Transfer Networks and Talent Flow in the Football Bowl Subdivision Transfer Portal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v19i2.24024Keywords:
college athletes, intercollegiate athletics, mobility, conferences, teamsAbstract
This study applied social network analyses to athlete transfers in the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) transfer portal from 2019-2024. Utilizing a series of graphs, indicators, and descriptive statistics, the portal’s structure and the flow of transfers through conferences and teams were analyzed through a network of effective transfers (i.e., players who made at least one appearance before and after transferring between FBS schools) and a subset of blue-chip transfers (i.e., effective transfers with 4- or 5-star 247 Sports ratings). Results showed autonomous conferences and teams have been central to the portal’s inner workings, with many non-autonomous institutions remaining on the periphery. Nonetheless, the non-autonomous conferences and teams tended to experience net gains in transfer volume while the autonomous institutions suffered net losses. This trend reversed when incoming and outgoing transfers were quantified via their associated talent and experience levels, as the autonomous programs typically acquired more talented players.
Downloads
References
Adams, A. (2024, April 13). 247 Sports rankings FAQ: What they mean, when they come out, what matters the most. 247 Sports. https://247sports.com/article/247sports-rating-explanation-81574/
Byington, A. (2025, January 3). Lane Kiffin calls NCAA transfer portal “a really broke system that’s got to be fixed”. On3. https://www.on3.com/college/ole-miss-rebels/news/lane-kiffin-calls-ncaa-transfer-portal-a-broke-system-thats-got-to-be-fixed/
Coase, R. H. (2013). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 56(4), 837-877.
Corr, C., Bopp, T., & Stokowski, S. (2024). “Necessary evil”: The difficulties of establishing programmatic culture in the transfer portal era. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1435321.
Csárdi, G., Nepusz, T., Traag, V., Horvát, S., Zanini, F., Noom, D., Müller, K., Schoch, D., & Salmon, M. (2025). igraph: Network analysis and visualization in R (Version 2.1.4.9043) [Computer software]. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/index.html
Dohrn, S. L., & Lopez, L. (2022). NCAA transfer portal: Examining quarterback transfer outcomes in college football. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 15(1), 22.
Dumond, J. M., Lynch, A. K., & Platania, J. (2008). An economic model of the college football recruiting process. Journal of Sports Economics, 9(1), 67-87.
Florez, T. (2025, January 15). NCAA’s Baker addresses transfer window issue amid coaches vote. Sports Business Journal. https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2025/01/15/ncaa-charlie-baker-transfer-window/
Frick, B. (2009). Globalization and factor mobility: The impact of the “Bosman-Ruling” on player migration in professional soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(1), 88-106.
Frick, B., & Simmons, R. (2014). The footballers’ labour market after the Bosman ruling. In J. Goddard & P. Sloane (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of professional football (pp. 203-226). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12), 7821-7826.
Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., Smith, M. A., & Himelboim, I. (2020). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
Hosick, M. B. (2018, June 13). New transfer rule eliminates permission-to-contact process. NCAA. http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/newtransfer-rule-eliminates-permission-contact-process
Huml, M. R., Pifer, N. D., Towle, C., & Rode, C. R. (2019). If we build it, will they come? The effect of new athletic facilities on recruiting rankings for Power Five football and men's basketball programs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 29(1), 1-18.
Ji, X., Machiraju, R., Ritter, A., & Yen, P. Y. (2015). Examining the Distribution, Modularity, and Community Structure in Article Networks for Systematic Reviews. 2015 AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 1927–1936.
Juravich, M., & Mills, B. M. (2017). Exogenous policy shock and logic centrality shift: NBA policy and NCAA outcomes. Journal of Sport Management, 31(5), 452-465.
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5), 604-632.
Milanovic, B. (2005). Globalization and goals: Does soccer show the way? Review of International Political Economy, 12(5), 829-850.
Mirabile, M. P., & Witte, M. D. (2017). A discrete-choice model of a college football recruit’s program selection decision. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(3), 211-238.
Nakos, P. (2024, August 23). NCAA Football Oversight Group evaluating elimination of Spring transfer portal. On3. https://www.on3.com/news/ncaa-football-oversight-group-evaluating-elimination-spring-transfer-portal-window/
NCAA. (2025, January 7). Transfer portal data: Division I student-athlete transfer trends. https://www.ncaa.org/sports/2022/4/25/transfer-portal-data-division-i-student-athlete-transfer-trends.aspx
Nixon, W. L., Mayo, Z. A., & Koo, W. (2021). Student-athlete college choice: Division I, II, and III football players. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 14(1), 27.
Olson, M. (2024, October 8). NCAA’s Division I Council votes to shorten transfer windows. ESPN. https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/41686947/ncaa-division-council-votes-shorten-transfer-windows
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453.
PFF. (2025). Learn about PFF player grades. https://www.pff.com/grades
Pifer, N., & Huml, M. R. (2020). The year-two effect: Evidence and antecedents for second season success in NCAA Division I football. Journal of Sports Analytics, 6(1), 45-60.
Pifer, N. D., Huml, M. R., & Asada, A. (2021). Switching schools: Examining the networks, antecedents, and on-court outcomes of NCAA Division I men’s basketball transfers. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 14(1), 30.
Pitts, J. D., & Evans, B. A. (2025). Show me the money! The immediate impact of name, image, and likeness on college football recruiting. Journal of Sports Economics, 26(3), 316-335.
Rascher, D. A., Maxcy, J. G., & Schwarz, A. (2021). The unique economic aspects of sports. Journal of Global Sport Management, 6(1), 111-138.
Rottenberg, S. (1956). The baseball players' labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 64(3), 242-258.
Russo, R. D. (2024, April 17). NCAA allows transfers to be immediately eligible, no matter how many times they’ve switched schools. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/ncaa-transfer-rules-9c1c8b499e21a26e7978f22ed35a380a
Salaga, S. (2015). Competitive balance in American college football: The GI bill, grant-in-aid and the college football association. Essays in Economic & Business History, 33, 116-143.
Stahl, M. (2024, October 25). Nick Saban explains how NIL, transfer portal can lead to more parity in SEC, college football. AL.com. https://www.al.com/alabamafootball/2024/10/nick-saban-explains-how-nil-transfer-portal-can-lead-to-more-parity-in-sec-college-football.html
Walsh, E. (2023, July 20). Lane Kiffin says college football is a “disaster” because of NIL, transfer portal. Bleacher Report. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10083369-lane-kiffin-says-college-football-is-a-disaster-because-of-nil-transfer-portal
Weaver, K. (2021, May 3). The NCAA transfer portal is becoming the wild, wild west. Something needs to change. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/karenweaver/2021/05/03/the-ncaa-transfer-portal-is-like-the-wild-wild-west-something-needs-to-change/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 N. David Pifer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright is held by the authors.
