Investigating the negative fan behaviors of a branded collegiate basketball student section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jas.v0i0.5714Keywords:
fan violence, perception control theory, intended violence, outcome violenceAbstract
Branded collegiate student sections (e.g., the Cameron Crazies at Duke University) have been identified as the most committed supporters of the team. The marketing benefits of these groups have been documented yet the potential negative consequences have gone unexplored in the literature. This study aimed to understand what types of behavior fans in this context engaged in, why they engaged in these actions, and attempts to link some of these observations to relevant theory on fan violence. A multiple method design was employed in order to obtain both breadth and depth of the phenomenon as well as for data triangulation. Ten members of a large, collegiate basketball fan group participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews and extensive fieldwork of the fan group was conducted over the course of a season. Finally, 197 members of the same college basketball fan group responded to a survey questionnaire. The results of this study indicated there are negative consequences linked to the behavior of members of the branded student section. University officials should be aware of the potential danger of these branded student sections and strengthen relations and authority over these groups to minimize the likelihood of negative fan behavior.
References
A summit on best practices in responding to developing and ongoing civil disturbances in college communities (2005, November 10). Retrieved December 2, 2007, from www.dps.iastate.edu/nspcd/index.html
Asmussen, K.J. & Creswell, J.W. (1995). Campus response to a student gunman. Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 575-591.
Branscombe, N.R., & Wann, D.L. (1992). Role of identification with a group, arousal, categorization processes, and self-esteem in sports spectator aggression. Human Relations, 45(10), 1013-1029.
Clayman, S.E.(1993). Booing: The anatomy of a disaffiliative response
American Sociological Review , 58 (1): 110-131.
Coakley, J. (2004). Sports in society: Issues and controversies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
Crow, D.A. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs, issue experts, and water rights policy change in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 27(3), 299-315.
Dunning, E., Murphy, P., & Williams, J. (1986). Spectator violence at football matches. British Journal of Sociology, 37, 221-244.
Dunning, E., Murphy, P., & Williams, J. (1988). The roots of football hooliganism: An historical and sociological study. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eitzen, S. D. (1981). Sport And Deviance. In George Sage and
Gunther Luschen (Eds.), Handbook of Social Science of Sport. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.
Ellington, R. (2007). “Schools cheer new branding effort”. Sport Business Journal, February 26, 2007.
Finn, G. (1994). Football Violence: A societal psychological perspective. In Giulianotti, R., Bonney, N., and Hepworth M. (Eds.), Football, Violence, and Social Identity. New York: Routledge.
Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social forces, 217-223.
Goldstein, J.H. (1989). Violence in sports. In J.H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social and psychological viewpoints (pp. 279-297) (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2004). Research methods for sport studies. New York: Routledge.
Gruca, T. (2005, October 24). NCAA looks at collapsible goal posts. Retrieved December 2, 2007, from http://wcco.com/topstories/goal.posts.football.2.352267.html
Harrison, P. (1974). Soccer’s tribal wars. New Society, 29, 602-604.
Hart, P. (1998). Preventing groupthink revisited: Evaluating and reforming groups in government. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2/3), 306-326.
Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
KSN Television. (2015, February 25). K-State police announce action for student who bumped KU’s Jamari Traylor. KSN Television. Retrieved from http://ksn.com/2015/02/25/k-state-police-announce-action-for-student-who-bumped-kus-jamari-traylor/.
Lang, G. E. (1981). Riotous outbursts at sports events. In George Sage and Gunther Luschen (Eds.), Handbook of Social Science of Sport . Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.
Le Bon, G. (1960, originally published in 1895). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. New York: Viking.
Lewis, J.M. (1972). A study of the Kent State incident using Smelser's theory of collective behavior." Sociological Inquiry, 42 (2): 87-96.
Lott, A.J., & Lott, B.E. (1965). Group cohesiveness and interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedents and consequence variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-309.
Mann, L. (1979). Sports crowds viewed from the perspective of collective behavior. In J.H. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games, and play: Social & psychological viewpoints (pp.337-368) (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McPhail, C. (1991). The myth of the madding crowd. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter Publishing Company.
McPhail, C. (1994). The Dark Side of Purpose: Individual and Collective Violence in Riots. Sociological Quarterly, 35(1):1-32.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
mmc-news.com (2015, October 17). Michigan punter’s social media threats prompt response by AD. Retrieved from http://mmc-news.com/news-michigan-punter-and-8217;s-social-media-threats-prompt-response-by-ad-274937.dbv.
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2008). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
Muñiz, A.M., & O’Guinn, T.C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.
