Designing the Montessori Coaching Tool Elementary Rubric for Early-Career Professional Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v7i2.15866Palavras-chave:
Montessori, rubric, teacher coaching, elementary education, teacher preparation, rubric development, reflective practiceResumo
Becoming a competent Montessori Elementary guide is a complex process, so we are developing the Montessori Coaching Tool Elementary (MCT-EL) rubric to describe teaching-practice expectations for self-reflection and formative feedback during the critical early period in a teacher’s development. The purpose of this article is to share results from a small-scale, online survey collecting both qualitative and quantitative feedback on the rubric from experienced Montessori Elementary teacher educators. The rubric’s content was based on Maria Montessori’s writings and welldocumented Montessori practices, which we translated to specific teacher behaviors and developmental progressions. We wanted to gauge the MCT-EL rubric’s usefulness and appropriateness from the perspective of experts who have significant depth of experience mentoring new teachers. The rubric was not developed to be used for performance evaluation, promotion, or retention but rather for early-career Montessori teachers’ self-reflection. It provides a framework for coaching conversations between the early-career Montessori teacher and a Montessori mentor. Results from the study identified overall support for use of the MCT-EL rubric with developing teachers, along with specific recommendations for revisions, additions, and deletions. Using a thorough review of the data, we developed a refined MCT-EL rubric, which is provided in Appendix B and is available for use by interested practitioners in the field.
Referências
Allen, S., & Knight, J. (2009). A method for collaboratively developing and validating a rubric (EJ1136714). ERIC. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), Article 10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1136714.pdf
Alsina, A., Ayllón, S., Colomer, J., Fernández-Peña, R., Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Pérez-Burriel, M., & Serra, L. (2017). Improving and evaluating reflective narratives: A rubric for higher education students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.015
American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA Publications.
American Montessori Society. (2018). AMS accreditation standards. https://amshq.org/Educators/Montessori-Schools/AMS-Accreditation/Accreditation-Standards
Association Montessori Internationale. (2017–2018). Annette Haines: Spokesperson for Montessori values, scholarship, and research. The NAMTA Journal, 43(1–2).
Association Montessori Internationale. (2009). AMI/USA Montessori school standards. Association Montessori Internationale / USA.
Association Montessori Internationale Canada. (n.d.). AMI Elementary classes: Detailed description. https://www.ami-canada.com/guidelineselementary.html
Baker, K., Hicks, C., Pottish-Lewis, P., & Travis, A. S. (2008). Cosmic education: A collection of talks given by AMI elementary trainers at the 2008 Cosmic Education Workshop. Association Montessori Internationale / USA.
Bartolome, S. J. (2017). Comparing field-teaching experiences: A longitudinal examination of preservice and first-year teacher perspectives. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(3), 264–286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48588621
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Canzoneri-Golden, L., & King, J. (2020). An examination of culturally relevant pedagogy and antibias antiracist curriculum in a Montessori setting. [Doctoral dissertation, Lynn University]. SPIRAL. https://spiral.lynn.edu/etds/360
Chattin-McNichols, J. (1992). The Montessori controversy. Delmar Publishers.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Culclasure, B. T., Daoust, C. J., Cote, S. M., & Zoll, S. (2019). Designing a logic model to inform Montessori research. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.9788
Damore, S., & Rieckhoff, B. (2021). Leading reflective practices in Montessori schools. Journal of Montessori Research, 7(1), 51–65. https://journals.ku.edu/jmr/article/view/14832
Daoust, C., & Suzuki, S. (2013, March 13–17). Montessori magnets and charters: Similarities and differences in implementation. [Poster presentation]. Annual conference of the American Montessori Society, Orlando, FL, United States.
Daoust, C., & Suzuki, S. (2014, March 26–30). Public Montessori elementary: Three models of implementation. [Poster presentation]. Annual conference of the American Montessori Society, Dallas, TX, United States.
