Social Justice Education in an Urban Charter Montessori School
Keywords:Keywords, Montessori, race, class, integration, urban, charter
As the Montessori Method continues its expansion in public education, a social justice lens is needed to analyze its contributions and limitations, given the increase in racial and socioeconomic diversity in the United States. Furthermore, much of the work in Social Justice Education (SJE) focuses on classroom techniques and curriculum, overlooking the essential work of school administrators and parents, whose work significantly influences the school community. The current study applied an SJE framework to the efforts of one urban, socioeconomically and racially integrated Montessori charter school. We examined the extent to which SJE principles were incorporated across the school community, using an inductive, qualitative, case-study approach that included meetings, surveys, focus groups, and interviews. Administrators quickly adopted a system-wide approach, but parents—often color-blind or minimizing of the relevance of race—consistently resisted. Study results imply a continued need for an institutional approach, not solely a classroom or curricular focus, when integrating social justice into Montessori schools.
Adiche, C. N. (2009, July). The danger of a single story [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story?language=en
Apfelbaum, E. P., Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 918–932. doi: 10.1037/a0011990
Ansari, A., & Winsler, A. (2014). Montessori public school pre-K programs and the school readiness of low-income Black and Latino children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1066–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036799
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (n.d.). Making excellence inclusive. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/making-excellence-inclusive
Banks, J. A., Cookson, P., Gay, G., Hawley, W. D., Irvine, J. J., Nieto, S., … Stephan, W. G. (2001). Diversity within unity: Essential principles for teaching and learning in a multicultural society. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3), 196–198, 200–203.
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brown, K. (2015, November 16). Advancing Montessori public policy, expanding access and equity [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://montessoriforsocialjustice.org/mppi/
Brown, K. E. (2016, March). Reading & math achievement for third grade African American students in public Montessori schools. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Montessori Society, Chicago, IL.
Brown, K. E., & Steele, A. S. (2015). Racial discipline disproportionality in Montessori and traditional public schools: A comparative study using the relative rate index. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1):14–27.
Carlisle, L. R., Jackson, B. W., & George, A. (2006). Principles of social justice education: The social justice education in schools project. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39(1), 55–64. doi: 10.1080/10665680500478809
Cossentino, J. (2005). Ritualizing expertise: A non?Montessorian view of the Montessori method. American Journal of Education, 111(2), 211–244. doi: 10.1086/426838
Debs, M. (2015, March). Racial and economic diversity in US public Montessori schools. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Montessori Society, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://montessoriforsocialjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Debs.AMSPubMontessoriDiversity2.pdf
Dohrmann, K. R., Nishida, T. K., Gartner, A., Lipsky, D. K., & Grimm, K. J. (2007). High school outcomes for students in a public Montessori program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 205–217. doi: 10.1080/02568540709594622
Duffy, M., & Duffy, D. (2002). Children of the universe: Cosmic education in the Montessori elementary classroom. Hollidaysburg, PA: Parent Child Press.
Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity in higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.
Hall, H. R., & Murray, A. K. (2011). Intersections between Montessori practices and culturally-based curriculum for African-American students. [White paper]. American Montessori Society Research Committee.
Hsieh, H-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. doi: 10.3102/00028312032003465
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W., IV. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
Lewis, A. E., & Diamond, J. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lewis-McCoy, R. L. (2014). Inequality in the promised land. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lillard, A. S. (2012). Preschool children’s development in classic Montessori, supplemented Montessori, and conventional programs. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 379–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.001
Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313, 1893–1894. doi: 10.1126/science.1132362
Mallett, J. D., & Schroeder, J. L. (2015). Academic achievement outcomes: A comparison of Montessori and non-Montessori public elementary school students. Journal of Elementary Education, 25(1), 39–53.
Mildred, J., & Zúñiga, X. (2004). Working with resistance to diversity issues in the classroom: Lessons from teacher training and multicultural education. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 74(2), 359–375. doi: 10.1080/00377310409517721
Montessori, M. (1989). To educate the human potential. Oxford, England: Clio Press.
National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2014). Growth of Montessori in the public sector: 1975–2014. Washington, DC: Author.
