Educational Copying – the “Very Antithesis of Fair Dealing” or WithinCopyright’s “Breathing Space”? Part 3: Principles and Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17161/jcel.v9i1.23129Abstract
This article is the last in a three-part series investigating the kinds of uses of copyrighted textual works that educational institutions may make without permission or fee payment in five common-law countries. The principal concern is educational or classroom copying (unpaid educational uses providing students with access to learning materials such as course readings) and the extent to which such uses may be permissible under the provisions of statutory users’ rights (copyright exceptions and limitations).
References
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197, http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips.pdf
Alberta (Education) v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) [2012] SCC 37 (Can.), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/9997/index.do
American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F.3d 913, 931 (2d Cir. 1995), https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/60/913/565678/
Association of Independent Video and Filmmakers, Independent Feature Project, International Documentary Association, National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture, & Women in Film and Video, Washington, D.C. Chapter. (2005). Documentary filmmakers' statement of best practices in fair use. The Center for Media and Social Impact. https://bit.ly/48UOTl7
Aufderheide, P., & Jaszi, P. (2018). Reclaiming fair use: How to put balance back in copyright (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Bains, N., & Joly, M. (2017, December 17). Letter to Dan Ruimy, chair, Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology [Letter]. Government of Canada. https://bit.ly/4tj7Kyu
Band, J., & Gerafi, J. (2013, May). The fair use/fair dealing handbook. Policybandwidth. http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Fair-Use-Handbook-05072013.pdf
Bartow, A. (1998). Educational fair use in copyright: Reclaiming the right to photocopy freely. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 60(1), 149–230. https://ssrn.com/abstract=506983
Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko’s Graphics Corp., 758 F. Supp. 1522 (S.D.N.Y. 1991), https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/758/1522/1809457/
Bently, L., Dreier, T., Hilty, R., Hugenholtz, B., Quaedvlieg, A., Strowel, A., & Visser, D. (2010). European copyright code. Institute for Information Law. https://www.ivir.nl/copyrightcode/
Boon, M. (2014). From the right to copy to practices of copying. In R. J. Coombe, D. Wershler, & M. Zeilinger (Eds.), Dynamic fair dealing: Creating Canadian culture online (pp. 56–64). University of Toronto Press.
Burrell, R. (2001). Reining in copyright law: Is fair use the answer? Intellectual Property Quarterly, 4, 361–388.
Burrell, R. (2021). The changing judicial politics of copyright exceptions in the UK. In S. Balganesh, H. Sun, & N.-L. Wee Loon (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of copyright limitations and exceptions (pp. 158–173). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671101.013
Burrell, R., & Coleman, A. (2009). Exceptions applying to education, research and private study. In Copyright exceptions: The digital impact (pp. 113–135). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666964.006
Burtle, L. (2022, October 19). GSU Library copyright lawsuit. Georgia State University, College of Law Library. Retrieved March 21, 2023 from https://libguides.law.gsu.edu/gsucopyrightcase
Butler, B. (2015). Transformative teaching and educational fair use after Georgia State. Connecticut Law Review, 309. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/309/
Cambridge University Press v. Albert, No. 12-14676, 906 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2018), https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_copyrightlawsuit/11/
Cambridge University Press v. Becker, 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga., 2012), http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_copyrightlawsuit/5
Cambridge University Press v. Becker, 371 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ga. 2016), https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_copyrightlawsuit/8/
Cambridge University Press v. Becker, 446 F. Supp. 3d 1145 (N.D. Ga. 2020), https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_copyrightlawsuit/13/
Cambridge University Press v. Patton, 769 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2014), https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_copyrightlawsuit/7/
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/
Canada, Parliament, House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry Science and Technology. (2019). Statutory review of the Copyright Act: Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. 42nd Parl., 1st sess. Retrieved from the Parliament of Canada website: https://bit.ly/41FPkMs
Canadian Association of University Teachers. (2013). CAUT guidelines for the use of copyrighted material. https://bit.ly/4vJS3SP
CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada [2004] SCC 13 (Can.), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2125/index.do
Center for Media & Social Impact. (2021). Codes of best practices. https://cmsimpact.org/report-list/codes/
Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Austl.), https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2022C00192/Download
Copyright Act 1994 (N.Z.), https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1994/0143/latest/DLM345634.html
Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. (2026), https://www.copyright.gov/title17/
Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c C-42 (Can.), https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-42/index.html
Copyright Agency Ltd v University of Adelaide [1999] 42 IPR 529 (Copyright Tribunal) (Austl.), https://bit.ly/4vA4vEm
Copyright Agency Ltd v Victoria University of Technology [1994] 29 IPR 263 (Fed. Ct. of Aust.) (Austl.), https://bit.ly/4sIUpP1
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, c. 48 (U.K.), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents
Copyright Licensing Ltd v University of Auckland [2002] 3 NZLR 76 (HC) (N.Z.).
