Montessori and Non-Montessori Early Childhood Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusion and Access

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4944

Palavras-chave:

inclusion, attitudes, Montessori, early childhood, teachers, access

Resumo

Montessori and non-Montessori general education early childhood teachers were surveyed about their attitudes towards including children with disabilities and providing access in their classrooms.  Both groups reported similar and positive supports for inclusion within their schools. Montessori teachers reported having less knowledge about inclusion and less special education professional development than their non-Montessori counterparts.   Implications for professional development and teacher preparation are described.

Biografia do Autor

  • Natalie Danner, University of Connecticut Health
    Natalie Danner, Ph.D. is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Connecticut Health Center.  in this role, she provides technical assistance to states to build and sustain professional development systems for early childhood teachers.  Natalie received her Ph.D. in Early Childhood Special Education from the Unversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.  Her research interests include teacher attitudes towards inclusion and connections between Montessori education and inclusion.
  • Susan Fowler, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Susan Fowler is active in research related to families of young children with developmental delays and issues involving access to early intervention and early care and education services. She received her doctorate in child development from the University of Kansas in 1979 and has served on the faculty at the University of Illinois since 1990 as department head, associate dean and dean of the college. She has also served on the national level as president of the Division of Early Childhood (DEC) of the Council of Exceptional Children (CEC) (1992), president of CEC (2009) and of the Higher Education Consortium of Special Education (HECSE) (1998-99). Dr. Fowler has an extensive history of federal and state funding for her research and scholarship; federal funding has come from NIMH, OSEP in the USDE, HHS, and at the state level from the Board of Education and Human Services. She serves on many editorial boards as a reviewer or associate editor. She currently directs three state funded projects that provide information to families and teachers working with children birth to five as well as policy makers and co-directs a doctoral leadership grant for students pursuing doctorates in the area of early childhood special education and EI.

Referências

American Montessori Society (AMS). (2014). AMS teacher education programs. Retrieved

from http://www.amshq.org/Teacher%20Resources/AMS%20Teacher%20Education%20Programs.aspx

American Montessori Society (AMS). (2014). Introduction to Montessori. Retrieved from

http://www.amshq.org/Montessori%20Education/Introduction%20to%20Montessori/Montessori%20Schools.aspx

Burke, K., & Sutherland, C. (2004). Attitudes toward inclusion: Knowledge vs. experience.

Education, 125(2), 163-172.

Buysse, V., Skinner, D., & Grant, S. (2001). Toward a definition of quality inclusion:

Perspectives of parents and practitioners. Journal of Early Intervention, 24(2), 146-161.

Cossentino, J. (2010). Following all the children: Early intervention and Montessori. Montessori

Life, 1(8), 1-8.

DEC / NAEYC. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for

Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.

Epstein, A. (1997). How teachers accommodate for young children with special needs.

Montessori Life, 9(3), 32-34.

Epstein, A. (1998). "The behavior part is the hardest": Montessori teachers and young children

with challenging behaviors. Montessori Life, 10(4), 24-25.

Epstein, A. M. (1996; 1996). Teacher accommodation for individual differences in integrated

Montessori early childhood classrooms. (University of Maryland College Park, University of Maryland College Park). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses,

Hurley, J. J., & Horn, E. M. (2010). Family and professional priorities for inclusive early

childhood settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 32, 335-350.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§

et seq. (2004).

Kahn, B. (2009). 2009 NAMTA baseline special education survey. The North American

Montessori Teachers' Association Journal, 34(2), 181-196.

Kirk, S., Gallagher, J., J., Coleman, M. R., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2011). Educating exceptional

children (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

Knoche, L., Peterson, C. A., Edwards, C. P., & Jeon, H. (2006). Child care for children with and

without disabilities: The provider, observer, and parent perspectives. Early Childhood

Research Quarterly, 21(1), 93-109.

Lillard, A., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). The early years: Evaluating Montessori education. Science,

(5795), 1893-1894.

McKenzie, G. K. &. Zascavage, V. (2012). Montessori instruction: A model for inclusion in

early childhood classrooms and beyond. Montessori Life, 24(1), 20-25.

Miller, L. B., Dyer, J. L., Stevenson, H., & White, S. H. (1975). Four preschool programs: Their

dimensions and effects. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,

, 1-170.

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2012). Guidance on

NAEYC accreditation criteria: All criteria document. Retrieved from

http://www.naeyc.org/files/academy/file/AllCriteriaDocument.pdf

National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (2011). Research synthesis points on

practices that support inclusion. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.

Odom, S. L., Buysse, V., & Soukakou, E. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities:

A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 344-356.

Pickering, J. S. (1992). Successful applications of Montessori methods with children at risk for

learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 42(1), 90-101.

Pickering, J. S. (2008). Montessorians helping children who learn differently. The North

American Montessori Teachers' Association Journal, 33(2), 77-99.

Sandall, S. R., Hemmeter, M. L., Smith, B. J., & McLean, M. E. (2005). DEC recommended

practices: A comprehensive guide for practical applications in early intervention/ early childhood special education. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.

Sandall, S. R., & Schwartz, I. S. (2008). Building blocks for teaching preschoolers with special

needs (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Pub Co.

Schwartz, I. S., Sandall, S. R., Odom, S. L., Horn, E., & Beckman, P., J. (2002). "I know it when

I see it": In search of a common definition of inclusion. In S. Odom (Ed.), Widening the

circle: Including children with disabilities in preschool programs (pp. 10-24). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office

of Special Education Programs. (2009). 28th annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2006 vol. 1. ( No. Contract No. ED01CO0082/0008). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

Wolfe, J. (2002). Learning from the past: Historical voices in early childhood education (2nd

ed., pp. 225-248). Mayerthorpe, Alberta, Canada: Piney Branch Press.

Downloads

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2015-11-14

Edição

v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Journal of Montessori Research

Seção

Articles

Como Citar

Danner, N., & Fowler, S. (2015). Montessori and Non-Montessori Early Childhood Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusion and Access. Journal of Montessori Research, 1(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v1i1.4944