann, K., and Krause, S., 2020, Groundwater-surface water interactions: Recent advances and interdisciplinary challenges: Water, v. 12, no. 1, p. 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010296

Magilligan, F. J., and Nislow, K. H., 2005, Changes in hydrologic regime by dams: Geomorphology, v. 71, no. 1–2, p. 61–78.

MardanDoost, D., Brookfield, A. E., Feddema, J., Sturm, B., Kastens, J., Peterson, D., and Bishop, C., 2019, Estimating irrigation demand with geospatial and in-situ data: Application to the high plains aquifer, Kansas, USA: Agricultural Water Management, v. 223, 105675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.06.010

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 2023, Climate Data Online [data set]: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/cdo-web/

Rogers, P., and Hall, A. W., 2003, Effective water governance: Stockholm, Global Water Partnership Technical Committee, TEC Background Papers No. 7, 48 p.

Simon, A., and Rinaldi, M., 2006, Disturbance, stream incision, and channel evolution: The roles of excess transport capacity and boundary materials in controlling channel response: Geomorphology, v. 79, no. 3–4, p. 361–383.

Sophocleous, M., and Sawin, R. S., 1998, Safe yield and sustainable development of water resources in Kansas: Kansas Geological Survey, Public Information Circular 9. https://kgs.ku.edu/safe-yield-and-sustainable-development-water-resources-kansas

State of Kansas v. State of Nebraska and State of Colorado, 126 U.S., 2002, https://agriculture.ks.gov/docs/default-source/iwi---republican-river-compact/rrca_2002_fss.pdf?sfvrsn=2c94b8c1_12

Stewart, I. T., Cayan, D. R., and Dettinger, M. D., 2005, Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America: Journal of Climate, v. 18, no. 8, p. 1,136–1,155.

Szilágyi, J., 2014, MODIS-aided water-balance investigations in the Republican River basin, USA: Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, v. 58, no. 1, p. 33–46.

Theis, C. V., 1935, The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage: American Geophysical Union Transactions, v. 16, p. 519–524.

Vörösmarty, C. J., Pahl-Wostl, C., and Bhaduri, A., 2013a, Water in the anthropocene: new perspectives for global sustainability: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 5, no. 6, p. 1–4.

Vörösmarty, C. J., Pahl-Wostl, C., Bunn, S. E., and Lawford, R., 2013b, Global water, the anthropocene and the transformation of a science: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 5, no. 6, p. 539–550.

Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L., and Alley, W. M., 1998, Ground water and surface water: A single resource. 1139 United States Geological Survey Circular 9. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/cir1139

Zhang, J., Huo, A., Zhao, Z., Yang, L., Peng, J., Cheng, Y., and Wang, Z., 2022, Impact of mountain reservoir construction on groundwater level in downstream loess areas in Guanzhong Basin, China: Water, v. 14, no. 9, p. 1,470. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091470

Zhang, M., Dong, Y., and Sun, P., 2012, Impact of reservoir impoundment-caused groundwater level changes on regional slope stability: a case study in the Loess Plateau of Western China: Environmental Earth Sciences, v. 66, no. 6, p. 1,715–1,725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1728-6

Zipper, S. C., Farmer, W. H., Brookfield, A., Ajami, H., Reeves, H. W., Wardropper, C., Hammond, J. C., Gleeson, T., and Deines, J. M., 2022, Quantifying streamflow depletion from groundwater pumping: A practical review of past and emerging approaches for water management: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, v. 58, no. 2, p. 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12998

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Brookfield, A., Layzell, A., Zhou, T., & Tian, B. (2023). Monitoring Changes in Groundwater Resources Due to Increased Surface Water Delivery Efficiencies in the Lower Republican River Basin. Midcontinent Geoscience, 4, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.17161/mg.v4i.20851