Contributors and Constraints to Involvement with Youth Sports Officiating
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jas.v1i2.4946Keywords:
officiating, youth sports, involvement, constraintsAbstract
There is a growing concern about the shortage of sports officials and its impact on organized youth sport. The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of psychosocial factors that impact involvement with youth sports officiating by comparing and contrasting the experiences of officials from two distinct sports. In-depth interviews were conducted with baseball umpires and lacrosse officials. Resulting themes were classified as either contributors or constraints to involvement with officiating. The most striking difference between the two groups was the support provided in terms of mentorship, training, and administrative consideration. The baseball umpires received greater support and this was a key factor in overcoming constraints and fostering a sense of community. Implications and strategies for recruiting and retaining officials are discussed.
References
Anshel, M. H., & Weinberg, R. S. (1999). Re-examining coping among basketball referees following stressful events: Implications for coping interventions. Journal of Sport Behavior 22(2), 141-161.
Beaton, A. A., Funk, D. C., Ridinger, L., & Jordan, J. (2011). Sport involvement: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Sport Management Review, 14, 126-140.
Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9, 119-127.
Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309-320.
Cuskelly, G., & Hoye, R. (2004). Problems and issues in recruitment and retention of sports officials. A report prepared for the Australian Sports Commission. Brisbane Queensland: Griffith University.
Dorsch, K. D., & Paskevich, D. M. (2006). Stressful experiences among six
certification levels of ice hockey officials. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 585-593.
Forbes, S. L., & Livingston, L. A. (2013). Changing the call: Rethinking attrition and retention in the ice hockey officiating ranks. Sport in Society, 16(3), 295-309.
Furst, D. M. (1989). Sport role socialization: Initial entry into the subculture of officiating. Journal of Sport Behavior, 12(1), 41-52.
Furst, D. M., (1991). Career contingencies: Patterns of initial entry and continuity in collegiate sports officiating. Journal of Sport Behavior, 12(2), 93-102.
Godbey, G., Crawford, D. W., & Shen, X. S. (2010). Assessing hierarchical leisure constraints theory after two decades. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(1), 111-134.
Goldsmith, P. A., & Williams, J. M. (1992). Perceived stressors for football and volleyball officials from three rating levels. Journal of Sport Behavior, 15(2), 106-118.
Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A
comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3), 294-308.
Green, C. (2005). Building sport programs to optimize athlete recruitment, retention, and transition: Toward a normative theory of sport development. Journal of Sport Management, 19, 233-253.
Henderson, K. A. (1991). Dimensions of choice: A qualitative approach to recreation, parks, and leisure research. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc.
Henderson, K. A., & Allen, K. A. (1991). The ethic of care: Leisure possibilities and constraints for women. Society and Leisure, 14, 97-113.
Henderson, K. A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (1991). A sense of entitlement to leisure as constraint and empowerment to women. Leisure Sciences, 13, 51-65.
Henderson, K. A., Stalnaker, D., & Taylor, G. (1988). The relationship between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(1), 69-80.
Hubbard, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2001). Testing competing models of leisure constraint negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23, 145-163.
Jackson, E. L. (1988). Leisure constraints: A survey of past research. Leisure Sciences, 10, 203-215.
Jackson, E. L., Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15(1), 1-11.
Kaissidis-Rodafinos, A., & Anshel, M. H. (2000). Psychological predictors of coping responses among Greek basketball referees. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 329-344.
Kaissidis-Rodafinos, A., Anshel, M. H., & Porter, A. (1997). Personal and situational factors that predict coping strategies for acute stress among basketball referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(4), 427-436.
Kay, T. (1998). Having it all or doing it all? The construction of women’s lifestyles in time-crunched households. Society and Leisure, 21(2), 435-454.
Kay, T., & Jackson, E. L. (1991). Leisure despite constraints: The impact of leisure constraints on leisure participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 301-313.
