The Limits of Recognition
PDF (English)

Hvordan referere

Adelman, R. A. (2020). The Limits of Recognition: Rethinking Conventional Critiques of Drone Warfare. American Studies, 59(1), 93-111. https://journals.ku.edu/amsj/article/view/8242

Sammendrag

The persistence of drone warfare despite years of anti-drone activism suggests a need to rethink prevailing frameworks for opposing this kind of violence.  Anti-drone activism often hinges on a pair of assumptions about the power of recognition: that drone technologies dehumanize their targets and thus encourage operators to kill wantonly and, as a corollary, that if drone operators recognized the humanness of their targets, they would be unable or unwilling to kill them.  Both premises, I suggest, are faulty.  Yet they remain entrenched as conventional wisdom despite evidence to the contrary, like high rates of ‘burnout’ and PTSD among drone operators.  In this paper, I query the limitations of recognition as an antidote to drone warfare and the politics of this type of anti-militarist praxis.  I take as my objects of inquiry three artifacts of American drone warfare: a 2014 report from the Stimson Center Task Force on US Drone Policy; a public art installation in Pakistan called Not a Bug Splat; and “In Times of Peace,” a playful set of ‘drone selfies’ staged by the IOCOSE collective.  I read across this somewhat disparate archive and conclude with a consideration of emerging discourses about the trauma that drone operators experience.  Ultimately, I demonstrate that the emphasis on recognition actually amounts to a misidentification of the conditions by which drone warfare proceeds while also operating in complicity with discourses about the U.S. as an exceptional, and only reluctantly violent, power.

PDF (English)

All items © Mid-America American Studies Association

Authors: If you prefer to remove your text(s) from this database please contact the editor.

Statistikk

Laster statistikk…