Edwards, C. P., Hamel, E., Miller, J. L., & Ren, L. (2020). Improving reflective practice: A documentation rubric for mentoring preservice and in-service teachers. Journal of early Childhood Teacher Education, 41(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1463321
Elish-Piper, L., & L’Allier, S. (2011). Examining the relationship between literacy coaching and student reading gains in grades K-3. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1086/660685
Epstein, P. (2012). An observer’s notebook: Learning from children with the observation C.O.R.E. Montessori Foundation Press.
Feldon, D. F. (2007). The implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9009-0
Furze, J., Gale, J. R., Black, L., Cochran, T. M., & Jensen, G. M. (2015). Clinical reasoning: Development of a grading rubric for student assessment. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 29(3), 34–45. https://journals.lww.com/jopte/Fulltext/2015/29030/Clinical_Reasoning__Development_of_a_ Grading.6.aspx
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley.
Grazzini, B. K. (2010). The role of the disciplines for cosmic education. Communications 2010 Special Issue, 84–93. https://montessoricongress2017.org/images/image/Speaker/BAIBA%20KRUMINS%20GRAZZINI/The%20Role%20of%20the%20Disciplines%20for%20Cosmic%20Education.pdf
Gulikers, J., Brinkman, D., & Runhaar, P. (2021). Using a rubric to grasp intercultural competence development in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(1), 47–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1688854
Huneke Stone, E. (2019). What we’ve learned, and what we’re learning. Montessori Public, (3)3, 7. https://www.montessoripublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/MP_Articles-PDF_V33-Huneke- Stone.pdf
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
Kahn, D. (Ed.). (1995). What is Montessori elementary? North American Montessori Teachers’ Association.
Kraft, M. A., & Blazar, D. (2017). Individualized coaching to improve teacher practice across grades and subjects: New experimental evidence. Educational Policy, 31(7), 1033–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816631099
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Lillard, A., & McHugh, V. (2019a). Authentic Montessori: The environment: The Dottoressa’s view at the end of her life Part I. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.7716
Lillard, A., & McHugh, V. (2019b). Authentic Montessori: The teacher and the child: The Dottoressa’s view at the end of her life Part II. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.9753
Lillard, A. S. (2017). Montessori: The science behind the genius. Oxford University Press.
Lillard, P. P. (1996). Montessori today. Schocken.
MacDonald, G. (2016). Becoming a scientific observer (EJ1125300). ERIC. The NAMTA Journal, (41)3, 132–171. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1125300.pdf
Miller, K. A., Collada, B., Tolliver, D., Audi, Z., Cohen, A., Michelson, C., & Newman, L. R. (2020). Using the modified Delphi method to develop a tool to assess pediatric residents supervising on inpatient rounds. Academic Pediatrics, 20(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2019.07.012
Montessori Australia Foundation. (2012). Montessori National Curriculum, November 2011. The NAMTA Journal, 37(1).
Montessori, M. (1963). Education for a new world. Kalakshetra.
Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori Method (A. E. George, Trans.). Schocken Books. (Original work published 1912)
Montessori, M. (1965). The advanced Montessori Method: Scientific pedagogy as applied to the education of children from seven to eleven years, Vol. I, Spontaneous activity in education. Kalakshetra.
Montessori, M. (1966). The secret of childhood. Fides Publishers.
Montessori, M. (1970). The child in the family. Avon.
Montessori, M. (1971). Four planes of education: Text of a lecture given during the Montessori congress in 1938 in Edinburgh and of another given in London in March 1939. American Montessori Internationale.
Montessori, M. (1972). Education and peace (H. R. Lane, Trans.). Henry Regnery. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (1973). To educate the human potential (5th ed.). Kalakshetra.
Montessori, M. (1976). From childhood to adolescence. Schocken.