Nevarez, C., & Wood, J. L. (2007). Developing urban school leaders: Building on solutions 15 years after the Los Angeles riots. Educational Studies, 42(3), 266–280. doi: 10.1080/00131940701634676
Neville, H. A., Awad, G. H., Brooks, J. E., Flores, M. P., & Bluemel, J. (2013). Color-blind racial ideology: Theory, training, and measurement implications in psychology. American Psychologists, 68(6), 455–466. doi: 10.1037/a0033282
Pahlke, E., Bigler, R. S., & Suizzo, M.-A. (2012). Relations between colorblind socialization and children’s racial bias: Evidence from European American mothers and their preschool children. Child Development, 83(4), 1164–1179. doi: 10.1111j.1467-8624.2012.01770.x
Shafer, L. (2016, May 20). Education, by all means: Launching a community-wide effort to break down the barriers to success for low-income students. [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/16/05/education-all-means
Spencer, M. L., Reno, R., powell, j. a., & Grant-Thomas, A. (2009). The benefits of racial and economic integration in our education system: Why this matters for our democracy. Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://www.kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/reports/2009/02_2009_EducationIntegrationBenefitsReport.pdf
Stansbury, J. (2012). Dealing with diversity: Administrator, teacher and parent perceptions of the responsiveness of Montessori schools to racial and ethnic diversity (Unpublished master’s thesis). DePaul University, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from https://amshq.org/Publications-and-Research/Research-Library/~/media/9E1F8E5CC6E2496E8FE8E183D3BE98BE.ashx
Tatum, B. D. (2003). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? And other conversations about race. New York, NY: BasicBooks.
Ungerer, R. A. (2009). Educating for peace and social justice: Reflections on the 2009 AMS annual conference. Montessori Life, 21(2), 5.
U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Search for schools and colleges. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/globallocator/
Vega, S., Crawford, H. G., & Van Pelt, J.-L. (2012). Safe schools for LGBTQI students: How do teachers view their role in promoting safe schools? Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(2), 250–260. doi:10.1080/10665684.2012.671095
Whitescarver, K. & Cossentino, J. (2008). Montessori and the mainstream: A century of reform on the margins. Teachers College Record, 110(12), 2571–2600.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Designs and methods (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors can view article download statistics for published articles within their accounts.
Journal of Montessori Research
The following is an agreement between the Author (the “Corresponding Author”) acting on behalf of all authors of the work (“Authors”) and the Journal of Montessori Research (the “Journal”) regarding your article (the “Work”) that is being submitted for consideration.
Whereas the parties desire to promote effective scholarly communication that promotes local control of intellectual assets, the parties for valuable consideration agree as follows.
A. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S GRANT OF RIGHTS
After being accepted for publication, the Corresponding Author grants to the Journal, during the full term of copyright and any extensions or renewals of that term, the following:
1. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to reproduce, republish, transmit, sell, distribute, and otherwise use the Work in electronic and print editions of the Journal and in derivative works throughout the world, in all languages, and in all media now known or later developed.
2. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to create and store electronic archival copies of theWork, including the right to deposit the Work in open access digital repositories.
3. An irrevocable non-exclusive right to license others to reproduce, republish, transmit,and distribute the Work under the condition that the Authors are attributed. (Currently this is carried out by publishing the content under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 license (CC BY-NC.)
4. Copyright in the Work remains with the Authors.
B. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S DUTIES
1. When distributing or re-publishing the Work, the Corresponding Author agrees to credit the Journal as the place of first publication.
2. The Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Journal of any changes in contact information.
C. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR’S WARRANTY
The Corresponding Author represents and warrants that the Work is the Authors’ original work and that it does not violate or infringe the law or the rights of any third party and, specifically, that the Work contains no matter that is defamatory or that infringes literary or proprietary rights, intellectual property rights, or any rights of privacy. The Corresponding Author also warrants that he or she has the full power to make this agreement, and if the Work was prepared jointly, the Corresponding Author agrees to inform the Authors of the terms of this Agreement and to obtain their written permission to sign on their behalf. The Corresponding Author agrees to hold the Journal harmless from any breach of the aforestated representations.
D. JOURNAL’S DUTIES
In consideration of the Author’s grant of rights, the Journal agrees to publish the Work, attributing the Work to the Authors.
E. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This agreement reflects the entire understanding of the parties. This agreement may be amended only in writing by an addendum signed by the parties. Amendments are incorporated by reference to this agreement.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ON BEHALF OF ALL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS WORK