Weighing the Options
Discrimination Against Fat Golfers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2016-0017Keywords:
weight, prejudice, fat, NCAA, athleticsAbstract
In drawing from multiple theoretical frameworks, including stigma theory (Goffman, 1963; Paetzold, Dipboye, & Eslbach, 2008) and social dominance theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), the purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of weight discrimination among coaches of NCAA women’s golf teams. Coaches participated in an experimental study, where they reviewed the resumes of high school golfers and indicated the likelihood of offering the golfer an athletic scholarship. The resumes varied by weight of the golfer and skill level, and coaches’ social dominance orientation was also measured. Fat golfers were less likely to be offered a scholarship than were thinner golfers. Player skill level moderated these effects, as did the coaches’ social dominance orientation. Contributions, limitations, and future directions are discussed.Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-12-01
Issue
Section
Peer-Reviewed Article
License
Copyright is held by the authors.
How to Cite
Melton, E. N., & Cunningham, G. B. (2016). Weighing the Options: Discrimination Against Fat Golfers. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 9(2), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2016-0017