Copyright Modernization Act, S.C. 2012, c 20 (Can.), https://canlii.ca/t/52md0
Craig, C. J. (2005). The changing face of fair dealing in Canadian copyright law: A proposal for legislative reform. In M. Geist (Ed.), In the public interest: The future of Canadian copyright law (pp. 437–461). Irwin Law. https://bit.ly/488lLXq
Craig, C. J. (2010). Locking out lawful users: Fair dealing and anti-circumvention in Bill C-32. In M. Geist (Ed.), From "radical extremism" to "balanced copyright": Canadian copyright and the digital agenda (pp. 177–203). Irwin Law. https://bit.ly/4sEMNgk
Craig, C. J. (2011). Copyright, communication and culture: Towards a relational theory of copyright law. Edward Elgar. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/faculty_books/53
Craig, C. J. (2021). Appendix three: Educational fair dealing in Canada. In M. Jacob, P. Jaszi, P. S. Adler, & W. Cross (Eds.), Code of best practices in fair use for open educational resources: A guide for authors, adapters & adopters of openly licensed teaching and learning materials (pp. 30–36). Center for Media and Social Impact, American University. https://cmsimpact.org/code/open-educational-resources/
Crews, K. D. (2001). The law of fair use and the illusion of fair-use guidelines. Ohio State Law Journal, 62(2), 599–702. https://www.arl.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/fair-use-code-crews.pdf
D'Agostino, G. (2008). Healing fair dealing? A comparative copyright analysis of Canada's fair dealing to U.K. fair dealing and U.S. fair use. McGill Law Journal, 53, 309–363. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdf/7046615-dAgostino.pdf
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications, Australia. (2021). Exposure draft, Copyright Amendment (access reform) Bill 2021 & review of technological protection measures exceptions [Discussion paper]. https://bit.ly/4893lG0
Elkin-Koren, N., & Fischman-Afori, O. (2015). Taking users' rights to the next level: A pragmatist approach to fair use. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 33(1), 1–45. https://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Elkin-Koren-Fischman-Afori-Final.pdf
Elkin-Koren, N., & Fischman-Afori, O. (2017). Rulifying fair use. Arizona Law Review, 59(1), 161–200. https://arizonalawreview.org/pdf/59-1/59arizlrev161.pdf
Elmahjub, E., & Suzor, N. (2017). Fair use and fairness in copyright: A distributive justice perspective on users' rights. Monash University Law Review, 43(1), 274–298. https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1092685/08_Elmahjub.pdf
Franki, R. J. A. (1976). Report of the copyright law committee on reprographic reproduction. Australian Government Publishing Service. https://static-copyright-com-au.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2015/05/R00507-Franki-Report.pdf
Geiger, C. (2017). Copyright as an access right: Securing cultural participation through the protection of creators’ interests. In R. Giblin & K. Weatherall (Eds.), What if we could reimagine copyright? (pp. 73–109). Australian National University. https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n2190/pdf/ch03.pdf
Giblin, R., & Weatherall, K. (2017). What if we could reimagine copyright? Australian National University. http://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/n2190/pdf/book.pdf
Gowers, A. (2006). Gowers review of intellectual property. https://bit.ly/3OpTNjg
Graham, R. (2025). Educational copying—The “very antithesis of fair dealing” or within copyright’s “breathing space”? Part 1: Statutory provisions. Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23786
Graham, R. (2026). Educational copying—The “very antithesis of fair dealing” or within copyright’s “breathing space”? Part 2: Judicial opinions. Journal of Copyright in Education and Librarianship.
