More than a House of Cards: Developing a Firm Foundation for Streaming Media and Consumer-Licensed Content in the Library




This article will introduce traditional library practice for licensing multimedia content and discuss the way that consumer-licensing and streaming services disrupt that practice. Sections II and III describe the statutory copyright regime designed by Congress to facilitate the socially-valuable work done by libraries and the impact of the move from ownership to licensed content. Collecting multimedia materials has always presented special legal challenges for libraries, particularly as licensed content has replaced the traditional practice of purchasing and circulation based on the first sale doctrine. These issues have grown even more complex as streaming services like Netflix and Amazon and video game downloads through services like Steam have come to dominate the landscape. Section IV will describe the way that consumer-licensed materials, which not only remove the ownership that undergirds library practice, but also the ability to negotiate for library use, imperil the congressionally-designed balance. Section V will present a path forward for libraries to develop robust, cutting-edge collections that reflect a sophisticated understanding of the contractual and copyright issues at play.


Metrics Loading ...



Aufderheide, P. & Jaszi, P. (2011). Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Band, J. (2011). The Impact of Substantial Compliance with Copyright Exceptions on Fair Use. Retrieved from:

Band, J. (2016). A New Approach to Copyright Exceptions and Limitations. Retrieved from:

Bartow, A. (2003). Electrifying Copyright Norms and Making Cyberspace More Like a Book. Villanova Law Review, 48, 13

Burk, D. & Cohen, J. (2001). Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 15, 41

Brief amici curiae of American Library Association, et al. filed.

Chiang, O. (2011, Feb. 9). The Master of Online Mayhem, Forbes. Retrieved from:

Becker, P. (2005). Books and Libraries in American Society During World War II: Weapons in the War of Ideas 49. New York. Routledge

Birnbaum, D. (2015, Dec. 10). Golden Globes: ‘Casual’ Comedy Series Nom Marks Hulu’s Awards Arrival, VARIETY. Retrieved from:

Birnbaum, D. & Riley, J. (2015, Jan. 12). Golden Globes Winner Amazon Is Hollywood’s ‘New Best Friend’, VARIETY. Retrieved from:

Butler, B. (2015). Transformative Teaching and Educational Fair Use After Georgia State. Connecticut Law Review, 48, 473.

Cichocki, K. (2008). Unlocking the Future of Public Libraries: Digital Licensing that Preserves Access, University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal 16, 29

Cox, K. (2016). Policy Notes: Why is the Copyright Office Trying to Reform Section 108?, Retrieved from:

Cross, W. (2012). Restoring the Public Library Ethos: Copyright, E-Licensing, and the Future of Librarianship, LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL, 104(2). 195

DeCandido, K. (1990). How do you catalog a video game? Bowling Green, Michigan, and Ohio band together for truth, justice, and collection development, Library Journal, 115, 30

DeCesare, J. (2014). The Mass Market and Consumer Tools. Library Technology Reports. 50(2), 33-39.

Dewan, P. (2010). Why your academic library needs a popular reading collection now more than ever. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(1), 44-64

Dimmock, N. (2007). A Popular DVD Collection in an Academic Library. New Library World, 108 (3/4) 142

Farb, S. (2006). Libraries, Licensing and the Challenge of Stewardship. First Monday, 11(7) Retrieved from:

Feiler, L. (2012). Birth of the First-Download Doctrine-the Application of the First-Sale Doctrine to Internet Downloads Under EU and US Copyright Law. Journal of Internet Law, 16, 1

Friedman, M. (2010). Nine Years and Still Waiting: While Congress Continues to Hold Off on Amending Copyright Law for the Digital Age, Commercial Industry Has Largely Moved on, Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal. 17, 637-649

Gasaway, L. N. (2000). Values conflict in the digital environment: Librarians versus copyright holders. Colum.-VLA JL & Arts, 24, 115.

Gasaway, L. N. (2007). Amending the copyright act for libraries and society: the Section 108 Study Group. Alb. L. Rev., 70, 1331-1615.

Gerhardt, D. R., & Wessel, M. F. (2010). Fair use and fairness on campus.North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, 11.

Gilbertson, M., McKee, E. C., & Salisbury, L. (2014). Just in case or just in time? Outcomes of a 15-month patron-driven acquisition of e-books at the University of Arkansas libraries. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 38(1-2), 10-20.

Hallman, P. (2013). Media Minder--Building a Video Game Collection: Resources to Help you Get Started. Against the Grain, 20(5), 33.

Hansen, D. R. (2011). A state law approach to preserving fair use in academic libraries. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 22(1).

