Athletic ability, performance, and character: A hierarchical examination of prospective college athlete evaluation and the function of recruiting as institutional work

Authors

  • Drew Swinney Clemson University
  • Chris Corr Clemson University
  • Sarah Stokowski Clemson University
  • Mike Godfrey Clemson University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v18i1.21731

Keywords:

intercollegiate athletics, NCAA, institutional logics, coaching

Abstract

Intercollegiate athletics recruiting is depicted by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) as the “lifeblood” of college sport. Given the correlation between recruiting success and winning in college football specifically, and the relationship between winning and revenue generation, NCAA member institutions place the utmost significance on football recruiting. Within the context of football recruiting as strategic institutional work, college football coaches promulgate institutionalized logics through the indoctrination of prospective college athletes. To further conceptualize institutional work and logics in the recruitment of prospective college athletes, the present study sought to examine the evaluative factors college football coaches prioritize when recruiting prospective college athletes. Semi-structured interviews with 10 football coaches at Football Bowl Subdivision member institutions during the 2023 college football season reveal the strategic emphasis placed on football ability and football character in the recruitment of prospective college athletes.

Metrics

File downloads
148
Feb 22 '25Feb 25 '25Feb 28 '25Mar 01 '25Mar 04 '25Mar 07 '25Mar 10 '25Mar 13 '25Mar 16 '25Mar 19 '259
|

Downloads

References

Adams, I., Carine, J., & Emmerson, D. (2014) Doping in sport: Lance Armstrong, a case study. In Palmer, C. (Ed.). (pp. 169-190). The sports monograph: Critical perspectives on socio-cultural sport, coaching and physical education. SSTO Publications.

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1991). Backboards & blackboards: College athletes and role

engulfment. Columbia University Press.

Atwater, C., Corr, C., Whelan, C. (2022). Organizational replication and spending patterns

among FBS football and Division I basketball programs. The International Journal of Sport and Society, 14(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v14i01/105-125

Berkowitz, S. (2024, May 23). Big 12 paid former commissioner Bob Bowlsby $17.2 million in his final year. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2024/05/23/bob-bowlsby-big-12-pay-conference-revenue/73811171007/

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Bradbury, J. C., & Pitts, J. D. (2018). Full cost-of-attendance scholarships and college choice: Evidence from NCAA football. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(7), 977-989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527002517696958

Brown, Z. (2012). What’s said in this locker room, stays in this locker room: Restricting the

social media use of collegiate athletes and the implications for their institutions. Journal on Telecommunication and High Technology Law, 10, 421–443.

Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475

Caro, C. A. (2012). College football success: The relationship between recruiting and winning. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 7(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.7.1.139

Cascio, M. A., Lee, E., Vaudrin, N., & Freedman, D. A. (2019). A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods, 31(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19838237

Cooper, C. G., Huffman, L., & Weight, E. (2011). Choice factors and best fit principles encouraging “best fit” principles: Investigating college choice factors of student-athletes in NCAA Division I, II, and III Men’s wrestling. Theories & Applications the International Edition, 1(1), 92-106.

Corr, C., Atwater, C., & Hall, P. (2022b). Athlete first, student second: The thematic emphasis of Power-5 official visits and fostered athletic role engulfment. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 15, 714-733.

Corr, C., Atwater, C., & Stokowski, S. (2023c). Ageism in recruiting: Examining the relationship

between coaches’ age and recruiting ability in Power-5 football. Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics Annual, 38, 95-109.

Corr, C., Bopp, T., Atwater, C., & Nite, C. (2023a). Chasing stars: Racial tasking of recruiting

responsibilities among Power-5 football coaches. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 16(3), 263-278. https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v16i3.18977

Corr, C., Southall, C., Hawkins, B., & Southall, R. M. (2023e). College football “kids”:

Infantilizing language in Football Bowl Subdivision bowl game broadcasts. Sociology of Sport Journal, 41(2), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2022-0185

Corr, C., Southall, R. M., & Nagel, M. S. (2020). Southeastern Conference recruiting official

visits and the maintenance of the institution of Power-5 college sport. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 13, 252-272.

Corr, C., Southall, C., & Southall, R. M. (2022a). The ESPNification of FBS college football:

The adoption of an integrated marketing communication televisuality in FBS bowl game broadcasts. International Journal of Sport Communication, 15(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0124

Corr, C., Southall, R. M., Southall, C., & Hart, R. J. (2023b). Hyper-professionalized and

commodified: A case study examination of FBS bowl games and the utilization of football players as programmatic promotional material. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2022-0200

Corr, C., Weiner, J., & Stokowski, S. (2023d). “We do everything on our own”: FBS athletes’ perceptions of NIL value and support. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16, 334-351.

Covell, D., & Barr, C. A. (2001). The ties that bind: Presidential involvement with the development of NCAA division I initial eligibility legislation. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(4), 414-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2001.11777107

Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000006287390

Elmasry, T. (2017). History shows national titles without elite recruiting over 4 years is rare. Saturday Down South. https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/history-shows-national-titles-require-great-not-just-good-recruiting-over-4-years/

Fountain, J. J., & Finley, P. S. (2011). Academic clustering: A longitudinal analysis of a Division

I football program. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 4, 24-41.

Greenwell, T. C., Mahony, D. F., & Andrew, D. P. (2007). An examination of marketing

resource allocation in NCAA Division I athletics. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 16(2), 82-92.