Montessori, M. (1988). The discovery of the child. Clio Press. (Original work published 1948)
Montessori, M. (1989). The absorbent mind. Dell Publishing. (Original work published 1949)
Montessori, M. (2008). The child, society, and the world: Unpublished speeches and writings. Montessori- Pierson.
Montessori, M. (1997a). Basic ideas of Montessori’s educational theory: Extracts from Maria Montessori’s writings and teachings. Clio Press.
Montessori, M. (1997b). The California lectures of Maria Montessori, 1915: Unpublished speeches and writings. Clio Press.
Montessori, M. M., Jr. (1976). Education for human development. Schocken.
Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics. McGraw-Hill.
Murray, A., Daoust, C., & Chen, J. (2019). Developing instruments to measure Montessori instructional practices. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(1), 50–87. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v5i1.9797
National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2019). Montessori assessment playbook. Author.
National Center for Montessori in the Public Sector. (2021). Support for new schools and programs adding levels or expanding their scope. https://www.public-montessori.org/services/#support
North America Montessori Teachers’ Association. (2013). Montessori voices: Guided by nature: The house of children. The NAMTA Journal, 38(1), 11–19.
O’Neill, T. A. (2017). An overview of interrater agreement on Likert scales for researchers and practitioners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(777). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00777
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020). A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics. Educational Research Review, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329
Pendersen, H., & Pendersen, J. A. (2008). What is Montessori? A basic guide to the principles, practices, and benefits of a Montessori education. Sandpiper Press.
Pottish-Lewis, P. (2011). Elementary classroom management: How to implement cosmic education. AMI/USA.
Public Montessori in Action. (n.d.). Professional development. https://montessori-action.org/professional-development
Qualtrics. (n.d.). How to increase online survey response rates. https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/tools-increase-response-rate/
Rambusch, N. M., & Stoops, J. A. (1992). The authentic American Montessori school: A guide to the self-study, evaluation, and accreditation of American schools committed to Montessori education. American Montessori Society, the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, and the Commission on Elementary Schools.
Saylor, L. L., McKenzie, G., & Sacco, C. C. (2018). Teacher-centered mentorship as meaningful professional development. Journal of Montessori Research, 4(2), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.17161/jomr.v4i2.6923
Slade, E. G. (2021). Montessori in action: Building resilient Montessori schools. Wiley.
Standing, E. M. (1984). Maria Montessori: Her life and work. New American Library. (Original work published 1957)
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
Tchekmedyian, V., Shields, H. M., Pelletier, S. R., & Pazo, V. C. (2017). The effect of rubric-guided, focused, personalized coaching sessions and video-recorded presentations on teaching skills among fourth-year medical students: A pilot study. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 92(11), 1583–1589. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001686
Timmerman, B. E. C., Strickland, D. C., Johnson, R. L., & Payne, J. R. (2011). Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates’ scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 509– 547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903540991
Van Ginkel, S., Laurentzen, R., Mulder, M., Mononen, A., Kyttä, J., & Kortelainen, M. J. (2017). Assessing oral presentation performance: Designing a rubric and testing its validity with an expert group. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(3), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2016-0012
Vernon-Feagans, L., Kainz, K., Hedrik, A., Ginsburg, M., & Amendum, S. (2013). Live webcam coaching to help early elementary classroom teachers provide effective literacy instruction for struggling readers: The Targeted Reading Intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1175–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032143
Wyld, J. (2019). Making some changes in teacher training. Montessori Public, (3)3, 1–2. https://www.montessoripublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/MP_Articles-PDF_V33-Wyld.pdf
Zugelder, B. S., L’Esperance, M., Conetta, P. J., & Watts, T. (2019). Use of edTPA rubric constructs in teacher induction. In L. Barron, (Ed.), A practical guide for edTPA implementation: Lessons from the field (pp. 415–434). Information Age Publishing.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Angela K. Murray, Ph.D., Carolyn J. Daoust, Ph.D., Jan Mallett, Ph.D.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