Harris, C. S. (2010). Terms of service, cramped budgets, and good library citizenship: the Netflix dilemma. The Bottom Line, 23(4), 212-214.

Hartman, R. (2008, Jan. 8). Loaning a Kindle to Patrons a No-No for Libraries? Tinfoil + Raccoon Retrieved from:

Healy, C. (2010). Netflix in an academic library: A personal case study.Library Trends, 58(3), 402-411.

Hess, E. (2012). Code-ifying copyright: an architectural solution to digitally expanding the first sale doctrine. Fordham L. Rev., 81, 1965.

Hirtle, P. B. (2005). Research, Libraries, and Fair Use: The Gentlemen's Agreement of 1935. J. Copyright Soc'y USA, 53, 545.

Hirtle, P. (2010, Sept. 18). Using Netflix in a Library, Library Law Blog. Retrieved from:

Huguenin-Love, J. (2014). Song on Wire: A Technical Analysis of Redigi and the Pre-Owned Digital Media Marketplace. NYU J. Intell. Prop. & Ent. L., 4, 1.

Jones, D. R. (2013). Locked collections: copyright and the future of research support.

Kaya, T. (2010). Academic libraries add Netflix subscriptions. Chronicle of Higher Education Blogs. Retrieved September, 15, 2014.

King, R. (2014). House of cards: The academic library media center in the era of streaming video. The Serials Librarian, 67(3), 289-306.

Klinefelter, A. (2001). Copyright and electronic library resources: an overview of how the law is affecting traditional library services. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 19(3-4), 175-193.

Koberidze, M. (2015). The DMCA Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail or Safe?.Maryna

Koberidze, The DMCA Rulemaking Mechanism: Fail or Safe, 11.

Laskowski, M., & Ward, D. (2009). Building next generation video game collections in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,35(3), 267-273.

Lange, D., & Anderson, J. L. (2001, November). Copyright, Fair Use and Transformative Critical Appropriation. In Proceedings der Conference on the Public Domain.

Lehman, B. A. (1995). Intellectual property and the national information infrastructure: The report of the working group on intellectual property rights. Diane Publishing.

Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin.

Long III, H. S. (2007). Reconsidering the balance of the digital first sale debate: re-examining the case for a statutory digital first sale doctrine to facilitate second-hand digital media markets. Ala. L. Rev., 59, 1183.

Makuch, E. (2015, April 29). PS4s With Pre-Installed PT Listed on eBay for as Much as $1,800. Gamespot. April 29, 2015. Retrieved from:

Molloy, P. E. (2014, Feb. 21). How Amazon's Latest Pilot Could Reshape Public Understanding of Trans People, The Advocate, FRetrieved from:

McKenzie, E. (2013). Book by Any Other Name: E-Books and the First Sale Doctrine, A. Chi.-Kent J. Intell. Prop., 12, 57.

McIntyre, S. (2014). Game over for first sale. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 29(1). Retrieved from:

Nagy, A. (2011). Next-generation service in the library. Library Technology Reports, 47(7), 8.

Nelson, N. J. (2013, Sept. 18). Do The Netflix Emmy Nods Mean YouTube is Next?, Huffington Post. Retrieved from:

Nicholson, S. (2013). Playing in the past: a history of games, toys, and puzzles in north american libraries. The Library, 83(4).

Nimmer, D. (2000). A riff on fair use in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148(3), 673-742.

Nolan, S. (2011). Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: How a Drastic Remodeling of 17 USC Sec. 108 Could Help Save Academia. J. Intell. Prop. L., 19, 457.

Pallante, M. A. (2012). Next Great Copyright Act, The. Colum. JL & Arts, 36, 315.

Parsons, L. T. (2015). Learning from preservice teachers’ responses to trans-themed young adult literature: improving personal practice in teacher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1-15.

Pavel, A. M. (2009). Reforming the reproduction right: The case for personal use copies. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 1615-1645.

Perzanowski, A., & Schultz, J. (2010). Digital exhaustion. UClA l. reV., 58, 889.

Pessach, G. (2008). [Networked] Memory Institutions: Social Remembering, Privatization and its Discontents. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 26, 71.

Price, J. S., & McDonald, J. D. (2009). Beguiled by Bananas: A Retrospective Study of the Usage and Breadth of Patron vs. Librarian Acquired Ebook Collections.

Public Knowledge, (2016, Aug. 8). The Growing List of How the Copyright Office Has Failed Us. Retrieved from:

Rosenberger, M., & Weston, C. (2005). Overview of the Libraries and Archives Exception in the Copyright Act: Background, History, and Meaning. US Copyright Office.

