The Federal Income Tax and Reform of College Athletics

A Response to Professor Colombo and an Independent Critique

Authors

  • William H. Lyons University of Nebraska
  • Josephine R. Potuto University of Nebraska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2.2.233

Abstract

Large athletics programs bring a lot of attention to themselves and the universities of which they are a part. Once, that attention came only from success on the field or court. Now it also comes from how much money these programs spend, and on what, and its source. Calls to use the federal tax code to rein in athletics spending are, we believe, ill-advised. The IRS has limited resources and a lot to do. Its staff members know tax law, not the ins and outs of college athletics. Because universities are adept at “zeroing out” revenues and expenses, it is unlikely that new tax rules and added IRS oversight would do much to curtail spending. They could, however, impose significant compliance costs on universities. The result could be the worst of all worlds: considerable expense on universities to comply; little or no spending reform achieved; and an IRS diverted from core responsibilities.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • William H. Lyons, University of Nebraska
    Lyons is the Richard H. Larson Professor of Tax Law, University of Nebraska College of Law. Potuto is the Richard H. Larson Professor of Constitutional Law, and is Nebraska’s faculty representative (FAR) to the NCAA and Big 12 Conference.
  • Josephine R. Potuto, University of Nebraska
    Lyons is the Richard H. Larson Professor of Tax Law, University of Nebraska College of Law. Potuto is the Richard H. Larson Professor of Constitutional Law, and is Nebraska’s faculty representative (FAR) to the NCAA and Big 12 Conference.

Published

2009-12-01

How to Cite

Lyons, W. H., & Potuto, J. R. (2009). The Federal Income Tax and Reform of College Athletics: A Response to Professor Colombo and an Independent Critique. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 2(2), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2.2.233