Mustonen, A., Arms, R.L., & Russell, G.W. (1996). Predictors of sports spectators’ proclivity for riotous behavior in Finland and Canada. Personal Individual Differences, 21(4), 519-525.
NCAA president: instilling sportsmanship rests with schools. (2006, October 20). Retrieved December 2, 2007, from http://www.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/stories/102006adb.html
O’Toole, T. (2002, April 9). ‘Celebratory riots’ creating crisis on campus. USA Today, Retrieved December 2, 2007, from http://www.usatoday.com/sports/other/2002-04-09-fan-violence.htm
Polisar, D. and Wildavsky, A. (1989). From individual to system blame: A cultural analysis of historical change in the law of torts." Journal of Policy History, 1 (2): 129-155.
Sampson, Robert J. and Stephen W. Raudenbush. (1999). Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 105: 603-51.
Schweingruber, D., & Wohlstein, R.T. (2005). The madding crowd goes to school: Myths about crowds in introductory sociology textbooks. Teaching Sociology, 33(2), 136-153.
Simons, Y., & Taylor, J. (1992). A psychosocial model of fan violence in sports. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 23, 207-226.
Smelser, N.J. (1963). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.
Spaiij, R. (2014). Sports crowd violence: An interdisciplinary synthesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 146-155.
Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
Report on the sportsmanship and fan behavior summit (2003, February 23). Retrieved December 2, 2007, from http://www.ncaa.org/sportsmanship/sportsmanshipFanBehavior/report.pdf
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel and L. W. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Turner, R.H., & Killian, L.M. (1972). The field of collective behavior. 2nd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: The Free Press.
Wann, D.L. (1993). Aggression among highly identified spectators as a function of their need to maintain positive social identity. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17(2), 134-143.
Wann, D.L., & Dolan, T.J. (1994). Spectators’ evaluations of rival and fellow fans. The Psychological Record, 44, 351-358.
Wann, D.L., Carlson, J.D., & Schrader, M.P. (1999). The impact of team identification on the hostile and instrumental verbal aggression of sport spectators. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(2), 279-286.
Wann, D.L., Schrader, M.P., & Carlson, J.D. (2000). The verbal aggression of sport spectators: A comparison of hostile and instrumental motives. International Sports Journal, 4, 56-63.
Wann, D.L., Hunter, J.L., Ryan, J.A., & Wright, L.A. (2001). The relationship between team identification and willingness of sports fans to consider illegally assisting their team. Social Behavior and Personality, 29(6), 531-536.
Wann, D.L., Melnick, M.J., Russell, G.W., & Pease, D.G. (2001). Sport fans: The psychology and social impact of spectators. NewYork: Routledge.
Wann, D.L., Culver, Z., Akanda, R., Daglar, M., Divitiis, C., & Smith, A. (2005). The effects of team identification and game outcomes on willingness to consider anonymous acts of hostile aggression. Journal of Sport Behavior, 28(3), 282-294.
Wright, S.C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 859-879.
Yoshida, M., Gordon, B., Heere, B., & James, J.D. (2015). Fan community identification: An empirical examination of its outcomes in Japanese professional sport. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 24(2), 105-119.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) License
1. License. You retain the copyright for your work. You here by grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, sublicensable license to:
• Reproduce, distribute and display the edited manuscript in the Journal of Amateur Sport (and other publications prepared by us or on our behalf) in any media now or hereafter known (including without limitation electronic publications such as the Internet, Google Scholar, and social media)
We do not restrict your distribution or use of the manuscript following publication in the Journal of Amateur Sport (in fact, we encourage it!). However, we have the right to publish the manuscript first on the journal website. Thus, the foregoing licenses are exclusive to us prior to our publication of the manuscript. You confirm that you have disclosed to us all previous or pending public disseminations of the manuscript, including without limitation any publications or acceptances by other journals or disseminations via websites or conference proceedings.
2. Other Confirmations. You confirm that you are the manuscripts sole author(s); you have the right to convey the foregoing licenses; the manuscript does not infringe any third party copyright, publicity/privacy right or other proprietary right; and the manuscript is not defamatory or otherwise unlawful. You shall defend and indemnify us against all claims based on any alleged breach of your confirmations in this contract.
Compensation: You will receive one (1) free copy (PDF) of the article published online in the Journal of Amateur Sport. You will receive no royalty or other monetary return from the Journal of Amateur Sport for use of the article. You do, however, have our extreme gratitude!
3. Entire Contract. This contract is the sole and exclusive agreement between the parties regarding the manuscript and supersedes all prior conversations and understandings regarding its subject matter. This contract may be modified or supplemented only by a mutually signed writing.