Kellett, P., & Shilbury, D. (2007). Umpire participation: Is abuse really the issue? Sport Management Review, 10, 209-229.
Kellett, P., & Warner, S. (2011). Creating communities that lead to retention: The social worlds and communities of umpires. European Sport Management Quarterly, 11(5), 471-494.
Maume, D. (2008). Gender differences in providing urgent childcare among dual-earner parents. Social Forces, 87, 273-297.
Neuman, W. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Phillips, P., & Fairley, S. (2014). Umpiring: A serious leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(2), 184-202.
Purdy, D. A., & Snyder, E. E. (1985). A social profile of high school basketball officials. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8(1), 54-65.
Rainey, D. (1995). Sources of stress among baseball and softball umpires. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7, 1-10.
Rainey, D. W., & Hardy, L. (1999). Sources of stress, burnout and intention to terminate among rugby union referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 797-806.
Read, D. (2000). Stars in stripes. Athletic Management, 22(6), 26-32.
Rothchild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 216-217.
Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, leisure, and constraint: Towards a framework for the analysis of women’s leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 8-22.
Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego involvements, social attitudes and identifications. New York: Wiley.
Sherif. M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in reaction to communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, A. H., Daniel, J. V., Leith, L., & Burke, R. J. (1990). Perceived stress,
psychological burnout and paths to turnover intentions among sport officials. Applied Sport Psychology, 2, 84-97.
Thornley, G. (2010, January 5). Crisis looms due to shortage of high-caliber referees. The Irish Times. Retrieved from http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/sport/2010/0105 1224261662983.html
Tingle, J. K., Warner, S., & Sartore-Baldwin, M. L. (2014). The experience of former women officials and the impact on the sporting community. Sex Roles, 71, 7-20.
Topp, B. (2001, May). Sports officials becoming endangered species. The National Association of Sports Officials. Retrieved from http://www.naso.org/Research/st80.htm
Warner, S., Tingle, J. K., & Kellett, P. (2013). Officiating attrition: The experiences of former referees via a sport development lens. Journal of Sport Management, 27(4), 316-328.
White, D. D. (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 30, 342.359.
Wiley, C. G. E., Shaw, S. M., & Havitz, M. E. (2000). Men’s and women’s
involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure
involvement. Leisure Sciences, 22, 19-31.
Wolfson, S., & Neave, N. (2007). Coping under pressure: Cognitive strategies for maintaining confidence among soccer referees. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30(2), 232-247.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) License
1. License. You retain the copyright for your work. You here by grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, sublicensable license to:
• Reproduce, distribute and display the edited manuscript in the Journal of Amateur Sport (and other publications prepared by us or on our behalf) in any media now or hereafter known (including without limitation electronic publications such as the Internet, Google Scholar, and social media)
We do not restrict your distribution or use of the manuscript following publication in the Journal of Amateur Sport (in fact, we encourage it!). However, we have the right to publish the manuscript first on the journal website. Thus, the foregoing licenses are exclusive to us prior to our publication of the manuscript. You confirm that you have disclosed to us all previous or pending public disseminations of the manuscript, including without limitation any publications or acceptances by other journals or disseminations via websites or conference proceedings.
2. Other Confirmations. You confirm that you are the manuscripts sole author(s); you have the right to convey the foregoing licenses; the manuscript does not infringe any third party copyright, publicity/privacy right or other proprietary right; and the manuscript is not defamatory or otherwise unlawful. You shall defend and indemnify us against all claims based on any alleged breach of your confirmations in this contract.
Compensation: You will receive one (1) free copy (PDF) of the article published online in the Journal of Amateur Sport. You will receive no royalty or other monetary return from the Journal of Amateur Sport for use of the article. You do, however, have our extreme gratitude!
3. Entire Contract. This contract is the sole and exclusive agreement between the parties regarding the manuscript and supersedes all prior conversations and understandings regarding its subject matter. This contract may be modified or supplemented only by a mutually signed writing.
