Why Montessori Education Did Not Take Root in Portugal—or Did It?
Selective Reception, Curricular Convergence, and Pedagogical Invisibility
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v12i2.25316Mots-clés :
Montessori education, Portugal, educational transfer, institutionalization, curriculum policyRésumé
Montessori education has circulated transnationally for more than a century, yet its institutional consolidation has varied markedly across national contexts. Portugal offers a revealing case: Montessori ideas entered pedagogical debate during the First Republic, appearing in legislation and local initiatives, but they did not stabilize as a continuous public or professional infrastructure. This qualitative historical-policy document study examines how Montessori pedagogy was received and translated in Portugal, which institutional conditions constrained consolidation, and how Montessori-compatible principles relate to the 1997 and 2016 versions of Orientações Curriculares para a Educação Pré-Escolar (OCEPE) [Curriculum Guidelines for Pre-Primary Education]. The study combines direct analysis of Alberty’s 1918 report and the two OCEPE editions with a source-based synthesis of Portuguese educational historiography. Educational transfer, policy translation, and institutional theory guide explicit criteria for historical visibility, institutional recognition, and curricular convergence. Pedagogical invisibility is refined as a provisional heuristic for a bounded configuration: documented reception, discontinuous institutional anchoring, and later conceptual compatibility without explicit genealogical attribution. The construct is distinguished from Bernstein’s invisible pedagogy, and curricular similarity is not treated as evidence of direct transmission. Portugal illustrates how a pedagogical tradition may remain historically legible while becoming institutionally and genealogically opaque.
Références
Alberty, R. R. y. (1918). Relatório sobre o curso internacional de pedagogia scientifica da Dr.a Maria Montessori realizado em Barcelona na primavera de 1916. Separata do Anuário da Casa Pia de Lisboa de 1916–1917.
Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Vol. 3. Towards a theory of educational transmissions. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Cardona, M. J. (1997). Para a história da educação de infância em Portugal: O discurso oficial (1834–1990). Porto Editora.
Castanheira, M. L. P. (2006). Escola infantil de Bragança (1915-1934): Modernidade pedagógica e as primeiras práticas de educação de infância no interior [Master’s thesis, University of Lisbon].
Castanheira, M. L. P. (2013). Para a história da educação de infância em Portugal: O caso de Bragança (1934– 1986) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon].
Cowen, R. (2009). The transfer, translation and transformation of educational processes: And their shape-shifting? Comparative Education, 45(3), 315– 327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060903184916
de Brouwer, J., Klaver, L. T., Sins, P. H. M., & van der Zee, S. (2026). Implementation of Montessori education: Validity evidence of Dutch teacher questionnaires for Montessori practices. Journal of Montessori Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v12i1.24724
de Brouwer, J., Morssink-Santing, V., & van der Zee, S. (2024). Validation of the Teacher Questionnaire of Montessori Practice for Early Childhood in the Dutch context. Journal of Montessori Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v10i1.21543
Debs, M. (2019). Diverse families, desirable schools: Public Montessori in the era of school choice. Harvard Education Press.
Debs, M., de Brouwer, J., Murray, A. K., Lawrence, L., Tyne, M., & von der Wehl, C. (2022). Global diffusion of Montessori schools: A report from the 2022 Global Montessori Census. Journal of Montessori Research, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v8i2.18675
Gomes-Ferreira, A., Mota, L., & Vilhena, C. (2021). Educação de infância em Portugal: Discursos, projetos e práticas (1834–1974). Revista Colombiana de Educación, 1(82), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num82-10812
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Lillard, A. S. (2017). Montessori: The science behind the genius (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lillard, A. S., & McHugh, V. (2019). Authentic Montessori: The Dottoressa’s view at the end of her life, part I: The environment. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.7716
Manique da Silva, C., & Vilhena, C. (2024). Viajar, conhecer e comparar: Ricardo Rosa y Alberty e o curso de Pedagogia Montessori (Barcelona, 1916). Educação e Pesquisa, 50, Article e272474. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202450272474
Ministério da Educação. (1997). Orientações curriculares para a educação pré-escolar. Departamento da Educação Básica, Núcleo de Educação Pré-Escolar.
Montessori, M. (1967). The Montessori Method (A. E. George, Trans.). Schocken Books. (Original work published 1912)
Montessori, M. (2012). The absorbent mind. Start Publishing. (Original work published 1949)
Murray, A. K., Ahlquist, E.-M. T., McKenna, M. K., & Debs, M. (Eds.). (2023). The Bloomsbury handbook of Montessori education. Bloomsbury Academic.
Murray, A. K., Daoust, C. J., & Chen, J. (2019). Developing instruments to measure Montessori instructional practices. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.9797
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (Eds.). (2004). Educational policy borrowing: Historical perspectives. Symposium Books.
Quarfood, C. (2022). The Montessori movement in interwar Europe: New perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14072-3
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE.
Silva, I. L. da, Marques, L., Mata, L., & Rosa, M. (2016). Orientações curriculares para a educação pré-escolar [Curriculum Guidelines for Pre-Primary Education]. Ministério da Educação, Direção-Geral da Educação.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. Teachers College Press.
Whitescarver, K., & Cossentino, J. (2008). Montessori and the mainstream: A century of reform on the margins. Teachers College Record, 110(12), 2571–2600. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811001202
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Joana Alves Cunha 2026
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