Great Minds v. FedEx Office and Print Services Inc., No. 16-cv-1462 (DRH)(ARL) (E.D.N.Y., Feb. 24, 2017), https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/new-york/nyedce/2:2016cv01462/383140/26/0.pdf
Great Minds v. FedEx Office and Print Services Inc., 886 F.3d 91, 96 (2d Cir. 2018), https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/17-808/17-808-2018-03-21.pdf
Great Minds v. Office Depot, No. 17-CV-7435-JFW (Ex) (C.D. Cal., 2018), https://creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2018-01-18-40-Decision-granting-dismissal-of-infringement-claim.pdf
Great Minds v. Office Depot, 945 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2019) https://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/18-55331/18-55331-2019-12-27.pdf
Haines v Copyright Agency Ltd [1982] 42 ALR 549 (Fed. Ct. of Aust.) (Austl.). https://bit.ly/4cw6EIF
Handler, M., & Hudson, E. (2021). Fair use as an advance on fair dealing? Depolarizing the debate. In H. Sun, N.-L. Wee Loon, & S. Balganesh (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of copyright limitations and exceptions (pp. 140–157). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671101.012
Handler, M., & Rolph, D. (2003). Real pea souper: The Panel case and the development of the fair dealing defences to copyright infringement in Australia. Melbourne University Law Review, 27(2), 381–422. http://www.mulr.com.au/issues/27_2/27_2_4.pdf
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/539/
Hubbard v Vosper [1971] 1 All E. R. 1023 (C.A.) (U.K.), https://vlex.co.uk/vid/hubbard-v-vosper-792520373
Intellectual Property Office. (2014). Exceptions to copyright: Education and teaching. https://bit.ly/42jv57e
Johnson, M. (2019). Submission on review of the Copyright Act 1994: Issues paper. Universities New Zealand. https://bit.ly/4sCnfAt
Knopf, H. P. (1999). Copyright collectivity in the Canadian academic community: An alternative to the status quo? Intellectual Property Journal, 14, 109–139.
Laddie, H. (1996). Copyright: Over-strength, over-regulated, over-rated? European Intellectual Property Review, 18(5), 253–260.
Lehrburger, A. (2016). You be the judge: An analysis of the College Art Association's code of best practices in fair use for the visual arts. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 40(2), 237–273. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/lawandarts/article/download/2059/1019
Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103(5), 1105–1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457
Litman, J. (1990). The public domain. Emory Law Journal, 39(4), 965–1023. https://www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/litman_background.pdf
Litman, J. (2018). What we don't see when we see copyright as property. The Cambridge Law Journal, 77(3), 536–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197318000600
Longman Group Ltd v Carrington Technical Institute Board of Governors [1990] NZHC 521, http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/1990/521.pdf
Millett, T. (Ed.). (2013). The Copyright Act 1994 and amendments: Guidelines for librarians (7th ed.). Library and Information Association of New Zealand. https://lianza.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/LIANZA-Copyright-guidelines-October-2013.pdf
Pappalardo, K., & Fitzgerald, B. (2015). Copyright, fair use and the Australian constitution. Copyright perspectives: Past, present and prospect (pp. 125–164). Springer. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/91292/
Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 99 F.3d 1381 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1156 (1997).
Rothman, J. E. (2009). Best intentions: Reconsidering best practices statements in the context of fair use and copyright law. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 57(3), 371–387. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2455/
Samuelson, P., Baumgarten, J. A., Carroll, M. W., Cohen, J. E., Dow, T., Fitzgerald, B., Gasaway, L., Gervais, D., Ilardi, T., & Litman, J. (2010). The copyright principles project: Directions for reform. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 25(3), 1175–1245. https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1381
Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. (2007). Author rights & the SPARC author addendum. Retrieved June 27, 2023 from https://sparcopen.org/our-work/author-rights/
Sims, A. (2016). The case for fair use in New Zealand. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 24(2), 176–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaw003
Soar, M. (2014). If you're asking, it's not fair dealing: Animating Canadian copyright issues in a "read-write" classroom. In R. Coombe, D. Wershler, & M. Zeilinger (Eds.), Dynamic fair dealing: Creating Canadian culture online (pp. 154–163). University of Toronto Press. https://mattsoar.com/fairdealing/SoarFairDealing.pdf
Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada (SOCAN) v Bell Canada [2012] SCC 36 (Can.), http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/9996/index.do
Statute of Anne 1710, 8 Ann., c. 19 (Gr. Brit.), https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/anne_1710.asp
Théberge v Galerie d’Art du Petit Champlain Inc., [2002] SCC 34 (Can.), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1973/index.do
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
United Nations General Assembly. (1966). United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
Universities Canada. (2012, October 9). Fair dealing policy for universities. http://www.univcan.ca/media-room/media-releases/fair-dealing-policy-for-universities/
Universities UK Ltd v Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd [2002] RPC 36 (Copyright Tribunal), https://bit.ly/3QiBtcj
Vaver, D. (2013). User rights. Intellectual Property Journal, 25(2), 105–110.
Willinsky, J. (2022). Copyright's broken promise: How to restore the law's ability to promote the progress of science. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14201.001.0001
WIPO Copyright Treaty, 20 December 1996, (entered into force 6 March 2002), https://www.wipo.int/en/web/treaties/ip/wct/index
York University v The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) [2021] SCC 32 (Can.), https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/18972/index.do
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rumi Graham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
