DO YOU HAVE FAITH IN PSYCHOANALYSIS? Imagination as the key ingredient for the effectiveness of psychotherapy

David Antolínez

doi:10.17161/aion.v2i1.24018

Autores/as

David Antolínez independent researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/aion.v2i1.24018

Palabras clave:

figurability, imagination, psychoanalysis, scientism

Resumen

According to Isabelle Stengers, modern medicine has expelled hypnosis and suggestion in order to achieve scientificity. However, imagination is always present in treatments – especially those related to mental health – so it might be worthwhile to explain this phenomenon instead of reducing it or ruling it out. In this article, we shall explore how classic psychoanalysis has remained within this rationale and some alternatives to be found in contemporary authors. This requires a profound revision of the notions of factuality and fictionality that have determined the development of psychoanalysis, a discipline oscillating between scientific aspirations and literary sensitivities. Guided by the emphasis in ontology given by philosophers such as Michel Serres, Bruno Latour and Donna Haraway, we will provide a constructivist and prospective account of psychotherapy as a process in which imagination is not bounded to the human mind and as a refined practice that enables the patient to embrace her becoming. Thus, imagination can be reintroduced as the chief cornerstone for the parallel healing of the patient’s illness and psychoanalysis’ epistemological paradoxes.

Referencias

Ashmore, M., Brown, S. D., & Macmillan, K., 2005, “Lost in the Mall with Mesmer and Wundt: Demarcations and Demonstrations in the Psychologies”, in Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol.30, no.1, 76-110.

de Roode, J., 2025, Doctors by Nature. How Ants, Apes, and Other Animals Heal Themselves, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

Freud, S., 1955, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, London, Hogarth Press.

Green, A., 2001, Life Narcissism, Death Narcissism, London, Free Association Books.

Grünbaum, A., 1999, “The Hermeneutic Versus the Scientific Conception of Psychoanalysis: An Unsuccessful Effort to Chart a Via Media for the Human Sciences”, in Aerts, D., Broekaert, J. & Mathijs, E. (eds.), Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection, Brussels, VUB University Press, 219-40.

Haraway, D., 1991, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature, New York, Routledge.

Haraway, D., 2016, Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, Duke University Press.

Lacan, J., 1955, “Variations of the Standard Treatment”, in Lacan, J. (comp.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, 2006, New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 296-302.

Lacan, J., 1966, “Science and Truth”, in Lacan, J. (comp.) Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, 2006, New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 726-45.

Langley, P., Simon, H., Bradshaw, G. & Zytkow, J., 1987, Scientific Discovery. Computational Explorations of the Creative Process, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Laplanche, J. & Pontalis, J.B., 1988, The Language of Psycho-Analysis, London, Karnac Books.

Latour, B., 2013, An Inquiry into the Modes of Existence. An anthropology of the moderns, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Meltzer, D., 1987, “On aesthetic reciprocity”, in Journal of Child Psychotherapy, vol.3, no.2, 3–14.

Modell, A., 1978, “The Nature of Psychoanalytic Knowledge”, in Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, vol.26, no.3, 641–58.

Morrison, H., McBriar, S., Powell, H., Proudfoot, J., Stanley, S., Fitzgerald, D. & Callard, F., 2019, “What is a Psychological Task? The Operational Pliability of ‘Task’ in Psychological Laboratory Experimentation”, in Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, vol.5, 61-85.

Nathan, T. & Stengers, I., 2018, Healers and Doctors, London, Polity Press.

Noë, A., 2012, Varieries of Presence, Cambridge, Havard University Press.

Ogden, T., 1992, “Comments on transference and countertransference in the initial analytic meeting”, in Psychoanalytic Inquiry, vol.12, no.2, 225–47.

Ogden, T., 2019, “Ontological Psychoanalysis or 'What Do You Want to Be When You Grow Up?'”, in The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, vol. 88, no.4, 661-84.

Ogden, T., 2021, “Analytic Writing as a Form of Fiction”, in Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, vol.69, no.1, 221-23.

Prigogine, I., 1999, “Einstein and Magritte. A Study of Creativity”, in Aerts, D., Broekaert, J. & Mathijs, E. (eds.), Einstein Meets Magritte: An Interdisciplinary Reflection, Brussels: VUB University Press, 99-106.

Rycroft, C., 1968, Imagination and Reality. Psycho-Analytical Essays 1951-1961, London, Maresfield Library.

Serres, M., 1982, Hermes. Literature, Science, Philosophy, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.

Slife, B., Ghelfi, E. & Fox, S., 2018, “Psychotherapy and Scientism”, in Grant, E. & Williams, R. (eds.), On Hijacking Science. Exploring the Nature and Consequences of Overreach in Psychology, New York, Routledge, 68-84.

Stengers, I., 1997, “Black Boxes; or, Is Psychoanalysis a Science?”, in Stengers, I. (comp.), Power and Invention. Situating Science, 1997, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 79-108.

Stengers, I., 2024, Hypnosis Between Science and Magic, London, Bloomsbury Academic.

Winnicott, D., 1971, Playing and Reality, London, Tavistock Publications.