Outpatient Oncology Fall Risk: A Quality Improvement Study

Authors

  • Stephanie Hammontree, MSN, RN, OCN Cancer Center, Blood and Marrow Transplant, The University of Kansas Health System
  • Maryellen Potts, Ph.D. University of Kansas School of Nursing
  • Adam Neiberger Cancer Quality, University of Kansas Health System
  • Danielle Olds, MPH, Ph.D., RN Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, University of Missouri-Kansas City
  • Daniel English University of Kansas School of Nursing
  • Jamie S. Myers, Ph.D., RN, AOCNS, FAAN School of Nursing, University of Kansas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-9261

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.20271

Keywords:

outpatient, oncology, falls, quality improvement

Abstract

Introduction. Patients receiving cancer treatment are at high risk for falls. No current guidelines or standards of care exist for assessment and prevention of outpatient oncology falls. This quality improvement project’s purpose was to 1) describe and evaluate outpatient oncology falls data to determine root cause(s) and develop, implement, and evaluate intervention strategies for future policy refinement, and 2) compare fall rates pre/post implementation of a system-wide Ambulatory Fall Risk Bundle.

Methods. Retrospective data were used to describe and categorize fall incidence for the University of Kansas Cancer Center over 12 months. Further analyses were conducted to describe fall rates per 10,000 kept appointments pre/post implementation of an Ambulatory Fall Risk Bundle protocol. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical assistants and nurse managers to evaluate the initiative’s impact, staff satisfaction, and recommendations for refinement.

Results. The initial 12-month assessment yielded 58 patient falls retained for further analyses. Most patients were receiving chemotherapy (79%). Common contributing symptoms included dizziness/faintness and weakness (43%). Tripping/falling over a hazard (24%) and falls during transfer (5.8%) also were cited. Subsequent analyses of fall rates per 10,000 kept appointments pre/post implementation of the Ambulatory Fall Risk Bundle indicated no change. Recommendations from the qualitative interviews included: orthostatic vital sign protocol implementation, redesign of the electronic medical record fall risk alert, stakeholder involvement in protocol development and related education, and additional assistive devices/equipment. 

Conclusions. System-related policy and culture change, investment in physical and human resource enhancements, and evidence-based protocols are needed to improve outpatient oncology fall rates.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

  • Stephanie Hammontree, MSN, RN, OCN, Cancer Center, Blood and Marrow Transplant, The University of Kansas Health System

    This is the first author for the manuscript

  • Maryellen Potts, Ph.D., University of Kansas School of Nursing

    This is the second author for the manuscript

  • Adam Neiberger, Cancer Quality, University of Kansas Health System

    Third author

  • Danielle Olds, MPH, Ph.D., RN, Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, University of Missouri-Kansas City

    Fourth author

  • Daniel English, University of Kansas School of Nursing

    Fifth author

  • Jamie S. Myers, Ph.D., RN, AOCNS, FAAN, School of Nursing, University of Kansas

    I am the corresponding author. But please list me as the sixth (senior) author for the manuscript. Stephanie Hammontree is first author.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-24

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Hammontree, S., Potts, M., Neiberger, A., Olds, D., English, D., & Myers, J. S. (2023). Outpatient Oncology Fall Risk: A Quality Improvement Study. Kansas Journal of Medicine, 16(2), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.20271