Gutierrez, A. B., & McLaren, P. (2012). To be or not to be a snitch or a whistle-blower: Years of silence at Penn State. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 12(4), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1532708612446429

Huml, M. R., Bergman, M. J., Newell, E. M., & Hancock, M. G. (2019). From the playing field

to the classroom: The academic challenges for NCAA Division I athletes. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 13(2), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2019.1578609

Hutchinson, M., & Berg, B. K. (2014). Institutions of higher commitment: A case study of de

escalation and American football's decisive role in intercollegiate athletics. Sport Management Review, 18(3), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2014.09.002

Kercheval, B. (2016, February 2). Do top 10 recruiting classes really equal championships? Bleacher Report. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2613145-do-top-10-recruiting-classes-really-equal-championships

Kidd, V. D., Southall, R. M., Nagel, M. S., Reynolds II, J. F., Scheyett, A. M., & Anderson, C.

K. (2018). Profit-athletes’ athletic role set and post-athletic transitions. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 11(1), 115-141.

Kihl, L. A. (2018). The future of sport corruption scholarship and practice. In L.A. Kihl (Ed.),

Corruption in sport: Causes, consequences, and reform (201–214). Routledge.

Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). Sage Publications.

Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222

Levine, E. (2015). One coach, two schools: Double duty in the SEC since 2000. Saturday Down South. https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/one-coach-two-schools-double-duty-sec-since-2000/

Li, B., Stokowski, S., Dittmore, S. W., Malmo, J. R., & Rolfe, D. T. (2017). A case study of self-representation on Twitter: A gender analysis of how student-athletes portray themselves. Global Sport Business Journal, 5(1), 61-75.

LoMonte, F. (2020, September 23). Universities continue to block athletes from talking to the media. That’s got to stop. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org/educators-students/2020/universities-continue-to-block-athletes-from-talking-to-the-media-thats-got-to-stop/

Macaulay, C. D., Burton, L. J., & Woulfin, S. (2022). Making sense of competing logics in the collegiate athletic field: The sensemaking processes of college athletes. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 15, 94-124.

Macaulay, C. D., & Woulfin, S. (2023). Institutional plurality and a fractured organizational self. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 727-751. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-10-2022-0096

Magnusen, M. J., Kim, Y., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2014). A critical review and synthesis of student-athlete college choice factors: Recruiting effectiveness in NCAA sports. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 9(6), 1265-1286. https://doi.org/10.1260/1747-9541.9.6.1265

Magnusen, M. J., McAllister, C. P., Kim, J. W., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2017). The reputation playbook: Exploring how reputation can be leveraged to improve recruiting effectiveness in NCAA men’s basketball. Journal of Applied Sport Management, 9(2), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.18666/JASM-2017-V9-I2-8016

Mankin, J., Rivas, J., & Jewell, J. (2021). The effectiveness of college football recruiting ratings in predicting team success: A longitudinal study. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 14, 4-22.

Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research?

Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215

National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2022, August 1). Athletics personnel -- Conduct –

Institutionally issued devices and disclosure of information. NCAA. https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/search/proposalView?id=104161

National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2023, August 5). Division I 2023-24 manual. NCAA.

https://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/D124.pdf

Nite, C. (2017). Message framing as institutional maintenance: The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s institutional work of addressing legitimate threats. Sport Management Review, 20(4), 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.10.005

Nite, C., & Edwards, J. (2021). From isomorphism to institutional work: Advancing institutional theory in sport management research. Sport Management Review, 24(5), 815-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1896845

Nite, C., Ige, A., & Washington, M. (2019). The evolving institutional work of the National Collegiate Athletic Association to maintain dominance in a fragmented field. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2018.05.002

Nite, C., Singer, J. N., & Cunningham, G. B. (2013). Addressing competing logics between the mission of a religious university and the demands of intercollegiate athletics. Sport Management Review, 16(4), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2013.03.002

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and

practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Ocasio, W., Loewenstein, J., & Nigam, A. (2015). How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: The role of categories. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0274

Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications: Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(1), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011016813

Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10. 5465/amr.2002.6588004

Southall, R. M., Nagel, M. S., Staurowsky, E. J., Karcher, R. T., & Maxcy, J. G. (2023). The

NCAA and the exploitation of college profit-athletes: An amateurism that never was. University of South Carolina Press

Southall, R. M., & Staurowsky, E. J. (2013). Cheering on the collegiate model: Creating,

disseminating, and imbedding the NCAA’s redefinition of amateurism. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 37(4), 403-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723513498606

Southall, R. M., & Weiler, J. D. (2014). NCAA Division-I athletic departments: 21st century

athletic company towns. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 7, 161-186.

Stokowski, S., Dittmore, S. W., Stine, G., & Li, B. (2017). Resource decisions in academic

services: Which factors predict positive APR scores at NCAA Division I institutions? Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 11(3), 173-188.

Stokowski, S., Rudd, A., Corr, C., Jolly, K., & Fridley, A. (2023a). Replicating inclusivity: The

relationship between Directors’ Cup rankings and LGBTQI+ inclusive NCAA athletic departments. Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns, 4(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.53016/jerp.v4i1.95

Stokowski, S., Smith, A., Fridley, A., Corr, C., & Paule-Koba, A. L. (2023b). “The most

important shot you will ever take”: The burgeoning role of social media activism in challenging embedded NCAA patriarchy. International Journal of Sport Communication, 16(4), 482-492. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2023-0159

Thompson, C. J., Locander, W. B., & Pollio, H. R. (1989). Putting consumer experience back

into consumer research: The philosophy and method of existential phenomenology. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1086/209203

Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K.

Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage Publications.

Watkins, J., Slater, K., & Chang, L. (2022). The relationship between academic clustering and

athletic academic support center reporting lines in NCAA FBS programs. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 15(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v15i1.15226

Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative

research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-55.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Swinney, D., Corr, C., Stokowski, S., & Godfrey, M. (2025). Athletic ability, performance, and character: A hierarchical examination of prospective college athlete evaluation and the function of recruiting as institutional work. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v18i1.21731