What It Means to “Win” in Small College Athletics: Strategic Contingency Theory and Alternative Success

Authors

  • Claire C. Zvosec Louisiana State University
  • Jordan R. Bass University of Kansas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v15i1.15196

Keywords:

NCAA Division II athletics, athletics sucess, student-athlete experience, enrollment goals

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to gain a deep understanding of how athletics success is defined and operationalized for small colleges in Division III athletics. Strategic Contingency Theory was utilized as a framework to examine and better understand how the small college athletics department operates “successfully.” The underlying premise of Strategic Contingency Theory is that an organization must adapt in order to survive. In-depth interviews were conducted with NCAA Division III Athletics Directors, campus administrators (e.g., President, Provost, Vice President for Enrollment Management), and Faculty Athletics Representatives to better understand how university and athletics administrators define athletics program success at small colleges. In all, 33 interviews were conducted across seven states at 11 different Division III institutions where student-athletes comprise 20% or more of the student body.

References

Andrew, D. P., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics.

Bandré, M.A. (2011). The impact of financial aid on the enrollment and retention of student athletes at National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III colleges and universities: A review of the literature. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 41(1), 38-45.

Barr, M. J., & McClellan, G. S. (2010). Budgets and financial management in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.

Bonvillian, G., & Murphy, R. (2014). The liberal arts college adapting to change: The survival of small schools. Routledge.

Bouchet, A. & Hutchinson, M. (2011). Organizational escalation and retreat in university athletics: brand insulation in Birmingham-Southern College’s transition to Division III athletics. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 4, 261-282.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Cooper, C.G. & Weight, E.A. (2012). Maximizing organizational effectiveness: NCAA Division III administrator core values and departmental culturization. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 5, 339-353.

Covell, D.D., Pelosi, M.K. & Lemoi, J. (2013). Joining the team: A case study identifying and assessing critical factors influencing NCAA Division III student-athlete matriculation. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 5(1), 31-56.

Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of management review, 9(2), 284-295.

Demirel, E. (2013, October 1). The D-III revolution: How America's most violent game may be saving liberal arts colleges. SB Nation. Retrieved from http://www.sbnation.com/longform/2013/10/1/4786810/diii-football-revolution

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

DesJardins, S. L., & Bell, A. (2006). Using economic concepts to inform enrollment management. New directions for institutional research, 2006(132), 59-74.

Division III facts and figures. (2020). NCAA. Retrieved from https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/about/d3/D3_FactandFigures.pdf

Divisional differences and the history of multidivision classification. (2021). NCAA. Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org/about/who-we-are/membership/divisional-differences-and-history-multidivision-classification

Doody, O., & Noonan, M. (2013). Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data. Nurse Researcher, 20(5), 28-32.

Douglas-Gabriel, D. (2015, January 5). Students now pay more of their public university tuition than state governments. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/get-there/wp/2015/01/05/students-cover-more-of-their-public-university-tuition-now-than-state-governments/

Duncan, R.B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.

Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2004). Research methods for sport studies. New York: Routledge.

Hendricks, S.P. & Johnson, A.T. (2016). The athlete-student dilemma: Exploring the experiences of specially admitted student-athletes at a Division III university. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 8(4), 1-20.

Hossler, D. (2000). The role of financial aid in enrollment management. New directions for student services, 2000(89), 77-90.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Katz, M., Cocieru, O.C., Springer, D.L., & Dixon, M. (2021). Fan ties and friendships: A longitudinal network study of Division III sports on campus. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport. 166-188.

Katz, M., Pfleegor, A.G., Schaeperkoetter, C.C., & Bass, J.R. (2015). Factors for success in NCAA Division III athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 8, 102-122.

Kerschner, D., Allan, E. (2021). Examining the nature and extent of hazing at five NCAA Division III institutions and considering the implications for prevention. Journal of Amateur Sport, 7(1), 95-118.

Kerwin, S. & Hoeber, L. (2015). Collaborative self-ethnography: Navigating self-reflexivity in a sport management context. Journal of Sport Management, 29(5), 498-509.

Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1969). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Nichols, B.A., Stellino, M.B., & Smith, M.A. (2020). Factors influencing college selection by NCAA Division III men’s basketball players. Journal of Amateur Sport, 6(1), 32-51.

Nixon, W.L., Mayo, Z.A., & Koo, W. (2021). Student-athlete college choice: Division I, II, and III football players. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 14, 152-169.

Office of Post-Secondary Education: Equity in Athletics Data Analysis Cutting Tool. (2021). Retrieved from http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/

Paule-Koba, A.L. & Farr, N.E. (2013). Examining the experiences of former D-I and D-III nonrevenue athletes. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 6, 194-215.

Peale, C. (2013, September 16). Small colleges use sports to boost the bottom line. Cincinnati Inquirer. Retrieved from http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20130916/NEWS0102/309160030/Small-colleges-use-sports-boost-bottom-line.

Riddle, M., Brint, S. G., Levy, C. S., & Turk-Bicakci, L. (2005). From the liberal to the practical arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular change. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 151-180.

Schaeperkoetter, C.C., Bass, J.R., & Gordon, B.S., (2015). Student-athlete school selection: A family systems theory approach. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 8, 266-286.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.

Sherter, A. (2013, March 19). State funding cuts slam public colleges. CBS Money Watch. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-funding-cuts-slam-public-colleges/

Size & setting classification description. (2021). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/size_setting.php

Smith, A. A., & Synowka, D. P. (2014). Financial state of affairs for NCAA sports: a case for intangible strategic assets?. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 19(1), 29-48.

Snyder, E., & Waterstone, K. (2015). An examination of Division III small college athletics: president and commissioner influence and change in athletic philosophy. Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 9(3), 195.

Westfall, S. B. (2006). Charting the territory: The small college dean. New Directions for Student Services, 2006(116), 5-13.

Williams, J., Colles, C. & Allen, K.J. (2010). Division III athletes: Perceptions of faculty interactions and academic support services. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 3, 211-233.

Willner, J. (2019). Private universities and NCAA D-III athletics as a general recruiting tool. International Advances in Economic Research, 25, 293-307.

Yost, M. (2010). Var$ity green: A behind the scenes look at culture and corruption in college athletics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Zdziarski, E. L. (2010). A small college perspective on institutional budget issues. New Directions for Student Services, 129, 21-27.

Zullo, R. (2021). NCAA Division III intercollegiate athletics corporate sponsorships: a systems theory approach. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(3), 1594-1606.

Zvosec, C.C., Bass, J.R., & Baer, N. (2021a). Student-athletes “taking the road less traveled:” Social Comparison Theory and the academically elite NCAA Division III institution. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-17.

Zvosec, C.C., Brown, C.M., Richardson, H., & Bass, J.R. (2021b). Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 14, 22-50.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-09

How to Cite

Zvosec, C. C., & Jordan R. Bass. (2022). What It Means to “Win” in Small College Athletics: Strategic Contingency Theory and Alternative Success. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 15(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v15i1.15196