Rasenberger, M. (2010). Copyright Issues and Section 108 Reform. Colum. JL & Arts, 34, 15.

Reese, R. A. (2002). First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks, The.BCL Rev., 44, 577.

Richardson, J. H. (2014). The Spotify Paradox: How the Creation of a Compulsory License Scheme for Streaming On-Demand Music Platforms Can Save the Music Industry. UCLA Ent. L. Rev., 22, 45-95.

Ringer, B. (1981). Authors' Rights in the Electronic Age: Beyond the Copyright Act of 1976. Loy. LA Ent. LJ, 1, 1.

Robertson, M. D., Light, E., Walter, G., & Lipworth, W. (2016). Psychiatry and the ‘Gay Holocaust’–the lessons of Jill Soloway’s Transparent.Australasian Psychiatry, 1039856216649773.

Rothchild, J. (2004). The Incredible Shrinking First-Sale Rule: Are Software Resale Limits Lawful?. Rutgers Law Review, 57(1).

Samuelson, P. (2012). Is copyright reform possible. Harvard L aw Review, 126.

Sandoval, G. (2008, Dec. 15). Reselling MP3s: The music industry's new battleground?, CNet. Retreived from:

Saunders, J. S. Origins of the 'Gentlemen's Agreement'of 1935. Reprography and Copyright Law, Lowell H. Hattery and George B. Bush (eds.), American Institute of Biological Sciences (Washington, DC 1964).

Savage, P. (2015, Mar. 16). Valve on customer service support: “we have to do better,” PC Gamer,. Retrieved from:

Schiller, N. (2008). A portal to student learning: what instruction librarians can learn from video game design. Reference Services Review, 36(4), 351-365.

Section 108 Study Group. (2008). The Section 108 Study Group Report. Retrieved from:

Serra, T. (2013). Rebalancing at resale: Redigi, royalties, and the digital secondary market. BUL Rev., 93, 1753.

Senft, A. (2012). Louder! -This is a Library! The Case for Video Game Programs in Public Libraries. Journal of the Library Administration & Management Section, 9(1).

Sharp, J. (2002). Coming soon to pay-per-view: How the digital Millennium Copyright Act enables digital content owners to circumvent educational fair use. American Business Law Journal, 40(1), 1.

Simon, D. A. (2009). Teaching Without Infringement: A New Model for Educational Fair Use. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 20(2).

Smith, M. S. (2010, Mar. 16). Steam: A Monopoly In the Making. The Escapist. Retrieved from:

Snider, M. (2015, Dec. 16). Cutting the Cord: More Millennials have streaming service than pay-TV, USA Today, Retrieved from:

Spangler, T. (2015, April 22). Streaming Overtakes Live TV Among Consumer Viewing Preferences: Study, Variety. Retrieved from:

Stallman, R. (2013, Dec. 17). Nonfree DRM'd Games on GNU/Linux: Good or Bad? GNU Project. Retrieved from:

Stephens, M. (2010). Using Netflix at an Academic Library. Tame the Web. Available at:

Tappeiner, E., & Lyons, C. (2008). Selection criteria for academic video game collections. Collection Building, 27(3), 121-125.

Walker, J. (2012, Feb. 1). Thought: Do We Own Our Steam Games?. Rock Paper Shotgun. Retrieved from:

Webster, A. (2011, March 14). Steam user violates subscriber agreement, loses $1,800 in games. Ars Technica. March 14. Retrieved from:

Yu, P. K. (2005). P2P and the Future of Private Copying. U. Colo. L. Rev.,76, 653.

Zax, D. (2010). Librarians Gone Wild: Violating Netflix Terms of Use!. Fast Company. Retrieved from:


Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc., 721 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2013).

Authors Guild v. HathiTrust, 755 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2014).

Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U.S. 339, 350-51 (1908).

Cambridge Univ. Pr. et al. v. Becker (N.D. Ga. March 31, 2016).

Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F. Cas. 342 (C.C.D. Mass. 1841) (No. 4901).

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. Ct. 1351 (2013).

Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 448-55 (1984).

Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes, 111 F.Supp.2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).

Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc., 621 F.3d 1102, 1107, 1111 (9th Cir. 2010).


U.S.C. 107

U.S.C. 108

U.S.C. 109

U.S.C. 110

U.S.C. 512

U.S.C. 1201




How to Cite

Cross, W. (2016). More than a House of Cards: Developing a Firm Foundation for Streaming Media and Consumer-Licensed Content in the Library. Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship, 1(1).